Healthy Start vitamins—a missed opportunity:findings of a multimethod study

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and provide a real-life view of the operation of the Healthy Start vitamins scheme. SETTING: The study took place in primary care and community settings that served rural, urban and ethnically diverse populations, in two sentinel sites: London, and Yorkshire and the Humber. An online consultation and stakeholder workshops elicited views from across England. PARTICIPANTS: 669 health and social care practitioners including health visitors, midwives, public health practitioners, general practitioners, paediatricians and support staff participated in focus group discussions (n=49) and an online consultation (n=620). 56 participants representing health and social care practitioners, policymakers, service commissioners, and voluntary and independent sectors took part in stakeholder workshops. METHODS: Three-phase multimethod study comprising focus group discussions, an online consultation and stakeholder workshops. Qualitative data were analysed thematically and quantitative data from the online survey were analysed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Study participants were concerned about the low uptake of Healthy Start vitamin supplements and the consequences of this for health outcomes for women and young children. They experienced Healthy Start vitamin distribution as logistically complex, requiring the time, resources and creative thinking of a range of local and regional practitioners from senior strategists to administrative support workers. In the light of this, many participants argued that moving to universal provision of vitamin supplements would be more cost-effective than the current system. CONCLUSIONS: There is consistency of views of health practitioners that the current targeted system of providing free vitamin supplements for low-income childbearing women and young children via the Healthy Start programme is not fulfilling its potential to address vitamin deficiencies. There is wide professional and voluntary sector support for moving from the current targeted system to provision of free vitamin supplements for all pregnant and new mothers, and children up to their fifth birthday

A realist review to explore how low-income pregnant women use food vouchers from the UK’s Healthy Start programme

Objectives: To explore how low-income pregnant women use Healthy Start food vouchers, the potential impacts of the programme, which women might experience these impacts and why. Design: A realist review. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies: Primary or empirical studies (of any design) were included if they contributed relevant evidence or insights about how low-income women use food vouchers from the Healthy Start (UK) or the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children (US) programmes. The assessment of ‘relevance’ was deliberately broad to ensure that reviewers remained open to new ideas from a variety of sources of evidence. Analysis: A combination of evidence synthesis and realist analysis techniques was used to modify, refine and substantiate programme theories, which were constructed as explanatory ‘context – mechanism – outcome’ (CMO) configurations. Results: 38 primary studies were included in this review: four studies on Healthy Start and 34 studies on WIC. Two main outcome strands were identified: dietary improvements (intended) and financial assistance (unintended). Three evidence-informed programme theories were proposed to explain how aspects of context (and mechanisms) may generate these outcomes: the ‘relative value’ of healthy eating (prioritisation of resources); retailer discretion (pressure to ‘bend the rules’); the influence of other family members (disempowerment). Conclusions: This realist review suggests that some low-income pregnant women may use Healthy Start vouchers to increase their consumption of fruits and vegetables and plain cow’s milk, whereas others may use them to reduce food expenditure and save money for other things

The public health rationale for reducing saturated fat intakes:Is a maximum of 10% energy intake a good recommendation?

The role of saturated fat (SFA) in health is frequently debated. Guidelines from different countries are quite comparable, in that they generally advise people to avoid high intakes of SFA and to replace some saturated fats by cis unsaturated fats. A maximum level of intake of 10% energy of SFA (of total energy) is often advised as a guideline for the general population. This paper discusses issues around SFA and health including the pros and cons of randomised controlled trials with hard endpoints, prospective cohort studies and controlled dietary intervention studies with intermediate endpoints and risk markers, concluding that there is not a single kind of research study that will answer the question on whether intake of saturated fat influences health or not. However, taking all the evidence together suggests that replacing SFA by unsaturated fat, preferably polyunsaturated fat (PUFA), to an intake below 10% energy will favourably affect the risk of cardiovascular disease. It is important to take into account that the proposed changes should be implemented in an otherwise healthy and complete diet. To reach an intake of less than 10% energy from SFA without compromising on the quality of the total diet, the intake of fatty meat and baked goods such as cakes and pastries should be reduced and butter, lard and hard baking fats should be replaced by unsaturated oils and fat spreads made from them