70-Gene Signature as an Aid to Treatment Decisions in Early-Stage Breast Cancer.

The 70-gene signature test (MammaPrint) has been shown to improve prediction of clinical outcome in women with early-stage breast cancer. We sought to provide prospective evidence of the clinical utility of the addition of the 70-gene signature to standard clinical-pathological criteria in selecting patients for adjuvant chemotherapy. In this randomized, phase 3 study, we enrolled 6693 women with early-stage breast cancer and determined their genomic risk (using the 70-gene signature) and their clinical risk (using a modified version of Adjuvant! Online). Women at low clinical and genomic risk did not receive chemotherapy, whereas those at high clinical and genomic risk did receive such therapy. In patients with discordant risk results, either the genomic risk or the clinical risk was used to determine the use of chemotherapy. The primary goal was to assess whether, among patients with high-risk clinical features and a low-risk gene-expression profile who did not receive chemotherapy, the lower boundary of the 95% confidence interval for the rate of 5-year survival without distant metastasis would be 92% (i.e., the noninferiority boundary) or higher. A total of 1550 patients (23.2%) were deemed to be at high clinical risk and low genomic risk. At 5 years, the rate of survival without distant metastasis in this group was 94.7% (95% confidence interval, 92.5 to 96.2) among those not receiving chemotherapy. The absolute difference in this survival rate between these patients and those who received chemotherapy was 1.5 percentage points, with the rate being lower without chemotherapy. Similar rates of survival without distant metastasis were reported in the subgroup of patients who had estrogen-receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, and either node-negative or node-positive disease. Among women with early-stage breast cancer who were at high clinical risk and low genomic risk for recurrence, the receipt of no chemotherapy on the basis of the 70-gene signature led to a 5-year rate of survival without distant metastasis that was 1.5 percentage points lower than the rate with chemotherapy. Given these findings, approximately 46% of women with breast cancer who are at high clinical risk might not require chemotherapy. (Funded by the European Commission Sixth Framework Program and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00433589; EudraCT number, 2005-002625-31.)

Palliative chemotherapy in elderly patients with common metastatic malignancies: A Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group registry analysis of management, outcome and clinical benefit predictors

Introduction: Cancer in the elderly is a common health issue in developed societies. We sought to present epidemiology, management and outcome data on fit elderly patients with common metastatic cancers and to identify predictors of clinical benefit from palliative chemotherapy. Methods: All patients aged >65 years who were diagnosed with metastatic breast, colorectal or non-small cell lung carcinomas and managed with palliative chemotherapy in the context of Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG) clinical trials or protocols were eligible for electronic data retrieval and analysis. Common eligibility criteria included adequate performance status (ECOG 0-3), organ function and absence of severe co-morbidity forbidding cytotoxic chemotherapy. Results: One thousand three hundred and seventy-two fit patients (PS 0-1 in 73%) with a median age of 70 years diagnosed with metastatic breast (n = 250), colorectal (n = 621) or lung cancer (n = 501) received chemotherapy from 1991 until 2006. Most patients received modem full-dose chemotherapy regimens including platinum, taxanes, anthracyclines, fluoropyrimidines, oxaliplatin or irinotecan. Mild to moderate co-morbidity was present in 35%. At a median follow-up of 3 years, objective responses were seen in 41% of patients with breast cancer, 25% with colorectal cancer and 31% with lung cancer, while median survival was 21, 16 and 9.4 months, respectively. Grade 3 or 4 toxicity was seen in a quarter of patients, the most common being neutropenia (14%), diarrhoea (6%), neurotoxicity (4%), fatigue, nausea and febrile neutropenia (each 2%). In multivariate analysis, diagnosis of colorectal or lung cancer, metastases in multiple organ sites, presence of liver/brain/peritoneal deposits, impaired PS and low baseline serum albumin levels were prognostic factors for adverse outcome. The same factors excluding metastatic sites and with the addition of anemia predicted for resistance to chemotherapy. Toxicity was more likely in females with low serum albumin and renal dysfunction. A six-variable geriatric assessment for palliation (GAP) score that included tumour type, sites of metastatic dissemination, impaired PS, low serum albumin and anemia classified elderly patients to groups with low, intermediate and high risk for disease progression and death (relative risks of 1.59 and 2.50 for resistance to therapy and 1.87 and 3.12 for death in the intermediate and high-risk groups). Conclusions: Our data indicate that relatively fit elderly patients with advanced cancer safely tolerate modern chemotherapy and enjoy disease control in a manner comparable to younger patients. Our GAP score, if further validated, offers promise for geriatric application in combination to comprehensive geriatric assessment tools for the optimisation of palliative therapy on an individualised basis. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved