10 research outputs found

    Funktionelle Charakterisierung von Pep1, einem sekretierten Effektorprotein von Ustilago maydis

    Get PDF
    Ustilago maydis, der Erreger des Maisbeulenbrandes, benötigt zur Etablierung einer biotrophen Interaktion mit seiner Wirtspflanze Mais eine Vielzahl sekretierter Effektoren. Die Deletion des für den Effektor Pep1 kodierenden Gens um01987 führt zum vollständigen Pathogenitätsverlust. Die Pflanze reagiert auf Penetrationsversuche der Δpep1-Mutante mit der Induktion verschiedener Abwehrreaktionen, was sich z.B. durch die Bildung nekrotischer Läsionen sowie reaktiver Sauerstoffspezies an den Penetrationsstellen zeigt. Pep1 ist zwischen verschiedenen Brandpilzarten konserviert und besteht aus einem N-terminalen Signalpeptid, einem konservierten Kernbereich sowie einem weniger konservierten Glycin- und Serin-reichen C-Terminus. In der vorliegenden Arbeit wurde das heterolog in E. coli exprimierte Pep1 aufgereinigt. Durch biochemische und molekularbiologische Methoden konnten zwei pflanzliche Bindungspartner von Pep1 identifiziert. So konnte mittels Aktivitäts-basiertem Protein-Profiling gezeigt werden, dass Pep1 spezifisch apoplastische Papain-ähnliche Cysteinproteasen inhibiert. Diese Proteasen spielen offenbar eine wichtige Rolle in der Abwehrinduktion in der Maispflanze. Des Weiteren bindet und inaktiviert Pep1 pflanzliche Klasse-III-Häm-Peroxidasen. In Kooperation mit Christoph Hemetsberger konnte die Hemmung der Horseradish-Peroxidase (HRP) durch Pep1 in vitro gezeigt. Außerdem konnte die physische Interaktion von Pep1 mit der HRP bewiesen werden. Während der Δpep1-Infektion wird eine Mais Peroxidase, die sekretierte Peroxidase-12, transkriptionell induziert. Durch Virus-induziertes-Gen-silencing der Peroxidase-12 konnte eine partielle Restauration des Δpep1-Phänotyps auf POX12si-Pflanzen bewirkt werden. So führte das silencing der Peroxidase-12 zu einer Unterdrückung pflanzlicher Abwehrreaktionen, wie z.B. der Papillenbildung, was eine erfolgreiche Penetration der Δpep1-Mutante ermöglichte. Zusammenfassend zeigen diese Ergebnisse, dass Pep1 Enzyme der basalen Pflanzenabwehr inhibiert und somit die angeborene Resistenz der Wirtspflanze gegen U. maydis unterdrückt

    The Ustilago maydis Effector Pep1 Suppresses Plant Immunity by Inhibition of Host Peroxidase Activity

    Get PDF
    The corn smut Ustilago maydis establishes a biotrophic interaction with its host plant maize. This interaction requires efficient suppression of plant immune responses, which is attributed to secreted effector proteins. Previously we identified Pep1 (Protein essential during penetration-1) as a secreted effector with an essential role for U. maydis virulence. pep1 deletion mutants induce strong defense responses leading to an early block in pathogenic development of the fungus. Using cytological and functional assays we show that Pep1 functions as an inhibitor of plant peroxidases. At sites of Δpep1 mutant penetrations, H2O2 strongly accumulated in the cell walls, coinciding with a transcriptional induction of the secreted maize peroxidase POX12. Pep1 protein effectively inhibited the peroxidase driven oxidative burst and thereby suppresses the early immune responses of maize. Moreover, Pep1 directly inhibits peroxidases in vitro in a concentration-dependent manner. Using fluorescence complementation assays, we observed a direct interaction of Pep1 and the maize peroxidase POX12 in vivo. Functional relevance of this interaction was demonstrated by partial complementation of the Δpep1 mutant defect by virus induced gene silencing of maize POX12. We conclude that Pep1 acts as a potent suppressor of early plant defenses by inhibition of peroxidase activity. Thus, it represents a novel strategy for establishing a biotrophic interaction

    Funktionelle Charakterisierung von Pep1, einem sekretierten Effektorprotein von Ustilago maydis

    No full text
    Ustilago maydis, der Erreger des Maisbeulenbrandes, benötigt zur Etablierung einer biotrophen Interaktion mit seiner Wirtspflanze Mais eine Vielzahl sekretierter Effektoren. Die Deletion des für den Effektor Pep1 kodierenden Gens um01987 führt zum vollständigen Pathogenitätsverlust. Die Pflanze reagiert auf Penetrationsversuche der Δpep1-Mutante mit der Induktion verschiedener Abwehrreaktionen, was sich z.B. durch die Bildung nekrotischer Läsionen sowie reaktiver Sauerstoffspezies an den Penetrationsstellen zeigt. Pep1 ist zwischen verschiedenen Brandpilzarten konserviert und besteht aus einem N-terminalen Signalpeptid, einem konservierten Kernbereich sowie einem weniger konservierten Glycin- und Serin-reichen C-Terminus. In der vorliegenden Arbeit wurde das heterolog in E. coli exprimierte Pep1 aufgereinigt. Durch biochemische und molekularbiologische Methoden konnten zwei pflanzliche Bindungspartner von Pep1 identifiziert. So konnte mittels Aktivitäts-basiertem Protein-Profiling gezeigt werden, dass Pep1 spezifisch apoplastische Papain-ähnliche Cysteinproteasen inhibiert. Diese Proteasen spielen offenbar eine wichtige Rolle in der Abwehrinduktion in der Maispflanze. Des Weiteren bindet und inaktiviert Pep1 pflanzliche Klasse-III-Häm-Peroxidasen. In Kooperation mit Christoph Hemetsberger konnte die Hemmung der Horseradish-Peroxidase (HRP) durch Pep1 in vitro gezeigt. Außerdem konnte die physische Interaktion von Pep1 mit der HRP bewiesen werden. Während der Δpep1-Infektion wird eine Mais Peroxidase, die sekretierte Peroxidase-12, transkriptionell induziert. Durch Virus-induziertes-Gen-silencing der Peroxidase-12 konnte eine partielle Restauration des Δpep1-Phänotyps auf POX12si-Pflanzen bewirkt werden. So führte das silencing der Peroxidase-12 zu einer Unterdrückung pflanzlicher Abwehrreaktionen, wie z.B. der Papillenbildung, was eine erfolgreiche Penetration der Δpep1-Mutante ermöglichte. Zusammenfassend zeigen diese Ergebnisse, dass Pep1 Enzyme der basalen Pflanzenabwehr inhibiert und somit die angeborene Resistenz der Wirtspflanze gegen U. maydis unterdrückt

    Pep1 directly inhibits peroxidase activity.

    No full text
    <p>(<b>A</b>) Measurement of HRP activity using an <i>in vitro</i> DAB assay. Dark coloration indicates peroxidase activity, visualized by the precipitation of DAB. The addition of purified GFP as well as heat inactivated Pep1 (Pep1<sub>IA</sub>) does not interfere with HRP activity. Addition of 5 µM native Pep1 results in reduced DAB precipitation, indicating suppressed HRP activity. (<b>B</b>) Quantification of DAB based HRP activity assay. Different concentrations of Pep1 were added to the assay solution at two different relevant pH values. Pep1 exhibits the ability of concentration dependent suppression of HRP activity at pH 6.5 and 7.5. (<b>C</b>) Far Western blot shows physical interaction of HRP with Pep1 (18.5 kDa) but not GFP (29.8 kDa) (upper panel). As a loading control, a separate gel was equally loaded and stained with coomassie blue (lower panel). (<b>D</b>) Peroxidase activity of maize apoplastic fluid was determined in a quantitative DAB assay. Recombinant native Pep1 and heat inactivated Pep1 (Pep1<sub>IA</sub>) were added to the reaction in respective concentrations. Data represent three biological replicates. P values have been calculated by an unpaired <i>t</i> test. Error bars show SEM. * P≤0.05.</p

    <i>In vivo</i> interaction of Pep1 with POX12.

    No full text
    <p>Confocal images in (A) and (B) show <i>N. benthamiana</i> epidermal cells expressing BiFC constructs. (<b>A</b>) A plant cell co-expressing pSPYCE_C and pSPYNE_Pep1. Blue and red channels show apoplastic co-localization of the respective signals. No complementation of fluorescence is observed in the YFP channel. (<b>B</b>) A cell co-expressing pSPYCE_POX12 and pSPYNE_Pep1. Both signals co-localize in the apoplast. The YFP channel exhibits YFP fluorescence with the same localization pattern indicating restoration of the YFP complex due to direct interaction of POX12 and Pep1. Bars: 25 µm. (<b>C</b>) Yeast-Two-Hybrid experiment confirming interaction of Pep1 and POX12. Mutation of the putative active site of POX12 (POX12<sub>m</sub>) did not abolish interaction with Pep1.</p

    Characterization of plant defense responses to Δ<i>pep1</i> infections.

    No full text
    <p>(<b>A</b>) Appressorium (arrow) and penetrating hypha (arrow heads) of SG200RFP 24 hpi. Aniline blue staining indicates callose deposition at point of penetration which is suppressed upon establishment of biotrophy and intracellular growth. (<b>B</b>) Penetration attempts of SG200Δpep1RFP 24 hpi. Staining reveals formation of papillae below appressoria (arrows) and surrounding short invading hyphae. White bars: 20 µm. (<b>C</b>) TEM analysis of SG200 hypha in maize epidermis cell, stained with cerium chloride (CeCl<sub>3</sub>). The plant plasma membrane (arrow heads) surrounds the invading hypha (H). Magnification of the biotrophic interface shows no signs of CeCl<sub>3</sub> staining (inset). V: plant vacuole, C: plant cytosol, UCW: <i>Ustilago maydis</i> cell wall, PCW: plant cell wall, M: mitochondrium, chevrons: tonoplast. (<b>D</b>) TEM picture of SG200Δpep1 invasion hypha (H) in maize epidermis cell. CeCl<sub>3</sub> staining localizes at the biotrophic interface (arrows), revealing accumulation of ROS (magnification, upper right). Tonoplast (chevrons) is ruptured (arrow heads), indicating an induced hypersensitive response of the penetrated cell (inset, lower left). Black bars: 1 µm.</p

    Silencing of <i>pox12</i> suppresses maize penetration resistance to the <i>Δpep1</i> mutant.

    No full text
    <p>(<b>A</b>) (left panel): Aniline blue staining of control plants (BMV-YFPsi) show formation of papillae at points of SG200Δpep1 penetration attempts. SG200Δpep1 is arrested directly upon penetration. (right panel): <i>pox12</i>-silenced (BMV-POX12si) maize plants infected with SG200Δpep1. Strain SG200Δpep1 successfully penetrates epidermal cells (arrows), shows cell to cell penetrations (arrow heads) and reaches the mesophyll layer (M, chevron) without eliciting visible plant defense responses. Bars: 10 µm (<b>B</b>) Quantification of intracellular hyphae length of <i>U. maydis</i> SG200Δpep1 on <i>pox12</i>-silencing plants compared to control plants. Silencing of <i>pox12</i> led to a significant, ∼10-fold increase in length of intracellular SG200Δpep1 hyphae. (<b>C</b>) <i>pox12</i> expression was quantified by quantitative real-time PCR using leaf samples of 8 independent <i>pox12</i>-silenced plants (BMV/POX12si) and 7 control plants (BMV/YFPsi) 48 h after <i>U. maydis</i> SG200Δpep1 infection (for details see <a href="http://www.plospathogens.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.ppat.1002684#s4" target="_blank">methods</a> section). Relative expression of <i>pox12</i> in BMV/YFPsi control plants was averaged and set to 1. Data represent three biological replicates. P values have been calculated by an unpaired <i>t</i> test. Error bars show SEM. * P≤0.05.</p

    Inhibition of the elicitor triggered oxidative burst in maize leaves.

    No full text
    <p>(<b>A</b>) Luminol based readout to determine H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> production in maize leaf discs. The oxidative burst was elicited by the addition of chitosan (2.5 mg/ml) one minute after starting the measurement. Concentrations of recombinant Pep1, Pep1<sub>IA</sub> and GFP proteins: 10 µM. (<b>B</b>) Quantification of elicitor triggered H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> production in maize leaf discs. The bars represent the integrated signal intensity of the average of 6 independent samples over the first 5 min after elicitation. (<b>C</b>) Quantification of chitosan induced H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> production in maize leaf discs based on xylenol orange staining. The peroxidase inhibitor SHAM (2 mM), NADPH-oxidase inhibitor DPI (5 µM) as well recombinant Pep1 protein (10 µM) cause a significant reduction of H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>. Heat inactivated Pep1 (Pep1<sub>IA</sub>) does not influence the elicitor triggered oxidative burst. Data represent three biological replicates. P values have been calculated by an unpaired <i>t</i> test. Error bars show SEM. * P≤0.05.</p

    Scavenging of reactive oxygen species suppresses maize penetration resistance to the <i>Δpep1</i> mutant.

    No full text
    <p>(<b>A</b>) Aniline blue staining of SG200Δpep1RFP attempting to penetrate maize epidermis cell, 24 hpi. A papilla is formed at the point of penetration (arrow). (<b>B</b>) SG200Δpep1RFP penetrating the maize epidermis of plants treated with 5 µM ascorbate. Arrows mark penetration sites. The invading hyphae succeed in cell to cell penetrations (arrow heads); in some cases, proliferation of the hypha could be observed (chevron). (<b>C</b>) SG200Δpep1RFP on maize leaves expressing PIN1-YFP. Enhanced autofluorescence of penetrated cells as well as cells surrounding the penetration event indicate a HR reaction of the plant. (<b>D</b>) SG200Δpep1RFP is able to penetrate PIN1-YFP expressing maize leaves after the treatment with 5 µM ascorbate without eliciting enhanced autofluorescence. Bars: 20 µm. (<b>E</b>) Quantification of the length of intracellularly growing hyphae of SG200Δpep1 in maize leaves treated with 5 µM ascorbate compared to mock treated leaves. The addition of ascorbate leads to an average 6-fold increase of hyphal length. (<b>F</b>) Quantification of maize epidermal cells expressing visual signs of HR per penetration attempt by SG200Δpep1. The ascorbate treated plants show a ∼45% decrease in HR symptoms compared to the mock treated plants. Data represent three biological replicates. P values have been calculated by an unpaired <i>t</i> test. Error bars show SEM. * P≤0.05.</p

    Regulation of JA and SA associated maize marker genes in response to <i>U. maydis</i> wild type versus SG200Δpep1 infections.

    No full text
    <p>Expression levels of SA/JA marker genes were determined by quantitative real-time PCR. The expression values represent three biological replicates and are shown relative to <i>GAPDH</i> expression in each sample. Leaf samples of mock, SG200 or SG200Δpep1 infected plants were taken after 2 dpi. Expression levels in mock infected plants were set to 1 and relative expression of marker genes was calculated for SG200 (light grey bars) and SG200Δpep1 (dark grey bars) samples. (<b>A</b>) Expression of SA marker genes <i>atfp4</i>, <i>pox12</i> and <i>pr1</i> 24 hours after infection with strain SG200Δpep1 or SG200, respectively. (<b>B</b>) Expression of JA marker genes <i>cc9</i> and <i>bbi</i> after infection with strain SG200Δpep1 or SG200, respectively. Data represent three biological replicates. P values have been calculated by an unpaired <i>t</i> test. Error bars show SEM. * P≤0.05.</p
    corecore