23 research outputs found

    What Do Dental Students Think About Mandatory Laptop Programs?

    Full text link
    Peer Reviewedhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/153745/1/jddj002203372006705tb04103x.pd

    Electronic Curriculum Implementation at North American Dental Schools

    Full text link
    Peer Reviewedhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/153722/1/jddj0022033720046810tb03851x.pd

    Teaching Practicum E- Portfolio

    No full text
    For a semester, I student taught 4 math classes at Millbury Memorial Jr. Sr. High School alongside a Mentor Teacher. Throughout the semester, I worked toward improving my organization and classroom management skills by creating lesson plans before the lesson, implementing classroom routines, and establishing high expectations for all students. Also detailed in the e-portfolio is the transition to remote learning amidst the COVID-19 outbreak. To show proficiency in all elements of CAP, a teacher must show that they can plan effective lessons by reflecting on and adjusting them regularly, establishing and enforcing routines, rules and expectations in the classroom, and consistently delivering clear lessons to the students

    Modeling and Analyzing Stock Trends

    No full text
    The goal of this project is to create and compare several different stock prediction models and find a correlation between the predictions and volatility for each stock. The models were created using the historical data, DJI index, and moving averages. The most accurate prediction model had an average of 5.3 days spent within a prediction band. A correlation of -0.0438 was found between that model and a measure of volatility, indicating that more prediction days means lower volatility

    Heterogeneous treatment effects in social policy studies: An assessment of contemporary articles in the health and social sciences.

    No full text
    PurposeSocial policies are important determinants of population health but may have varying effects on subgroups of people. Evaluating heterogeneous treatment effects (HTEs) of social policies is critical to determine how social policies will affect health inequities. Methods for evaluating HTEs are not standardized. Little is known about how often and by what methods HTEs are assessed in social policy and health research.MethodsA sample of 55 articles from 2019 on the health effects of social policies were evaluated for frequency of reporting HTEs; for what subgroupings HTEs were reported; frequency of a priori specification of intent to assess HTEs; and methods used for assessing HTEs.ResultsA total of 24 (44%) studies described some form of HTE assessment, including by age, gender, education, race/ethnicity, and/or geography. Among studies assessing HTEs, 63% specified HTE assessment a priori, and most (71%) used descriptive methods such as stratification; 21% used statistical tests (e.g., interaction terms in a regression); and no studies used data-driven algorithms.ConclusionsAlthough understanding HTEs could enhance policy and practice-based efforts to reduce inequities, it is not routine research practice. Increased evaluation of HTEs across relevant subgroups is needed

    Global surveillance of cancer survival 1995–2009: analysis of individual data for 25 676 887 patients from 279 population-based registries in 67 countries (CONCORD-2)

    Get PDF
    Background: Worldwide data for cancer survival are scarce. We aimed to initiate worldwide surveillance of cancer survival by central analysis of population-based registry data, as a metric of the effectiveness of health systems, and to inform global policy on cancer control. Methods: Individual tumour records were submitted by 279 population-based cancer registries in 67 countries for 25·7 million adults (age 15–99 years) and 75 000 children (age 0–14 years) diagnosed with cancer during 1995–2009 and followed up to Dec 31, 2009, or later. We looked at cancers of the stomach, colon, rectum, liver, lung, breast (women), cervix, ovary, and prostate in adults, and adult and childhood leukaemia. Standardised quality control procedures were applied; errors were corrected by the registry concerned. We estimated 5-year net survival, adjusted for background mortality in every country or region by age (single year), sex, and calendar year, and by race or ethnic origin in some countries. Estimates were age-standardised with the International Cancer Survival Standard weights. Findings: 5-year survival from colon, rectal, and breast cancers has increased steadily in most developed countries. For patients diagnosed during 2005–09, survival for colon and rectal cancer reached 60% or more in 22 countries around the world; for breast cancer, 5-year survival rose to 85% or higher in 17 countries worldwide. Liver and lung cancer remain lethal in all nations: for both cancers, 5-year survival is below 20% everywhere in Europe, in the range 15–19% in North America, and as low as 7–9% in Mongolia and Thailand. Striking rises in 5-year survival from prostate cancer have occurred in many countries: survival rose by 10–20% between 1995–99 and 2005–09 in 22 countries in South America, Asia, and Europe, but survival still varies widely around the world, from less than 60% in Bulgaria and Thailand to 95% or more in Brazil, Puerto Rico, and the USA. For cervical cancer, national estimates of 5-year survival range from less than 50% to more than 70%; regional variations are much wider, and improvements between 1995–99 and 2005–09 have generally been slight. For women diagnosed with ovarian cancer in 2005–09, 5-year survival was 40% or higher only in Ecuador, the USA, and 17 countries in Asia and Europe. 5-year survival for stomach cancer in 2005–09 was high (54–58%) in Japan and South Korea, compared with less than 40% in other countries. By contrast, 5-year survival from adult leukaemia in Japan and South Korea (18–23%) is lower than in most other countries. 5-year survival from childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia is less than 60% in several countries, but as high as 90% in Canada and four European countries, which suggests major deficiencies in the management of a largely curable disease. Interpretation: International comparison of survival trends reveals very wide differences that are likely to be attributable to differences in access to early diagnosis and optimum treatment. Continuous worldwide surveillance of cancer survival should become an indispensable source of information for cancer patients and researchers and a stimulus for politicians to improve health policy and health-care systems
    corecore