93 research outputs found
Le temps du naufrage
Le « temps du naufrage » est aujourdâhui circonscrit Ă celui de la perte dâun navire, dâune pollution et le plus souvent dâinterminables procĂ©dures judiciaires Ă lâencontre dâarmateurs nĂ©gligents ou de capitaines imprudents. Tout au long du xviiie siĂšcle, de trĂšs nombreux navires vinrent se perdre sur les cĂŽtes de Cornouaille. Sâappuyant sur une juridiction, lâamirautĂ©, et un droit nouveau dĂ©fini par lâOrdonnance de la Marine de 1681, il est possible de retracer un « temps du naufrage » dĂ©bordant largement le seul fracas du navire sur les rochers. Par le biais de cet accident, envisagĂ© comme un fait historique total, câest le commerce maritime sur un axe majeur de navigation et ses alĂ©as qui se rĂ©vĂšlent. Au travers des opĂ©rations de sauvetage des marchandises Ă©parpillĂ©es sur le littoral sous la conduite des officiers dâamirautĂ©, apparaissent les populations de ces franges bordiĂšres, dont les comportements souvent hĂątivement rĂ©sumĂ©s aux seuls pillages sont beaucoup plus complexes et relĂšvent dâune prise en compte dâune lĂ©gislation nouvelle, favorable aux « sauveteurs » et qui conduit Ă un progressif dĂ©clin du pillage des navires Ă la fin du xviiie siĂšcle. Le « temps du naufrage » ne se rĂ©sume pas seulement Ă un grand thĂšme romantique dont les Ă©vocations picturales ne sauraient retranscrire toute la complexitĂ© dâun phĂ©nomĂšne qui implique non seulement les Ă©quipages, mais Ă©galement les populations du littoral ou les reprĂ©sentants de lâautoritĂ© royale.The period covered today by the term âshipwreckâ includes the actual event, whether vessel loss or pollution, and also, most of the time, the endless law actions against careless ship-owners or reckless captains. Throughout the 18th century, a great many ships were wrecked along the coast of Cornouaille in Brittany. By working from a jurisdiction, the Admiralty, and the new legal framework defined by the 1681 Maritime Order, it is possible to identify a âshipwreck eventâ going well beyond the actual moment of the vesselâs shattering on the rocks. This accident, if considered as a complete historical event, is the lens through which the entire sea trading structure and its hazards, on a major navigation axis, stands revealed. The salvaging of the goods scattered along the shore, under the supervision of admiralty officers, gives us a glimpse of the populations of these coastal fringes. Their behaviour, too often and too summarily restricted to the sole plundering function, is far more complex, and includes an awareness of a new legislation favourable to âsalvagersâ, which led to a gradual decline of vessel looting at the end of the 18th century. The âshipwreck eventâ is more than a great romantic theme, its evocative pictorial representations cannot account for the full complexity of a phenomenon involving not only the crews, but also the coastal population, and the representatives of the Crown
Understanding travel behaviour change during mega-events: Lessons from the London 2012 Games
This paper presents results from a longitudinal study of the travel behaviour change associated with the London 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games (the âGamesâ). The research examines commuter travel behaviour through a panel approach enabling an understanding of individual behaviour across three waves (before, during and after), with the study utilising unique access to a Transport for London panel study (n=1132). The findings indicate that a substantial amount of change occurred during the Games (54% made at least one change), with reducing or re-timing journeys being the most likely adaptations made. A key objective of this work was to advance the discussion about the theoretical constructs that are most applicable in the study of behaviour change associated with disruptive events, which was done through the application and critical evaluation of the Transtheoretical Model. The insights from the stages of change element of the model were relatively limited but the analysis shows significant differences in the underlying factors explaining change according to the type of change made (reduce, re-time, re-mode and re-route). Whilst the long-term behavioural impacts of events like the Games appear small, the study has uncovered a need to consider these behavioural choices as distinct rather than under the collective term of âtravel behaviour changeâ, as is current practice
Les amirautés de Quimper, Lorient et Vannes face au risque maritime : étude comparée (1720-1790)
International audienc
Les difficultés de l'archéologie sous-marine aujourd'hui
International audienc
Maritime accidents in 18th-century Brittany
International audienceThe objective of this research is, from a Global History viewpoint, to look at Maritime Risk under a combination offactors (such as the weather, the maritime trade rhythm, crew training, the run-down state of the ship and navigationmodes) in order to develop a view of an event as an indicator of a complex whole. This study is based on archives issuedby various admiralties of coastal Brittany
Les procĂ©dures dâavaries dans lâamirautĂ© de Lorient (1782-1791)
Si le naufrage constitue lâacmĂ© dans la hiĂ©rarchie des risques maritimes, il constitue Ă©galement lâessentiel dans lâĂ©tude des accidents maritimes. Pour autant, si la perte totale dâun bĂątiment constitue un drame humain, une catastrophe Ă©conomique et une question de droit, le traitement des dommages survenus sur un navire ou sa cargaison durant un voyage rĂ©vĂšlent que le principe de la division du risque Ă©tait appliquĂ© au transport maritime et que les modalitĂ©s en Ă©taient encadrĂ©es par des modalitĂ©s juridiques particuliĂšres.Le prĂ©sent article se propose, Ă travers le prisme des procĂ©dures dâavaries instruites entre 1782 et 1791 par lâamirautĂ© de Lorient, de prĂ©senter lâactivitĂ© de cette institution en la matiĂšre, ceci dans le contexte du commerce maritime de la Compagnie des Indes en cette fin de xviiie siĂšcle. Lâaction de lâamirautĂ© en matiĂšre de droit maritime, basĂ©e sur lâOrdonnance de la Marine de 1681, atteste du rĂŽle des « experts » dans le rĂšglement des contentieux juridico-maritimes, mĂȘlant armateurs, marchands-chargeurs et assureurs. Il sâagit en effet, par le biais dâune procĂ©dure normalisĂ©e, de permettre la continuitĂ© du commerce par voie de mer en sâappuyant sur le droit, Ă partir dâexpertises pratiquĂ©es Ă bord des navires ayant eu Ă subir une avarie.If the « shipwreck » is the acme in the hierarchy of maritime risks, it also remains in historiography the predominant element in the study of marine accidents. However, if the total loss of a ship is a human tragedy, an economic catastrophe and an object of law, damage occurred on a ship or its cargo during a trip also reveal important aspects of the problem of the sharing of maritime transport risks and its legal procedures.This article aims, through the prism of damage instructed procedures between 1782 and 1791 by the Admiralty of Lorient, to present the activity of this institution in this area in the context of the French East India Company at the end of the eighteenth century.The action of the Admiralty in maritime law, defined by the 1681 Maritime Order, emphasises the role of "Surveyors" provided by an institution in the resolution of legal and maritime cases combining ship owners, merchants-chargers and insurers.The aim was, through a standardised procedure, to ensure the continuity of trade by sea by relying on the law, on the basis of expert opinions carried out on board ships that had suffered damage
SynthÚse du débat autour de la protection juridique du patrimoine sous-marin
International audienc
- âŠ