Retromesenteric Omental Flap for Complete Arterial Coverage During Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Surgical Technique

Postoperative pancreatic fistula is a frequent complication of pancreaticoduodenectomy that can trigger arterial lesions resulting in post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH) in up to 10-15% of cases. We describe an original omental flap technique including mobilization of the greater omentum through the retromesenteric window allowing coverage of all exposed peripancreatic arteries before reconstruction. This technique, used in 146 patients, did not carry any specific morbidities except for one case of partial flap necrosis treated conservatively and was associated with a significant reduction in grade B/C PPH

Evolution of Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) Biomarkers in Response to Weight Loss 1 Year After Bariatric Surgery—a Post Hoc Analysis of the FibroTest Prospective Study

International audienc

Factors of Early Recurrence After Resection for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

International audienceBackgroundTwo‐thirds of patients undergoing liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma experience recurrence after surgery. Our aim was to identify factors associated with early recurrence after resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.MethodsPatients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma undergoing curative intent resection (complete resection and lymphadenectomy) were included in two centers between 2005 and 2021 and were divided into three groups: early recurrence ( 12 months), and no recurrence. Patients experiencing early (ResultsAmong 120 included patients, 44 (36.7%) experienced early recurrence, 24 (20.0%) experienced delayed recurrence, and 52 (43.3%) did not experience recurrence after a median follow‐up of 59 months (IQR: 26‐113). The median recurrence‐free survival was 16 months (95% CI: 9.6–22.4). Median overall survival was 55 months (95% CI: 45.7–64.3), while it was 25 months for patients with early recurrence ( p  70 mm in early vs. 58.3% in delayed vs. 26.9% in no recurrence group, p = 0.002), multiple lesions (65.9% vs. 29.2% vs. 11.5%, p ConclusionEarly recurrence after curative resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is frequent and is associated with the presence of multiple lesions and positive lymph nodes, raising the question of surgery's futility in this context

Impact of induction therapy in locally advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

International audienceIntroductionAfter local or systemic treatment, a small number of patients with primarily unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) may benefit from secondary resection. This study aimed to analyze the oncological outcome of patients who underwent radical surgery after preoperative treatment.MethodsFrom 2000 to 2021, all patients who underwent curative-intent liver resection for ICC in three tertiary centers were selected. Patients were divided into two groups: upfront surgery (US) and preoperative treatment (POT). Oncologic data (preoperative treatment, histologic data, adjuvant chemotherapy, overall survival, and recurrence-free survival) were compared between the two groups.ResultsAmong 198 included patients, 31 (15.7%) received POT including chemotherapy (74.2%), radioembolization (12.9%), chemoembolization (9.7%), or combined radiotherapy and chemotherapy (3.2%). Major resection was performed in 156 (78.8%) patients, and 53 (26.8%) had vascular and/or biliary reconstruction. Histological findings were similar between US and POT group and were not affected by the type of POT. After a median follow-up of 23 months, recurrence rate (58.1% POT vs. 55.1% US, p = 0.760) and type were similar between groups. Recurrence-free survival at 1 and 3 years (41.9% and 22.6% vs. 46.7 and 21.6% in the POT and US, respectively, p = 0.989) and overall survival at 1 and 3 years (77.4% and 32.3% vs. 69.5% and 34.7% in the POT and US respectively, p = 0.323) were similar and independent of the POT type.ConclusionAfter POT, downstaged patients who underwent curative-intent resection for initially unresectable ICC have similar long-term outcomes as those undergoing upfront surgery

Indications and Outcomes of a Cross-Linked Porcine Dermal Collagen Mesh (Permacol) for Complex Abdominal Wall Reconstruction: A Multicenter Audit

IF 2.766International audienceIntroductionTo reduce the occurrence of complications in the setting of high-risk patients with contaminated operative field, a wide range of biologic meshes has been developed. Yet, few series have reported outcomes after abdominal wall repair (AWR) using such meshes. Permacol is an acellular porcine dermal collagen matrix with a cross-linked pattern. This study reports short- and long-term outcomes after AWR for incisional hernia using Permacol.Materials and methodsAll consecutive patients undergoing single-stage open AWR using Permacol mesh at eight university hospitals were included. Mortality, complication and hernia recurrence rates were assessed. Independent risk factors for complications and hernia recurrence were identified with logistic regression and Fine and Gray analysis, respectively.ResultsOverall, 250 patients underwent single-stage AWR with Permacol. Nearly 80% had a VHWG grade 3 or 4 defect. In-hospital mortality and complication rates were 4.8% (n = 12) and 61.6% (n = 154), respectively. Reintervention for complications was required for 74 patients (29.6%). Mesh explantation rate was 4% (n = 10). Independent risk factors for complications were smoking, defect size and VHWG grade. After a mean follow-up time of 16.8 months (± 18.1 months), 63 (25.2%) experienced hernia recurrence. One-, 2- and 3-year RFS were 90%, 74% and 57%, respectively. Previous AWR, mesh location and the need for reintervention were independent predictors of hernia recurrence.DiscussionSingle-stage AWR is feasible using Permacol. Mortality and complication rates are high due to patients’ comorbidities and the degree of contamination of the operative field. Given the observed recurrence rate, the benefit of biologics remains to be ascertained

Assessment of Factors Associated with Morbidity and Textbook Outcomes of Laparoscopic Liver Resection in Obese Patients. A French Nationwide Study

BACKGROUND: Liver surgeons need to know the expected outcomes of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) in obese patients.OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present study is to assess morbidity, mortality and textbook outcomes (TO) after LLR in obese patients.METHODS: This is a French multicenter study of patients undergoing LLR between 1996 and 2018. Obesity was defined by a BMI at or above 30 kg/m(2). Short-term outcomes and TO were compared between obese (ob) and nonobese (non-ob) patients. Factors associated with severe morbidity and TO were investigated.RESULTS: Of 3,154 patients included, 616 (19.5%) were obese. Ob-group patients had significantly higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score and higher incidence of metabolic syndrome and chronic liver disease and were less likely to undergo major hepatectomy. Mortality rates were similar between ob and non-ob groups (0.8 vs 1.1%; p = 0.66). Overall morbidity and hospital stay were significantly increased in the ob group compared with the non-ob group (39.4 vs 34.7%, p = 0.03; and 9.5 vs 8.6 days, p = 0.02), whereas severe 90-day morbidity (at or above Clavien-Dindo grade III) was similar between groups (8% in both groups; p = 0.90). TO rate was significantly lower for the ob group than the non-ob group (58.3 vs 63.7%; p = 0.01). In multivariate analysis, obesity did not emerge as a risk factor for severe 90-day morbidity but was associated with a lower TO rate after LLR (odds ratio = 0.8, 95% CI 0.7-1.0; p = 0.03).CONCLUSIONS: LLR in obese patients is safe and effective with acceptable mortality and morbidity. Obesity had no impact on severe morbidity but was a factor for failing to achieve TO after LLR. (C) 2022 by the American College of Surgeons. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved

Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Report of an international multicenter cohort study with propensity score matching

Background: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is a rare disease with a poor prognosis. In patients where surgical resection is possible, outcome is influenced by perioperative morbidity and lymph node status. Laparoscopic liver resection is associated with improved clinical and oncological outcomes in primary and metastatic liver cancer compared with open liver resection, but evidence on intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is still insufficient.The primary aim of this study was to compare overall survival for a large series of patients treated for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma by open or laparoscopic approach. Secondary objectives were to compare disease-free survival, predictors of death, and recurrence.Methods: Patients treated with laparoscopic or open liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma from 2000 to 2018 from 3 large international databases were analyzed retrospectively. Each patient in the laparoscopic resection group (case) was matched with 1 open resection control (1:1 ratio), through a propensity score calculated on clinically relevant preoperative covariates. Overall and disease-free survival were compared between the matched groups. Predictors of mortality and recurrence were analyzed with Cox regression, and the Textbook Outcomes were described.Results: During the study period, 855 patients met the inclusion criteria (open liver resection = 709, 82.9%; laparoscopic liver resection = 146, 17.1%). Two groups of 89 patients each were analyzed after propensity score matching, with no significant difference regarding pre-and postoperative variables. Overall survival at 1, 3, and 5 years was 92%, 75%, and 63% in the laparoscopic liver resection group versus 92%, 58%, and 49% in the open liver resection group (P = .0043). Adjusted Cox regression revealed severe postoperative complications (hazard ratio: 10.5, 95% confidence interval [1.01-109] P = .049) and steatosis (hazard ratio: 13.8, 95% confidence interval [1.23-154] P = .033) as predictors of death, and transfusion (hazard ratio: 19.2, 95% confidence interval [4.04-91.4] P < .001) and severe postoperative complications (hazard ratio: 4.07, 95% confidence interval [1.15-14.4] P = .030) as predictors of recurrence.Conclusion: The survival advantage of laparoscopic liver resection over open liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is equivocal, given historical bias and missing data. (C) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved