A Twistor Formulation of the Non-Heterotic Superstring with Manifest Worldsheet Supersymmetry

We propose a new formulation of the $D=3$ type II superstring which is manifestly invariant under both target-space $N=2$ supersymmetry and worldsheet $N=(1,1)$ super reparametrizations. This gives rise to a set of twistor (commuting spinor) variables, which provide a solution to the two Virasoro constraints. The worldsheet supergravity fields are shown to play the r\^ole of auxiliary fields.Comment: 21p., LaTe

Tensionless String in the Notoph Background

We study the interaction between a tensionless (null) string and an antisymmetric background field B_{ab} using a 2-component spinor formalism. A geometric condition for the absence of such an interaction is formulated. We show that only one gauge-invariant degree of freedom of the field B_{ab} does not satisfy this condition. Identification of this degree of freedom with the notoph field \phi of Ogievetskii-Polubarinov-Kalb-Ramond is suggested. Application of a two-component spinor formalism allows us a reduction of the complete system of non-linear partial differential equations and constraints governing the interacting null string dynamics to a system of linear differential equations for the basis spinors of the spin-frame. We find that total effect of the interaction is contained in a single derivation coefficient which is identified with the notoph field.Comment: 15 pages, no figures, RevTeX 3.

New Superembeddings for Type II Superstrings

Possible ways of generalization of the superembedding approach for the supersurfaces with the number of Grassmann directions being less than the half of that for the target superspace are considered on example of Type II superstrings. Focus is on n=(1,1) superworldsheet embedded into D=10 Type II superspace that is of the interest for establishing a relation with the NSR string.Comment: 26 pages, LaTeX, JHEP.cls and JHEP.bst style files are used; v2: misprints corrected, comments, acknowledgments, references adde

Generalized action principle and extrinsic geometry for N=1 superparticle

It is proposed the generalized action functional for N=1 superparticle in D=3,4,6 and 10 space-time dimensions. The superfield geometric approach equations describing superparticle motion in terms of extrinsic geometry of the worldline superspace are obtained on the base of the generalized action. The off-shell superdiffeomorphism invariance (in the rheonomic sense) of the superparticle generalized action is proved. It was demonstrated that the half of the fermionic and one bosonic (super)fields disappear from the generalized action in the analytical basis. Superparticle interaction with Abelian gauge theory is considered in the framework of this formulation. The geometric approach equations describing superparticle motion in Abelian background are obtained.Comment: 31 pages. Late

SUPERSTRINGS AND SUPERMEMBRANES IN THE DOUBLY SUPERSYMMETRIC GEOMETRICAL APPROACH

We perform a generalization of the geometrical approach to describing extended objects for studying the doubly supersymmetric twistor--like formulation of super--p--branes. Some basic features of embedding world supersurface into target superspace specified by a geometrodynamical condition are considered. It is shown that the main attributes of the geometrical approach, such as the second fundamental form and extrinsic torsion of the embedded surface, and the Codazzi, Gauss and Ricci equations, have their doubly supersymmetric counterparts. At the same time the embedding of supersurface into target superspace has its particular features. For instance, the embedding may cause more rigid restrictions on the geometrical properties of the supersurface. This is demonstrated with the examples of an N=1 twistor--like supermembrane in D=11 and type II superstrings in D=10, where the geometrodynamical condition causes the embedded supersurface to be minimal and puts the theories on the mass shell.Comment: 45 pages, LaTeX, 3 appendicie

Three approaches to data analysis

In this book, the following three approaches to data analysis are presented:  - Test Theory, founded by Sergei V. Yablonskii (1924-1998); the first publications appeared in 1955 and 1958, -           Rough Sets, founded by Zdzisław I. Pawlak (1926-2006); the first publications appeared in 1981 and 1982, -           Logical Analysis of Data, founded by Peter L. Hammer (1936-2006); the first publications appeared in 1986 and 1988. These three approaches have much in common, but researchers active in one of these areas often have a limited knowledge about the results and methods developed in the other two. On the other hand, each of the approaches shows some originality and we believe that the exchange of knowledge can stimulate further development of each of them. This can lead to new theoretical results and real-life applications and, in particular, new results based on combination of these three data analysis approaches can be expected