18 research outputs found

    Red Argentina de Gravedad Absoluta (RAGA)

    Get PDF
    En el año 2015, el Instituto Geográfico Nacional oficializó la Red Argentina de Gravedad Absoluta (RAGA) medida en el año 2014 por el mencionado instituto en conjunto con la Universidad de San Pablo, las Universidades Nacionales de La Plata, Rosario y San Juan, el IRD (Institut de Recherche pour le Développement) y el BGI (Bureau Gravimétrique International) de Francia con un total de 35 puntos de gravedad absoluta distribuidos a lo largo de todo el Territorio Nacional y uno en la República Oriental del Uruguay.Facultad de Ciencias Astronómicas y Geofísica

    Red Argentina de Gravedad Absoluta (RAGA)

    Get PDF
    En el año 2015, el Instituto Geográfico Nacional oficializó la Red Argentina de Gravedad Absoluta (RAGA) medida en el año 2014 por el mencionado instituto en conjunto con la Universidad de San Pablo, las Universidades Nacionales de La Plata, Rosario y San Juan, el IRD (Institut de Recherche pour le Développement) y el BGI (Bureau Gravimétrique International) de Francia con un total de 35 puntos de gravedad absoluta distribuidos a lo largo de todo el Territorio Nacional y uno en la República Oriental del Uruguay.Facultad de Ciencias Astronómicas y Geofísica

    Red Argentina de Gravedad Absoluta (RAGA)

    Get PDF
    En el año 2015, el Instituto Geográfico Nacional oficializó la Red Argentina de Gravedad Absoluta (RAGA) medida en el año 2014 por el mencionado instituto en conjunto con la Universidad de San Pablo, las Universidades Nacionales de La Plata, Rosario y San Juan, el IRD (Institut de Recherche pour le Développement) y el BGI (Bureau Gravimétrique International) de Francia con un total de 35 puntos de gravedad absoluta distribuidos a lo largo de todo el Territorio Nacional y uno en la República Oriental del Uruguay.Facultad de Ciencias Astronómicas y Geofísica

    Illuminating subduction zone rheological properties in the wake of a giant earthquake

    Get PDF
    Deformation associated with plate convergence at subduction zones is accommodated by a complex system involving fault slip and viscoelastic flow. These processes have proven difficult to disentangle. The 2010 Mw 8.8 Maule earthquake occurred close to the Chilean coast within a dense network of continuously recording Global Positioning System stations, which provide a comprehensive history of surface strain. We use these data to assemble a detailed picture of a structurally controlled megathrust fault frictional patchwork and the three-dimensional rheological and time-dependent viscosity structure of the lower crust and upper mantle, all of which control the relative importance of afterslip and viscoelastic relaxation during postseismic deformation. These results enhance our understanding of subduction dynamics including the interplay of localized and distributed deformation during the subduction zone earthquake cycle

    Analysis of the discrepancies between the vertical reference frames of Argentina and Brazil

    Get PDF
    The vertical reference frames for Argentina and Brazil present discrepancies due to their different datums and realizations. Thus, since 2008, we have started a series of activities with the aim of unifying the Argentine and Brazilian national vertical networks (NVNs). To achieve this goal, we have connected the two NVNs at three border points by using the geodetic levelling approach. Additionally, the gravity field approach was also applied, based on a suitable representation of the geoid by considering the Earth GravitationalModel (EGM2008) in its full resolution. In this regard, 1266 co-located Global Positioning System (GPS) and levelling benchmarks regularly distributed over Argentina (612) and Brazil (654) were considered. The geodetic levelling approach shows an offset value of 54 cm, which implies that the Argentine vertical reference frame is above that of the Brazilian vertical reference frame. However, the result of the gravimetric approach shows an offset of 57 cm, which implies a difference of approximately 3 cm between both methods. Hence, since Brazil and Argentina represent a significant part of South America, the solution to the datum problem between both countries could point towards a common vertical reference frame for the Atlantic side.Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias y Forestale

    Reference frame access under the effects of great earthquakes: a least squares collocation approach for non-secular post-seismic evolution

    No full text
    The 2010, (Mw 8.8) Maule, Chile, earthquake produced large co-seismic displacements and non-secular, post-seismic deformation, within latitudes 28 degrees S-40 degrees S extending from the Pacific to the Atlantic oceans. Although these effects are easily resolvable by fitting geodetic extended trajectory models (ETM) to continuous GPS (CGPS) time series, the co-and post-seismic deformation cannot be determined at locations without CGPS (e.g., on passive geodetic benchmarks). To estimate the trajectories of passive geodetic benchmarks, we used CGPS time series to fit an ETM that includes the secular South American plate motion and plate boundary deformation, the co-seismic discontinuity, and the non-secular, logarithmic post-seismic transient produced by the earthquake in the Posiciones Geodesicas Argentinas 2007 (POSGAR07) reference frame (RF). We then used least squares collocation (LSC) to model both the background secular inter-seismic and the non-secular post-seismic components of the ETM at the locations without CGPS. We tested the LSC modeled trajectories using campaign and CGPS data that was not used to generate the model and found standard deviations (95 % confidence level) for position estimates for the north and east components of 3.8 and 5.5 mm, respectively, indicating that the model predicts the post-seismic deformation field very well. Finally, we added the co-seismic displacement field, estimated using an elastic finite element model. The final, trajectory model allows accessing the POSGAR07 RF using post-Maule earthquake coordinates within 5 cm for similar to 91 % of the passive test benchmarks

    Reference frame access under the effects of great earthquakes: a least squares collocation approach for non-secular post-seismic evolution

    No full text
    The 2010, (Mw 8.8) Maule, Chile, earthquake produced large co-seismic displacements and non-secular, post-seismic deformation, within latitudes 28 (Formula presented.) S–40 (Formula presented.) S extending from the Pacific to the Atlantic oceans. Although these effects are easily resolvable by fitting geodetic extended trajectory models (ETM) to continuous GPS (CGPS) time series, the co- and post-seismic deformation cannot be determined at locations without CGPS (e.g., on passive geodetic benchmarks). To estimate the trajectories of passive geodetic benchmarks, we used CGPS time series to fit an ETM that includes the secular South American plate motion and plate boundary deformation, the co-seismic discontinuity, and the non-secular, logarithmic post-seismic transient produced by the earthquake in the Posiciones Geodésicas Argentinas 2007 (POSGAR07) reference frame (RF). We then used least squares collocation (LSC) to model both the background secular inter-seismic and the non-secular post-seismic components of the ETM at the locations without CGPS. We tested the LSC modeled trajectories using campaign and CGPS data that was not used to generate the model and found standard deviations (95 % confidence level) for position estimates for the north and east components of 3.8 and 5.5 mm, respectively, indicating that the model predicts the post-seismic deformation field very well. Finally, we added the co-seismic displacement field, estimated using an elastic finite element model. The final, trajectory model allows accessing the POSGAR07 RF using post-Maule earthquake coordinates within 5 cm for (Formula presented.) 91 % of the passive test benchmarks

    Co-seismic deformation of the 2010 maule, Chile earthquake: Validating a least squares collocation interpolation

    No full text
    Least squares collocation (LSC) has been successfully applied to develop the Velocity Model for SIRGAS (VEMOS) (Drewes and Heidbach, 2012) used to predict the velocities in the Geocentric Reference System for the Americas (Sistema de Referencia Geocéntrico para las Américas, SIRGAS) GNSS reference frame. After the 2010 (Mw 8.8) Maule, Chile earthquake, the co-seismic and ongoing post-seismic deformation changed both the coordinates and velocities of geodetic benchmarks and continuous operating GPS reference stations (CORS) within the region affected (latitude-28 to-40). This deformation made VEMOS invalid for the estimation of velocities in the reference frame. To correctly obtain coordinates in the pre-seismic frame using post-seismic coordinates, it is necessary to estimate the deformation produced by the earthquake, both co- and post-seismic. Since neither the Argentine nor the Chilean CORS GPS networks are sufficiently dense to directly determine the deformation at arbitrary locations (by using the closest station), a densification of the observations of the deformation field using LSC was recently proposed. In this paper, we used a finite element model (FEM) to simulate the co-seismic deformation of the 2010 Maule earthquake. The FEM was then used to test the LSC of the co-seismic deformation field. We found that LSC cannot be used to correctly predict the behavior of the deformation in the near field due to the complexity of the elastic response of the earth\u27s crust. Nevertheless, the method correctly interpolates the far field deformation. As an alternative to the LSC method, the authors propose to use a finite element geophysical model that allows for a correct approximation of the co-seismic deformation, both in the near and far fields

    Co-seismic deformation of the 2010 maule, Chile earthquake: Validating a least squares collocation interpolation

    No full text
    Least squares collocation (LSC) has been successfully applied to develop the Velocity Model for SIRGAS (VEMOS) (Drewes and Heidbach, 2012) used to predict the velocities in the Geocentric Reference System for the Americas (Sistema de Referencia Geocéntrico para las Américas, SIRGAS) GNSS reference frame. After the 2010 (Mw 8.8) Maule, Chile earthquake, the co-seismic and ongoing post-seismic deformation changed both the coordinates and velocities of geodetic benchmarks and continuous operating GPS reference stations (CORS) within the region affected (latitude-28 to-40). This deformation made VEMOS invalid for the estimation of velocities in the reference frame. To correctly obtain coordinates in the pre-seismic frame using post-seismic coordinates, it is necessary to estimate the deformation produced by the earthquake, both co- and post-seismic. Since neither the Argentine nor the Chilean CORS GPS networks are sufficiently dense to directly determine the deformation at arbitrary locations (by using the closest station), a densification of the observations of the deformation field using LSC was recently proposed. In this paper, we used a finite element model (FEM) to simulate the co-seismic deformation of the 2010 Maule earthquake. The FEM was then used to test the LSC of the co-seismic deformation field. We found that LSC cannot be used to correctly predict the behavior of the deformation in the near field due to the complexity of the elastic response of the earth\u27s crust. Nevertheless, the method correctly interpolates the far field deformation. As an alternative to the LSC method, the authors propose to use a finite element geophysical model that allows for a correct approximation of the co-seismic deformation, both in the near and far fields
    corecore