Social movements and health: a participatory action-research. New practices in health promotion based on the principles of collective, commons and the sustainability of the planet

Il lavoro origina dalla ricerca-azione “The contribution of civil society organisations in achieving health for all”, finanziata dall'International Development Research Centre e realizzata dal People's Health Movement in sei Paesi (Brasile, Colombia, India, Italia, Repubblica Democratica del Congo, Sudafrica). Obiettivo è indagare i processi con cui l'attivazione della società civile, indirizzata a promuovere l'accesso ai servizi sanitari e agire sui determinanti sociali, contribuisce al diritto alla salute. Trattandosi di una ricerca-azione, rafforzare tali dinamiche è parte tanto degli obiettivi quanto della metodologia. Il materiale analizzato per la tesi riguarda principalmente il contesto italiano, dove la ricerca-azione è portata avanti da un soggetto collettivo denominato Grup-pa (“Gruppo Permanentemente Aperto”). Attraverso due fasi di lavoro, la prima caratterizzata dal coinvolgimento di realtà attive sui temi della salute e dei suoi determinanti, la seconda dalla condivisione/rielaborazione dei risultati preliminari in contesti pubblici, la ricerca-azione – tutt'ora in corso – ha come obiettivo la costruzione di un movimento per la salute. Per la redazione della tesi ho tratto ampio spunto da questo percorso, nonché da suggestioni provenienti dalla ricerca-azione internazionale, per proporre tre contributi che le pratiche dei movimenti offrono alla promozione della salute. La prima esplorazione parte dall'analisi dei movimenti di riforma sanitaria in Italia e in Brasile e riguarda l'idea di collettivo, come processo intensivo in grado di promuovere cambiamento verso la giustizia sociale. La seconda parte dal concetto di comune come principio politico, e prova a leggere la produzione dei movimenti come creazione di nuove istituzioni. La terza esplorazione ricerca, nella salute pubblica e nei movimenti, un'attenzione alle interrelazioni tra società umana, modi di produzione e sostenibilità ambientale, che rischiano di vanificare qualunque approccio di promozione della salute se radicato in un modello di sviluppo distruttivo del pianeta.My PhD work is framed in the action-research "The contribution of civil society organisations in achieving health for all", financed by the Canadian International Development Research Centre and lead by the People's Health Movement in six countries (Brazil, Colombia, India, Italy, DR Congo, South Africa). The objective is to analyse how civil society engagement around access to healthcare and action on the social determinants of health contributes to “health for all”. According to the very principle of action-research, strengthening civil society is part of the objective and of the methodology. The data analysed for the theses concern primarily the Italian context, where the action-research is lead by a collective named Grup-pa (“Permanently Open Group”). The work has developed in phase 1, centred on engaging civil society groups active on issues related to health and its determinants, and phase 2, dedicated to re-discussing publicly the preliminary results. The action-research, ongoing, has the goal of creating a health movement in Italy. In writing the theses I have deeply drawn from this process, and from inputs of the international action-research, in order to explore three contributions that movements can offer to the field of health promotion. The first “path” analyses the health reforms in Italy and Brazil, and – drawing from Latin American Social Medicine theory – frames the principle of “collective” as an intensive process able to promote change towards social justice. The second “path” analyses the idea of commons as a political principle, framing movements' productions as creation of new institutions. The third “path” looks at public health and health movements awareness of the interconnections between human society, modes of production and environmental sustainability, that risk to jeopardize any health promotion effort which is rooted in a development model that is destructive for the planet

Airways flat angioma misdiagnosed as difficult asthma in an adolescent

A 15 years-old boy came to our attention with a diagnosis of poorly controlled asthma. This case required thorough investigations: CT scan imaging revealed a flat angioma extending from the carina to the left main bronchus. Rigid bronchoscopy confirmed the presence of an angioma showing widespread mucosal diffusion involving most of the posterior tracheal wall and main bronchi, on the left side. We present this case report and these images to readers seeking for other experiences in the diagnosis of wide superficial bronchial angioma in pediatric age

The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on psychiatric rehabilitation in residential facilities: perspectives of staff and residents

The coronavirus pandemic imposed significant changes in the care of patients in psychiatric residential facilities, especially during lockdown periods. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of the pandemic on patients and staff of psychiatric residential facilities (RFs). This cross-sectional survey was conducted between 30 June and 30 July 2021 and involved 31 RFs located in the province of Verona (Italy). In total, 170 staff members and 272 residents participated in this study. Staff showing clinically significant symptoms of anxiety, depression and burnout were, respectively, 7.7%, 14.2% and 6%. Staff were concerned about the risk that COVID-19 infection might spread among residents (67.6%) and that residents could not receive an acceptable service due to service reconfiguration because of the pandemic (50.3%). Residents found it very unpleasant not to be permitted to attend family members (85.3%), and not to be allowed to engage in outdoor activities due to the restrictions (84%). Both staff and residents agree that the main problematic areas for the residents was the interdiction to meet family members or friends and the interdiction to outdoor activities, whereas problems related to the COVID-19 infection were considered by the staff members as more frequently problematic than reported by residents. The COVID-19 pandemic had a significant impact on the rehabilitation care and recovery journeys of the residents of psychiatric RFs. Therefore, sustained, and careful attention is needed to ensure that the rehabilitation needs of people with severe mental disorders are not neglected in time of pandemics. Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40737-023-00343-6

The sustained psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on health care workers one year after the outbreak-a repeated cross-sectional survey in a tertiary hospital of North-East Italy

: This study aimed to evaluate the mental health outcomes of health care workers (HCWs) of the Verona academic hospital trust (Italy) one year after the outbreak of COVID-19 and to identify predicted risk factors. A web-based survey was conducted from mid-April to mid-May 2021 on hospital workers one year after the first evaluation performed during the lock-down phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. Post-traumatic stress, general anxiety, depression, and burnout were assessed by using, respectively, the impact of event scale (IES-R), the self-rating anxiety scale (SAS), the patient health questionnaire (PHQ-9) and the Maslach burnout inventory-general survey (MBI-GS). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with each of the four mental health outcomes one year after the COVID-19 outbreak. A total of 1033 HCWs participated. The percentage of HCWs scoring above the cut-off increased from 2020 to 2021 in all of the outcome domains (anxiety, 50.1% vs. 55.7, p < 0.05; depression, 26.6% vs. 40.6%, p < 0.001; burnout, 28.6% vs. 40.6%, p < 0.001; chi-square test), with the exception of post-traumatic distress. There was also an increase when stratifying by occupation and workplace, with a greater increase for depression and burnout. Multivariate analysis revealed that, one year after the COVID-19 outbreak, nurses were at the greatest risk of anxiety and depression, whereas residents were at the greatest risk of burnout (in terms of low professional efficacy). Working in intensive care units was associated with an increased risk of developing severe emotional exhaustion and a cynical attitude towards work

Health equity during COVID-19: A qualitative study on the consequences of the syndemic on refugees’ and asylum seekers’ health in reception centres in Bologna (Italy)

Background As coronavirus infection spread across the world, the dramatic consequences of Sars-CoV-2 and confinement measures highlighted the disparities within our society, impacting more severely on the wellbeing of the most disadvantaged groups of people, such as migrants. The structural characteristics of reception centres create many challenges in the implementation of measures to contrast the diffusion of the virus, putting refugees and asylum seekers (RAS) even more at risk. For these reasons, we carried out a qualitative study to analyze the impact of the syndemic on the health of RAS who reside in reception facilities in Bologna (one of the cities with the highest number of migrants in Italy) and the measures that were introduced to contrast the diffusion of Sars-CoV-2. Methods Between April and September 2020, we interviewed 25 professionals and volunteers who were critical in the management of the COVID-19 epidemic in reception centres. Key-informants were selected through a snowball sampling process and covered various professions (i.e. doctors, nurses, social workers, psychologists, cultural mediators, anthropologists, lawyers). The semi-structured interviews explored the consequences of COVID-19 on the health of RAS living in reception centres, the measures implemented to contrast the diffusion of the epidemic and the challenges that interviewees had in handling the emergency. After transcription, the interviews were analyzed using deductive and inductive approaches. Results All key-informants agreed to participate in the study. Even though various measures were implemented in reception centres (i.e. mass quarantine, supply of personal protective equipment, risk communication campaigns and specific governance tools) they often had a discriminatory approach towards migrants and only considered the biomedical aspects of COVID-19, excluding its social roots and repercussions. This factor, together with the lack of an effective governance system at both the local and the national level, was the most relevant issue associated with the management of the syndemic in reception facilities and affected all the social determinants that shape the health profile of RAS. Conclusions The study revealed the importance of social factors in the management of the syndemic in reception centres. It also highlighted how the underlying causes of the impact of COVID-19 are tightly correlated to the political and social approaches of local and national institutions to migration. In order to guarantee the well-being of society as a whole and successfully control the epidemic, it is necessary to consider migration as a human reality rather than an emergency, and demolish all the policies and bureaucratic systems that act as structural violence on RAS. This process brings into play different levels of responsibility and many action plans. We need to develop intersectoral collaborations for more holistic and interconnected practices, while investing the resources to build a worthy reception system and effective social protection programs. This way it will be possible to develop more inclusive approaches to public health and guarantee the conditions for RAS' empowerment

How to stop public health conferences becoming trade fairs.

Reflecting the new wave of global public health, which now seems to be finally reoriented towards embracing its social mission and responsibilities, the 12th World Congress on Public Health, recently held in Istanbul, dedicated many of its sessions to ethics and the right to health. Indeed, the Congress title, 'Making a Difference in Global Public Health: Education, Research and Practice', sounded like a call to action. But faultless theory and socially responsible state- ments, set out and declared in Istanbul, were accompanied by corporate sponsorship which we see as inappropriate, and sessions that were in conflict with the interests of public health. This commentary reflects the views of a number of participants at the Congress about the corporate influence on public health conferences and, more generally, inap- propriate corporate influence on public health teaching, research and practice

Changes in emergency psychiatric consultations in time of COVID-19: a retrospective observational study in the Verona Academic Hospital over the two pandemic years 2020-2021

Background: During the first months of the COVID-19 pandemic, local health authorities in most Italian regions prescribed a reduction of ordinary outpatient and community mental health care. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on access to the emergency departments (ED) for psychiatric consultation in the pandemic years 2020 and 2021 compared to 2019. Methods: This is a retrospective study conducted by using routinely collected administrative data of the two EDs of the Verona Academic Hospital Trust (Verona, Italy). All ED psychiatry consultations registered from 01.01.2020 to 31.12.2021 were compared with those registered in the pre-pandemic year (01.01.2019 to 31.12.2019). The association between each recorded characteristic and the year considered was estimated by chi-square or Fisher's exact test. Results: A significant reduction was observed between 2020 and 2019 (-23.3%) and between 2021 and 2019 (-16.3%). This reduction was most evident in the lockdown period of 2020 (-40.3%) and in the phase corresponding to the second and third pandemic waves (-36.1%). In 2021, young adults and people with diagnosis of psychosis showed an increase in requests for psychiatric consultation. Conclusions: Fear of contagion may have been an important factor in the overall reduction in psychiatric consultations. However, psychiatric consultations for people with psychosis and for young adults increased. This finding underlines the need for mental health services to implement alternative outreach strategies aimed to support, in times of crisis, these vulnerable segments of the population

Effectiveness of a Mindful Compassion Care Program in reducing burnout and psychological distress amongst frontline hospital nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Background: Recent studies have shown that nurses have been more affected by the COVID-19 pandemic than any other group of hospital workers in terms of anxiety, depression, and burnout. Several clinical studies had previously demonstrated the effectiveness of mindfulness and compassion interventions in reducing burnout and emotional distress amongst healthcare professionals. Methods and analysis: A parallel-group randomized controlled trial will assess the feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of a mindfulness and compassion-focused programme on frontline nurses who had been working during the COVID-19 pandemic. Seventy-two participants will be recruited from Verona University Hospital Trust (Veneto Region, north-east Italy) and will be divided equally into an intervention group and a control group. Primary outcome will be assessed using the Emotional Exhaustion subscale of the Maslach Burnout Inventory General Survey (MBI-GS). Secondary outcomes will be measured by the Cynicism and Professional Efficacy subscales of the MBI-GS, the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), the Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7), the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), the Impact of Stressful Events (IES-R), the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ), and the Forms of Self-Criticising/attacking and Self-Reassuring Scale (FSCRS). Discussion: The study aims to fill a gap in the literature and present a scientifically validated intervention for those healthcare professionals most exposed to the stressful conditions of working during the COVID-19 pandemic. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov; Identifier: NCT05308537

The transformative potential of health as a Commons

Italy was a participating country in the People’s Health Movement multi-centred action-research project (Civil Society Engagement for Health for All). The Italian team, a collective named Grup-pa, undertook several participatory action-research activities including, in a first phase, a mapping of groups active in fields linked to the social determination of health and health promotion, through individual and collective interviews. In a second phase, three public workshops, structured around the exchange of practices, focused on key themes emerged from phase one. A major construct originated from this work, centred around the co-construction of experiential knowledge on health as a commons, has been named ‘health commons practices’. The focus on practices is not merely strategic (producing synergies and alliances), but inherently political (conceiving participation as a value) and connected to health and staying healthy (as individuals; as a community). The construct of ‘health commons practices’ is meant to make visible an area of ongoing transformations in new spaces created by movements and in more traditional actions in defence of existing public services, addressing health as a socio-political issue. In this essay, we sketch the reflection around six keywords that are central to it: commons, care, technology, efficacy, sustainability, institution

Vonoprazan for treatment of gastroesophageal reflux: pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic considerations

This review provides an update on the pharmacokinetic properties of vonoprazan and their correlates with pharmacodynamics; preliminary data on the therapeutic efficacy of vonoprazan as compared to lansoprazole in GERD patients Expert opinion: At variance from all available PPIs, vonoprazan acts directly on H+,K+-ATPase irrespectively of its activity, providing a fast onset of action without requiring acid activation and specific administration timing. Clinical and pharmacological investigations have confirmed a more rapid, potent and prolonged inhibition of acid secretion, including a better nighttime acid control, and a less antisecretory variability, as compared with PPIs. Preliminary data in patients with erosive esophagitis (EE) have shown the non-inferiority of vonoprazan to lansoprazole in terms of symptom relief and healing rate. Since these pharmacokinetic advantages, it is expected that it will have a significant favorable impact on GERD management. However, the clinical use of vonoprazan raises also some issues about its efficacy and safety in the long-term that deserve verification and careful investigation