7 research outputs found

    Discrimination, Reliability, Sensitivity, and Specificity of Robotic Surgical Proficiency Assessment With Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills and Binary Scoring Metrics: Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial

    Get PDF
    Objective: To compare binary metrics and Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills (GEARS) evaluations of training outcome assessments for reliability, sensitivity, and specificity. Background: GEARS–Likert-scale skills assessment are a widely accepted tool for robotic surgical training outcome evaluations. Proficiency-based progression (PBP) training is another methodology but uses binary performance metrics for evaluations. Methods: In a prospective, randomized, and blinded study, we compared conventional with PBP training for a robotic suturing, knot-tying anastomosis task. Thirty-six surgical residents from 16 Belgium residency programs were randomized. In the skills laboratory, the PBP group trained until they demonstrated a quantitatively defined proficiency benchmark. The conventional group were yoked to the same training time but without the proficiency requirement. The final trial was video recorded and assessed with binary metrics and GEARS by robotic surgeons blinded to individual, group, and residency program. Sensitivity and specificity of the two assessment methods were evaluated with area under the curve (AUC) and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves. Results: The PBP group made 42% fewer objectively assessed performance errors than the conventional group (P &lt; 0.001) and scored 15% better on the GEARS assessment (P = 0.033). The mean interrater reliability for binary metrics and GEARS was 0.87 and 0.38, respectively. Binary total error metrics AUC was 97% and for GEARS 85%. With a sensitivity threshold of 0.8, false positives rates were 3% and 25% for, respectively, the binary and GEARS assessments. Conclusions: Binary metrics for scoring a robotic VUA task demonstrated better psychometric properties than the GEARS assessment. </jats:sec

    Robot-assisted partial cystectomy with psoas hitch and ureterovesical reimplantation for a myofibroblastic pseudosarcomatous tumor of the bladder

    No full text
    We present the case of a 49-year-old patient who has a pseudosarcomatous inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor that reached the bladder to the level of the lower left urethra. We did a partial cystectomy by robot with ureteral reimplantation and psoas hitch. The patient has presented with an excellent post treatment evolution.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishe

    Measurement of the vasoconstrictive substances endothelin, angiotensin II, and thromboxane B2 in cold storage solution can reveal previous renal ischemic insults

    No full text
    In a rat model, the left kidney was subjected to 60 min of normothermic ischemia followed by 15 min of reperfusion, whereas the right kidney, serving as a paired control, was not rendered ischemic. Both kidneys were then perfused in situ with either Euro-Collins (EC) solution (n = 12) or University of Wisconsin (UW) solution (n = 6) for 10 min. Each kidney was then harvested and stored at 4 degrees C in its respective solution. After 24 and 48 h of cold storage, the following vasoactive substances were measured in the preservation media: endothelin (ET), angiotensin II (A-II), thromboxane (B2) (TxB2), and prostaglandin I2 (PGI2). After 24 h in EC solution, left kidneys uniformly produced significantly higher concentrations of each vasoactive substance than right kidneys: ET 1.64 +/- 0.3 pg/ml vs 0.82 +/- 0.1 pg/ml (P < or = 0.009); A-II 20.8 +/- 6.2 pg/ml vs 7.75 + 2.3 pg/ml (P < or = 0.007); TxB2 100.8 +/- 17.7 pg/ml vs 40.1 +/- 11.7 pg/ml (P < or = 0.04); PGI2 638.3 +/- 41.1 pg/ml vs 318.3 +/- 36.4 pg/ml (P < or = 0.001), respectively. At 48 h, a similar pattern of results was obtained as the kidney continued to produce TxB2 and prostacyclins during the 24-48 h period. In the UW solution, basal levels of ET and A-II were lower than those in EC solution, but similarly increased after initial ischemia.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS

    Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma: Results of a Belgian retrospective multicentre survey

    No full text
    Objectives: To evaluate the technical and oncologic feasibility of laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma. Methods: A retrospective survey of 100 patients, treated with laparoscopic nephroureterectomy in 10 Belgian centres, was performed. Most procedures were performed transperitoneally. The distal ureter was managed by open surgery in 55 patients and laparoscopically in 45 patients. The mean follow-up was 20 mo. Results: Mean operation time was 192 min and mean blood loss 234 ml. The conversion rate was 7%. Important postoperative complications were seen in 9%. Pathologic staging was pTa in 31 patients, pT1 in 23, pT2 in 12, pT3 in 33, and pT4 in 1, concomittant pTis in 3. Pathologic grade was G1 in 24 patients, G2 in 28, and G3 in 48. Negative surgical margins were obtained in all but one patient. Twenty-five patients developed progressive disease (24%) at a mean postoperative time of 9 mo (local recurrence in 8%, metastases in 11%, both in 5%). Progression was 0% for pTa, 17% for pT1, 17% for pT2, 51% for pT3, and 100% for pT4. Cancer-specific survival was 100% for pTa, 86% for pT1, 100% for pT2, 77% for pT3, and 0% for pT4. Conclusion: Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy appears to be a technically and oncologically feasible operation. To prevent tumour seeding, one should avoid opening the urinary tract and should extract the specimen with an intact organ bag. The high local recurrence rate in this study probably reflects the high percentage of high-grade and high-stage tumours in this study. (C) 2006 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved

    Discrimination, Reliability, Sensitivity, and Specificity of Robotic Surgical Proficiency Assessment With Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills and Binary Scoring Metrics: Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial

    No full text
    Objective:. To compare binary metrics and Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills (GEARS) evaluations of training outcome assessments for reliability, sensitivity, and specificity. Background:. GEARS–Likert-scale skills assessment are a widely accepted tool for robotic surgical training outcome evaluations. Proficiency-based progression (PBP) training is another methodology but uses binary performance metrics for evaluations. Methods:. In a prospective, randomized, and blinded study, we compared conventional with PBP training for a robotic suturing, knot-tying anastomosis task. Thirty-six surgical residents from 16 Belgium residency programs were randomized. In the skills laboratory, the PBP group trained until they demonstrated a quantitatively defined proficiency benchmark. The conventional group were yoked to the same training time but without the proficiency requirement. The final trial was video recorded and assessed with binary metrics and GEARS by robotic surgeons blinded to individual, group, and residency program. Sensitivity and specificity of the two assessment methods were evaluated with area under the curve (AUC) and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves. Results:. The PBP group made 42% fewer objectively assessed performance errors than the conventional group (P < 0.001) and scored 15% better on the GEARS assessment (P = 0.033). The mean interrater reliability for binary metrics and GEARS was 0.87 and 0.38, respectively. Binary total error metrics AUC was 97% and for GEARS 85%. With a sensitivity threshold of 0.8, false positives rates were 3% and 25% for, respectively, the binary and GEARS assessments. Conclusions:. Binary metrics for scoring a robotic VUA task demonstrated better psychometric properties than the GEARS assessment

    SN 2019ehk: A Double-peaked Ca-rich Transient with Luminous X-Ray Emission and Shock-ionized Spectral Features

    No full text
    corecore