Wellness: Combating Burnout and Its Consequences in Emergency Medicine

Medicine recognizes burnout as a threat to quality patient care and physician quality of life. This issue exists throughout medicine but is notably prevalent in emergency medicine (EM). Because the concept of "wellness" lacks a clear definition, attempts at ameliorating burnout that focus on achieving wellness make success difficult to achieve and measure. Recent work within the wellness literature suggests that the end goal should be to achieve a culture of wellness by addressing all aspects of the physician's environment. A review of the available literature on burnout and wellness interventions in all medical specialties reveals that interventions focusing on individual physicians have varying levels of success. Efforts to compare these interventions are hampered by a lack of consistent endpoints. Studies with consistent endpoints do not demonstrate clear benefits of achieving them because improving scores on various scales may not equate to improvement in quality of care or physician quality of life. Successful interventions have uncertain, long-term effects. Outside of EM, the most successful interventions focus on changes to systems rather than to individual physicians. Within EM, the number of well-structured interventions that have been studied is limited. Future work to achieve the desired culture of wellness within EM requires establishment of a consistent endpoint that serves as a surrogate for clinical significance, addressing contributors to burnout at all levels, and integrating successful interventions into the fabric of EM

Erratum: This Article Corrects: "Burnout, Drop Out, Suicide: Physician Loss in Emergency Medicine, Part 1"

This corrects the article "Burnout, Drop Out, Suicide: Physician Loss in Emergency Medicine, Part I" on page 485

Ideas to Action: Using Curriculum Design to Develop a “Roadmap to Wellness” Curriculum

Introduction: Physician burnout, well-being, and professional fulfillment are deeply intertwined topics that are increasingly recognized as affecting the lives of physicians, health care workers, and patients alike. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) mandates that all residencies address wellness within the context of residency training without providing much guidance on how to do so. Emergency Medicine organizations such as the American College of Emergency Physicians, the American Academy of Emergency Physicians, the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, and the Council of Residency Directors of Emergency Medicine (CORD) suggest that one method to address wellness is in the form of a curriculum. Successfully developing or modifying a curriculum to work for individual residency programs can be a difficult task. Methods: The CORD Resilience Committee Wellness Curriculum Subcommittee comprised of experts in physician wellness and medical education started by conducted literature searches on terms related to burnout and wellness and searching the internet for documented wellness curricula, models and resources. Using this information and a standard curriculum development process, they created a roadmap for developing (or modifying), initiating, and evaluating a wellness curriculum. Conclusion: Wellness curricula are not a one-size-fits-all situation. Using the checklist and guidelines in this white paper, readers can individualize existing wellness curricula to help foster physician well-being

This Article Corrects: “Burnout, Drop Out, Suicide: Physician Loss in Emergency Medicine, Part 1”

The authors would like to revise the description on the evolution of the definition of burnout in the Introduction. The introduction formerly stated, “Based on his research, Freudenberger used “burnout” as shorthand for a psychological syndrome with three dimensions: emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and reduced personal accomplishment.2 Maslach subsequently summarized the dimensions of burnout as “exhaustion,” “cynicism,” and “inefficacy,” providing more identifiable definitions of each dimension that align well with her measurement tool.3” This should be revised to the following: “Based on his experiences, Freudenberger described the phenomenon of “burn-out”, subsequently defined by Maslach as a psychological syndrome with three dimensions: emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and reduced personal accomplishment.2,3

Burnout, Drop Out, Suicide: Physician Loss in Emergency Medicine, Part I

Each year more than 400 physicians take their lives, likely related to increasing depression and burnout. Burnout—a psychological syndrome featuring emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and a reduced sense of personal accomplishment—is a disturbingly and increasingly prevalent phenomenon in healthcare, and emergency medicine (EM) in particular. As self-care based solutions have proven unsuccessful, more system-based causes, beyond the control of the individual physicians, have been identified. Such system-based causes include limitations of the electronic health record, long work hours and substantial educational debt, all in a culture of “no mistakes allowed.” Blame and isolation in the face of medical errors and poor outcomes may lead to physician emotional injury, the so-called “second victim” syndrome, which is both a contributor to and consequence of burnout. In addition, emergency physicians (EP) are also particularly affected by the intensity of clinical practice, the higher risk of litigation, and the chronic fatigue of circadian rhythm disruption. Burnout has widespread consequences, including poor quality of care, increased medical errors, patient and provider dissatisfaction, and attrition from medical practice, exacerbating the shortage and maldistribution of EPs. Burned-out physicians are unlikely to seek professional treatment and may attempt to deal with substance abuse, depression and suicidal thoughts alone. This paper reviews the scope of burnout, contributors, and consequences both for medicine in general and for EM in particular

Burnout, Drop Out, Suicide: Physician Loss in Emergency Medicine, Part I

Each year more than 400 physicians take their lives, likely related to increasing depression and burnout. Burnout—a psychological syndrome featuring emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and a reduced sense of personal accomplishment—is a disturbingly and increasingly prevalent phenomenon in healthcare, and emergency medicine (EM) in particular. As self-care based solutions have proven unsuccessful, more system-based causes, beyond the control of the individual physicians, have been identified. Such system-based causes include limitations of the electronic health record, long work hours and substantial educational debt, all in a culture of “no mistakes allowed.” Blame and isolation in the face of medical errors and poor outcomes may lead to physician emotional injury, the so-called “second victim” syndrome, which is both a contributor to and consequence of burnout. In addition, emergency physicians (EP) are also particularly affected by the intensity of clinical practice, the higher risk of litigation, and the chronic fatigue of circadian rhythm disruption. Burnout has widespread consequences, including poor quality of care, increased medical errors, patient and provider dissatisfaction, and attrition from medical practice, exacerbating the shortage and maldistribution of EPs. Burned-out physicians are unlikely to seek professional treatment and may attempt to deal with substance abuse, depression and suicidal thoughts alone. This paper reviews the scope of burnout, contributors, and consequences both for medicine in general and for EM in particular

Wellness: Combating Burnout and Its Consequences in Emergency Medicine

Medicine recognizes burnout as a threat to quality patient care and physician quality of life. This issue exists throughout medicine but is notably prevalent in emergency medicine (EM). Because the concept of “wellness” lacks a clear definition, attempts at ameliorating burnout that focus on achieving wellness make success difficult to achieve and measure. Recent work within the wellness literature suggests that the end goal should be to achieve a culture of wellness by addressing all aspects of the physician’s environment. A review of the available literature on burnout and wellness interventions in all medical specialties reveals that interventions focusing on individual physicians have varying levels of success. Efforts to compare these interventions are hampered by a lack of consistent endpoints. Studies with consistent endpoints do not demonstrate clear benefits of achieving them because improving scores on various scales may not equate to improvement in quality of care or physician quality of life. Successful interventions have uncertain, long-term effects. Outside of EM, the most successful interventions focus on changes to systems rather than to individual physicians. Within EM, the number of well-structured interventions that have been studied is limited. Future work to achieve the desired culture of wellness within EM requires establishment of a consistent endpoint that serves as a surrogate for clinical significance, addressing contributors to burnout at all levels, and integrating successful interventions into the fabric of EM

BEDSIDE ESTIMATION OF PATIENT HEIGHT FOR CALCULATING IDEAL BODY WEIGHT IN THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT

Background: Ideal body weight (IBW), which can be calculated using the variables of true height and sex, is important for drug dosing and ventilator settings. True height often cannot be measured in the emergency department (ED). Objectives: Determine the most accurate method to estimate IBW using true height-based IBW that uses true height estimated by providers or patients compared to true height estimated by a regression formula using measured tibial length, and compare all to the conventional 70 kg male/60 kg female standard IBW. Methods: Prospective, observational, double-blind, convenience sampling of stable adult patients in a tertiary care ED from September 2004 to April 2006. Derivation set (215 patients) had blinded provider and patient true height estimates and tibial length measurements compared to gold-standard standing true height. A validation set (102 patients) then compared the accuracy of IBW using true height calculated from the regression formula vs. IBW using gold-standard true height. Regression formula for men tibial length-IBW (kg) = 25.83 + 1.11 × tibial length; for women tibial length-IBW = 7.90 + 1.20 × tibial length; R2 = 0.89, p \u3c 0.001. Inter-rater correlation of tibial length was 0.94. Results: Derivation set: percent within 5 kg of true heightbased IBW for men/women = Patient: 91.1%:/85.7%; Physician: 66.1%/45.1%; Nurse: 65.7%/ 47.3%; tibial length: 66.1%/63.7%; and 70 kg male/60 kg female standard 46%/ 75%. Validation set: tibial length-IBW estimates were within 5 kg of true height-ideal body weight in only 56.2% of men and 42.2% of women. Conclusions: Patient-reported height is the best bedside method to estimate true height to calculate ideal body weight. Physician and nurse estimates of true height are substantially less accurate, as is true height obtained from a regression formula that uses measured tibial length. All methods were more accurate than using the conventional 70 kg male/60 kg female IBW standard

BEDSIDE METHOD TO ESTIMATE ACTUAL BODY WEIGHT IN THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT

Background: Actual body weight (ABW) is important for accurate drug dosing in emergency settings. Oftentimes, patients are unable to stand to be weighed accurately or clearly state their most recent weight. Objective: Develop a bedside method to estimate ABW using simple anthropometric measurements. Methods: Prospective, blinded, cross-sectional convenience sampling of adult Emergency Department (ED) patients. A multiple linear regression equation from Derivation Phase (n = 208: 121 males, 87 females) found abdominal and thigh circumferences (AC and TC) had the best fit and an inter-rater correlation of 0.99 and 0.96, respectively: Male ABW (kg) = -47.8 + 0.78 * (AC) + 1.06 * (TC); Female ABW = -40.2 + 0.47 * (AC) + 1.30 * (TC). Results: Derivation phase: Number of patients (%) with a body weight estimation (BWE) \u3e 10 kg from ABW for males/females were: 7 (6%)/1 (1%)for Patients, 46 (38%)/28 (32%) for Doctors, 38 (31%)/24 (27%) for Nurses, 75 (62%)/43 (49%) for 70 kg/60 kg convention, and 14 (12%)/8 (9%) using the anthropometric regression model. For validation phase (55 males, 44 females): Gold standard ABW mean (SD) male/female = 83.6 kg (14.3)/71.5 kg (18.9) vs. anthropometric regression model = 86.3 kg (14.7)/73.3 kg (15.1). R2 = 0.89, p \u3c 0.001. The number (%) for males/females with aBWE \u3e 10 kg using the anthropometric regression model = 8 (15%)/11 (27%). Conclusions: For male patients, a regression model using supine thigh and abdominal circumference measurements seems to provide a useful and more accurate alternative to physician, nurse, or standard 70-kg male conventional estimates, but was less accurate for use in female patients