Transcriptional profiling of breast cancer-associated lymphatic vessels reveals VCAM-1 as regulator of lymphatic invasion and permeability

Tumor-associated lymphangiogenesis and lymphatic invasion of tumor cells correlate with poor outcome in many tumor types, including breast cancer. Various explanations for this correlation have been suggested in the past, including the promotion of lymphatic metastasis and an immune-inhibitory function of lymphatic endothelial cells (LECs). However, the molecular features of tumor-associated lymphatic vessels and their implications for tumor progression have been poorly characterized. Here, we report the first transcriptional analysis of tumor-associated LECs directly isolated from the primary tumor in an orthotopic mouse model of triple negative breast cancer (4T1). Gene expression analysis showed a strong upregulation of inflammation-associated genes, including endothelial adhesion molecules such as VCAM-1, in comparison to LECs derived from control tissue. In vitro experiments demonstrated that VCAM-1 is not involved in the adhesion of tumor cells to LECs but unexpectedly promoted lymphatic permeability by weakening of lymphatic junctions, most likely through a mechanism triggered by interactions with integrin α4 which was also induced in tumor-associated LECs. In line with this, in vivo blockade of VCAM-1 reduced lymphatic invasion of 4T1 cells. Taken together, our findings suggest that disruption of lymphatic junctions and increased permeability via tumor-induced lymphatic VCAM-1 expression may represent a new target to block lymphatic invasion and metastasis

Sialoglycans on lymphatic endothelial cells augment interactions with Siglec-1 (CD169) of lymph node macrophages

Cellular interactions between endothelial cells and macrophages regulate macrophage localization and phenotype, but the mechanisms underlying these interactions are poorly understood. Here we explored the role of sialoglycans on lymphatic endothelial cells (LEC) in interactions with macrophage-expressed Siglec-1 (CD169). Lectin-binding assays and mass spectrometric analyses revealed that LEC from human skin express more sialylated glycans than the corresponding blood endothelial cells. Higher amounts of sialylated and/or sulfated glycans on LEC than BEC were consistently observed in murine skin, lung and lymph nodes. The floor LEC of the subcapsular sinus (SCS) in murine lymph nodes (LN) displayed sialylated glycans at particularly high densities. The sialoglycans of LN LEC were strongly bound by Siglec-1. Such binding plays an important role in the localization of Siglec-1+ LN-SCS macrophages, as their numbers are strongly reduced in mice expressing a Siglec-1 mutant that is defective in sialoglycan binding. The residual Siglec-1+ macrophages are less proliferative and have a more anti-inflammatory phenotype. We propose that the densely clustered, sialylated glycans on the SCS floor LEC are a key component of the macrophage niche, providing anchorage for the Siglec-1+ LN-SCS macrophages.ISSN:0892-6638ISSN:1530-686

CD169+ lymph node macrophages have protective functions in mouse breast cancer metastasis

Although the contribution of macrophages to metastasis is widely studied in primary tumors, the involvement of macrophages in tumor-draining lymph nodes (LNs) in this process is less clear. We find CD169+ macrophages as the predominant macrophage subtype in naive LNs, which undergo proliferative expansion in response to tumor stimuli. CD169+ LN macrophage depletion, using an anti-CSF-1R antibody or clodronate-loaded liposomes, leads to increased metastatic burden in two mouse breast cancer models. The expansion of CD169+ macrophages is tightly connected to B cell expansion in tumor-draining LNs, and B cell depletion abrogates the effect of CD169+ macrophage absence on metastasis, indicating that the CD169+ macrophage anti-metastatic effects require B cell presence. These results reveal a protective role of CD169+ LN macrophages in breast cancer metastasis and raise caution for the use of drugs aiming at the depletion of tumor-associated macrophages, which might simultaneously deplete macrophages in tumor-draining LNs.ISSN:2666-3864ISSN:2211-124

Mechanisms of Tumor-Induced Lymphovascular Niche Formation in Draining Lymph Nodes

Summary: Enlargement of the lymphatic vascular network in tumor-draining lymph nodes (LNs) often precedes LN metastasis, likely providing a lymphovascular niche for tumor cells. We investigated morphological and molecular changes associated with the lymphatic remodeling process, using the 4T1 breast cancer and B16F10 melanoma models. Lymphatic expansion in tumor-draining LNs is mediated by sprouting and proliferation of lymphatic endothelial cells (LECs) as early as 4 days after tumor implantation. RNA sequencing revealed an altered transcriptional profile of LECs from tumor-draining compared to naive LNs with similar changes in both tumor models. Integrin αIIb is upregulated in LECs of tumor-draining LNs and mediates LEC adhesion to fibrinogen in vitro. LEC-associated fibrinogen was also detected in LNs in vivo, suggesting a role of integrin αIIb in lymphatic remodeling. Together, our results identify specific responses of LN LECs to tumor stimuli and provide insights into the mechanisms of lymphovascular niche formation in tumor-draining LNs. : Commerford et al. characterize the morphological and molecular changes that occur in lymphatic endothelial cells (LECs) in tumor-draining lymph nodes (LNs) in two distinct tumor models. They show an upregulation of integrin αIIb in LN LECs and find that integrin αIIb mediates LEC adhesion to fibrinogen. Keywords: breast cancer, skin cancer, tumor promotion and progression, cell adhesion, cell matrix interactions, endothelial cell functions, lymph node lymphangiogenesis, gene expression profilin

A Survey of Empirical Results on Program Slicing

International audienceBACKGROUND:Patients with peripheral artery disease have an increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Antiplatelet agents are widely used to reduce these complications.METHODS:This was a multicentre, double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial for which patients were recruited at 602 hospitals, clinics, or community practices from 33 countries across six continents. Eligible patients had a history of peripheral artery disease of the lower extremities (previous peripheral bypass surgery or angioplasty, limb or foot amputation, intermittent claudication with objective evidence of peripheral artery disease), of the carotid arteries (previous carotid artery revascularisation or asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis of at least 50%), or coronary artery disease with an ankle-brachial index of less than 0·90. After a 30-day run-in period, patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive oral rivaroxaban (2·5 mg twice a day) plus aspirin (100 mg once a day), rivaroxaban twice a day (5 mg with aspirin placebo once a day), or to aspirin once a day (100 mg and rivaroxaban placebo twice a day). Randomisation was computer generated. Each treatment group was double dummy, and the patient, investigators, and central study staff were masked to treatment allocation. The primary outcome was cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction or stroke; the primary peripheral artery disease outcome was major adverse limb events including major amputation. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01776424, and is closed to new participants.FINDINGS:Between March 12, 2013, and May 10, 2016, we enrolled 7470 patients with peripheral artery disease from 558 centres. The combination of rivaroxaban plus aspirin compared with aspirin alone reduced the composite endpoint of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke (126 [5%] of 2492 vs 174 [7%] of 2504; hazard ratio [HR] 0·72, 95% CI 0·57-0·90, p=0·0047), and major adverse limb events including major amputation (32 [1%] vs 60 [2%]; HR 0·54 95% CI 0·35-0·82, p=0·0037). Rivaroxaban 5 mg twice a day compared with aspirin alone did not significantly reduce the composite endpoint (149 [6%] of 2474 vs 174 [7%] of 2504; HR 0·86, 95% CI 0·69-1·08, p=0·19), but reduced major adverse limb events including major amputation (40 [2%] vs 60 [2%]; HR 0·67, 95% CI 0·45-1·00, p=0·05). The median duration of treatment was 21 months. The use of the rivaroxaban plus aspirin combination increased major bleeding compared with the aspirin alone group (77 [3%] of 2492 vs 48 [2%] of 2504; HR 1·61, 95% CI 1·12-2·31, p=0·0089), which was mainly gastrointestinal. Similarly, major bleeding occurred in 79 (3%) of 2474 patients with rivaroxaban 5 mg, and in 48 (2%) of 2504 in the aspirin alone group (HR 1·68, 95% CI 1·17-2·40; p=0·0043).INTERPRETATION:Low-dose rivaroxaban taken twice a day plus aspirin once a day reduced major adverse cardiovascular and limb events when compared with aspirin alone. Although major bleeding was increased, fatal or critical organ bleeding was not. This combination therapy represents an important advance in the management of patients with peripheral artery disease. Rivaroxaban alone did not significantly reduce major adverse cardiovascular events compared with asprin alone, but reduced major adverse limb events and increased major bleeding