The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials

Flaws in the design, conduct, analysis, and reporting of randomised trials can cause the effect of an intervention to be underestimated or overestimated. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias aims to make the process clearer and more accurat

Employer Best Practice Guidelines for the Return to Work of Workers on Mental Disorder–Related Disability Leave

ObjectiveThere has been an increasing number of employer best practice guidelines (BPGs) for the return to work (RTW) from mental disorder-related disability leave. This systematic review addresses 2 questions: 1) What is the quality of the development and recommendations of these BPGs? and 2) What are the areas of agreement and discrepancy among the identified guidelines related to the RTW from mental illness-related disability leave?MethodA systematic literature search was performed using publically available grey literature and best practice portals. It focused on the RTW of workers with medically certified disability leave related to mental disorders. The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) was used to assess the quality of the development and recommendations of these BPGs.ResultsA total of 58 unique documents were identified for screening. After screening, 5 BPGs were appraised using AGREE II; 3 BPGs were included in the final set. There were no discrepancies among the 3, although they were from different countries. They all agreed there should be: 1) well-described organizational policies and procedures for the roles and responsibilities of all stakeholders, 2) a disability leave plan, and 3) work accommodations. In addition, one guideline suggested supervisor training and mental health literacy training for all staff.ConclusionAlthough there were no discrepancies among the 3 BPGs, they emphasized different aspects of RTW and could be considered to be complementary. Together, they provide important guidance for those seeking to understand employer best practices for mental illness-related disability

Clinical outcomes in pediatric intestinal failure: a meta-analysis and meta-regression.

BACKGROUND: Intestinal failure (IF) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, yet specific parameters that determine medium- and long-term outcomes remain ill defined. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the long-term outcomes in childhood IF and identify patient characteristics associated with clinical endpoints. DESIGN: MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for cohorts of >10 pediatric-onset IF patients with >12 mo follow-up. Random-effects meta-analysis and meta-regression weighted by follow-up duration were used to calculate clinical outcome rates and patient factors associated with outcomes. Primary outcome was mortality rate; secondary outcomes included neurodevelopmental status, transplantation, IF-associated liver disease (IFALD), enteral autonomy, and sepsis. RESULTS: In total, 175 cohorts (9318 patients and 34,549 y follow-up) were included in the meta-analysis. Overall mortality was 5.2% per y (95% CI: 4.3, 6.0) and was associated with sepsis and IFALD on meta-regression. Mortality rate improved with time from 5.9% per y pre-2000 to 4.5% per y post-2005. Sepsis rate was also predictive of IFALD and liver failure. Enteral autonomy was associated with small bowel length but not presence of ileo-cecal valve. There was a relative lack of data on neurodevelopmental outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Sepsis is the primary modifiable factor associated with mortality and liver failure, whereas enteral autonomy correlates with small-bowel length. No clear parameters have been identified that accurately predict neurodevelopmental outcomes, and hence further research is needed. Together, our findings are helpful for parental counseling and resource planning, and support targeting reduction in sepsis.Wellcome Trust Fellowship (216329/Z/19/Z