21 research outputs found

    Scatterplot of ICP (mm Hg) and different nICP estimators between patients (N = 64).

    No full text
    <p>(A) ONSD method (R = 0.76); (B) FV<sub>sv</sub> (R = 0.72); (C) nICP estimator based on the combination of ONSD and FV<sub>sv</sub> (nICPONSD+FV<sub>sv</sub>, R = 0.80). Dark grey shaded areas on the plots represent 95% confidence intervals for the linear regressions; light grey shaded areas on the plots represent the 95% prediction intervals for the linear regressions. ICP, intracranial pressure; nICP, non-invasive intracranial pressure; ONSD, optic nerve sheath diameter.</p

    Receiver operating characteristic analysis for different nICP predictors for a threshold of ICP ≥ 20 mm Hg.

    No full text
    <p>(A) ONSD method; (B) FV<sub>sv</sub>; (C) nICP estimator based on the combination of ONSD and FV<sub>sv</sub> (nICPONSD+FV<sub>sv</sub>). The values shown on the curve in (A) and (B) represent the best thresholds (cutoff values presenting the best sensitivity and specificity [in parentheses]) for prediction of intracranial hypertension (ICP ≥ 20 mm Hg), respectively, for ONSD and FV<sub>sv</sub>. AUC is presented followed by the 95% confidence interval. AUC, area under the curve; FV<sub>sv</sub>, straight sinus systolic flow velocity; ICP, intracranial pressure; nICP, non-invasive intracranial pressure; ONSD, optic nerve sheath diameter.</p

    Distribution of Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) Score (%) versus the binned difference between the median cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) and optimal CPP (CPPopt).

    No full text
    <p>(A) Distribution of GOS Score versus the binned difference between median CPP and CPPopt _PRx; (B) Distribution of GOS Score versus the binned difference between median CPP and CPPopt _wPRx. CPPopt_PRx, optimal cerebral perfusion pressure according to pressure reactivity index (PRx); CPPopt_wPRx, optimal cerebral perfusion pressure according to wavelet PRx.</p
    corecore