Colistin-sparing regimens against Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae isolates: Combination of tigecycline or doxycycline and gentamicin or amikacin

AbstractBackground/PurposeIn vitro studies of the combination of an aminoglycoside with tigecycline or doxycycline against Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing K. pneumoniae isolates are rarely published. The goal of this study was to evaluate the antibacterial activity of the combination regimens.MethodsThirteen genetically different KPC-producing K. pneumoniae isolates were randomly selected. Drug concentrations of amikacin, gentamicin, tigecycline, and doxycycline were adjusted to 1-, 1/2-, and 1/4-fold of respective minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs). Each drug alone or the combinations of amikacin or gentamicin with tigecycline or doxycycline were tested by combination studies.ResultsTreatment with the 1× MIC concentration in combinations of amikacin or gentamicin and tigecycline or doxycycline for 24 hours resulted in bactericidal activity of 84–100% in the isolates. Treatment with 1/2× MIC combinations resulted in synergism of 69–100% in the isolates. Notably, doxycycline plus gentamicin or amikacin was synergistic for all tested isolates. However, bactericidal or synergistic effect was barely evident following 1/4× MIC combinations. There was no antagonism in any of the combination regimens.ConclusionEnhanced activity was noted following treatment with doxycycline combined with gentamicin or amikacin against KPC-producing K. pneumoniae isolates, warranting further in vitro and animal investigations before clinical application

Detecting imipenem resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii by automated systems (BD Phoenix, Microscan WalkAway, Vitek 2); high error rates with Microscan WalkAway

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Increasing reports of carbapenem resistant <it>Acinetobacter baumannii </it>infections are of serious concern. Reliable susceptibility testing results remains a critical issue for the clinical outcome. Automated systems are increasingly used for species identification and susceptibility testing. This study was organized to evaluate the accuracies of three widely used automated susceptibility testing methods for testing the imipenem susceptibilities of <it>A. baumannii </it>isolates, by comparing to the validated test methods.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Selected 112 clinical isolates of <it>A. baumanii </it>collected between January 2003 and May 2006 were tested to confirm imipenem susceptibility results. Strains were tested against imipenem by the reference broth microdilution (BMD), disk diffusion (DD), Etest, BD Phoenix, MicroScan WalkAway and Vitek 2 automated systems. Data were analysed by comparing the results from each test method to those produced by the reference BMD test.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>MicroScan performed true identification of all <it>A. baumannii </it>strains while Vitek 2 unidentified one strain, Phoenix unidentified two strains and misidentified two strains. Eighty seven of the strains (78%) were resistant to imipenem by BMD. Etest, Vitek 2 and BD Phoenix produced acceptable error rates when tested against imipenem. Etest showed the best performance with only two minor errors (1.8%). Vitek 2 produced eight minor errors(7.2%). BD Phoenix produced three major errors (2.8%). DD produced two very major errors (1.8%) (slightly higher (0.3%) than the acceptable limit) and three major errors (2.7%). MicroScan showed the worst performance in susceptibility testing with unacceptable error rates; 28 very major (25%) and 50 minor errors (44.6%).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Reporting errors for <it>A. baumannii </it>against imipenem do exist in susceptibility testing systems. We suggest clinical laboratories using MicroScan system for routine use should consider using a second, independent antimicrobial susceptibility testing method to validate imipenem susceptibility. Etest, whereever available, may be used as an easy method to confirm imipenem susceptibility.</p

Case report: Infective endocarditis caused by Brevundimonas vesicularis

BACKGROUND: There are few reports in the literature of invasive infection caused by Brevundimonas vesicularis in patients without immunosuppression or other predisposing factors. The choice of antimicrobial therapy for bacteremia caused by the pathogen requires more case experience to be determined. CASE PRESENTATION: The case of a 40-year-old previously healthy man with subacute endocarditis proposed to be contributed from an occult dental abscess is described. The infection was found to be caused by B. vesicularis on blood culture results. The patient recovered without sequelae after treatment with ceftriaxone followed by subsequent ciprofloxacin therapy owing to an allergic reaction to ceftriaxone and treatment failure with ampicillin/sulbactam. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first report of B. vesicularis as a cause of infective endocarditis. According to an overview of the literature and our experience, we suggest that third-generation cephalosporins, piperacillin/tazobactam, and ciprofloxacin are effective in treating invasive B. vesicularis infections, while the efficacy of ampicillin-sulbactam needs further evaluation

Evaluation of the best method to assess antibiotic potentiation by phytochemicals against staphylococcus aureus

The increasing occurrence of bacterial resistance to antibiotics has now reached a critical level. Finding antibiotic coadjuvants capable to inhibit the bacterial resistance mechanisms would be a valuable mid-term solution, until new classes of antibiotics are discovered. Selected plant alkaloids were combined with 5 antibiotics against 10 Staphylococcus aureus strains, including strains expressing distinct efflux pumps and methicillin-resistant S. aureus strains. The efficacy of each combination was assessed using the microdilution checkerboard, time-kill, Etest, and disc diffusion methods. The cytotoxicity of the alkaloids was evaluated in a mouse fibroblast cell line. Potentiation was obtained in 6% of all 190 combinations, especially with the combination of: ciprofloxacin with reserpine (RES), pyrrolidine (PYR), and quinine (QUIN); tetracycline with RES; and erythromycin with PYR. The highest cytotoxicity values were found for QUIN (half maximal inhibitory concentration [IC50] = 25 ± 2.2 mg/L) and theophylline (IC50 = 100 ± 4.7 mg/L).The authors are very grateful to Professor Simon Gibbons (Department of Pharmaceutical and Biological Chemistry, The School of Pharmacy, UCL School of Pharmacy, London) for providing some of the bacterial strains. This work was supported by Operational Programme for Competitiveness Factors - COMPETE and by FCT Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology through Projects Bioresist - PTDC/EBB-EBI/105085/2008; Phytodisinfectants - PTDC/DTP-SAP/1078/2012 and the PhD grants awarded to Ana Abreu (SFRH/BD/84393/2012) and Anabela Borges (SFRH/BD/63398/2009)

Antibacterial activity of Artemisia nilagirica leaf extracts against clinical and phytopathogenic bacteria

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The six organic solvent extracts of <it>Artemisia nilagirica </it>were screened for the potential antimicrobial activity against phytopathogens and clinically important standard reference bacterial strains.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>The agar disk diffusion method was used to study the antibacterial activity of <it>A. nilagirica </it>extracts against 15 bacterial strains. The Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) of the plant extracts were tested using two fold agar dilution method at concentrations ranging from 32 to 512 μg/ml. The phytochemical screening of extracts was carried out for major phytochemical derivatives in <it>A. nilagirica</it>.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>All the extracts showed inhibitory activity for gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria except for <it>Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterococcus faecalis </it>and <it>Staphylococcus aureus</it>. The hexane extract was found to be effective against all phytopathogens with low MIC of 32 μg/ml and the methanol extract exhibited a higher inhibition activity against <it>Escherichia coli, Yersinia enterocolitica, Salmonella typhi</it>, <it>Enterobacter aerogenes</it>, <it>Proteus vulgaris</it>, <it>Pseudomonas aeruginosa </it>(32 μg/ml), <it>Bacillus subtilis </it>(64 μg/ml) and <it>Shigella flaxneri </it>(128 μg/ml). The phytochemical screening of extracts answered for the major derivative of alkaloids, amino acids, flavonoids, phenol, quinines, tannins and terpenoids.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>All the extracts showed antibacterial activity against the tested strains. Of all, methanol and hexane extracts showed high inhibition against clinical and phytopathogens, respectively. The results also indicate the presence of major phytochemical derivatives in the <it>A. nilagirica </it>extracts. Hence, the isolation and purification of therapeutic potential compounds from <it>A. nilagirica </it>could be used as an effective source against bacterial diseases in human and plants.</p