21 research outputs found
Boxplots of the analysis of variance of ICP and ONSD between patients who survived and those who died.
<p>(A) ICP; (B) ONSD. The mean ONSD between patients who survived and died was significantly different. ICP, intracranial pressure; ONSD, optic nerve sheath diameter.</p
Scatterplot of ICP (mm Hg) and different nICP estimators between patients (N = 64).
<p>(A) ONSD method (R = 0.76); (B) FV<sub>sv</sub> (R = 0.72); (C) nICP estimator based on the combination of ONSD and FV<sub>sv</sub> (nICPONSD+FV<sub>sv</sub>, R = 0.80). Dark grey shaded areas on the plots represent 95% confidence intervals for the linear regressions; light grey shaded areas on the plots represent the 95% prediction intervals for the linear regressions. ICP, intracranial pressure; nICP, non-invasive intracranial pressure; ONSD, optic nerve sheath diameter.</p
Median (IQR) values of the studied parameters.
<p>Median (IQR) values of the studied parameters.</p
Summary of the linear mixed effects models of ICP and the non-invasive estimators across all measurement points (N = 445).
<p>Summary of the linear mixed effects models of ICP and the non-invasive estimators across all measurement points (N = 445).</p
Receiver operating characteristic analysis for different nICP predictors for a threshold of ICP ≥ 20 mm Hg.
<p>(A) ONSD method; (B) FV<sub>sv</sub>; (C) nICP estimator based on the combination of ONSD and FV<sub>sv</sub> (nICPONSD+FV<sub>sv</sub>). The values shown on the curve in (A) and (B) represent the best thresholds (cutoff values presenting the best sensitivity and specificity [in parentheses]) for prediction of intracranial hypertension (ICP ≥ 20 mm Hg), respectively, for ONSD and FV<sub>sv</sub>. AUC is presented followed by the 95% confidence interval. AUC, area under the curve; FV<sub>sv</sub>, straight sinus systolic flow velocity; ICP, intracranial pressure; nICP, non-invasive intracranial pressure; ONSD, optic nerve sheath diameter.</p
Correlations between ICP and non-invasive estimators across all measurement points (N = 445) and for average values between patients (N = 64).
<p>Correlations between ICP and non-invasive estimators across all measurement points (N = 445) and for average values between patients (N = 64).</p
Baseline characteristics of the patient cohort.
<p>Baseline characteristics of the patient cohort.</p
Summary of the 95% prediction and confidence intervals (± standard deviations) for the linear regression between intracranial pressure and non-invasive estimators between patients (N = 64).
<p>Summary of the 95% prediction and confidence intervals (± standard deviations) for the linear regression between intracranial pressure and non-invasive estimators between patients (N = 64).</p
The ability of PRx/wPRx in distinguishing fatal and nonfatal outcomes.
<p>The ability of PRx/wPRx in distinguishing fatal and nonfatal outcomes.</p
Distribution of Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) Score (%) versus the binned difference between the median cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) and optimal CPP (CPPopt).
<p>(A) Distribution of GOS Score versus the binned difference between median CPP and CPPopt _PRx; (B) Distribution of GOS Score versus the binned difference between median CPP and CPPopt _wPRx. CPPopt_PRx, optimal cerebral perfusion pressure according to pressure reactivity index (PRx); CPPopt_wPRx, optimal cerebral perfusion pressure according to wavelet PRx.</p