11 research outputs found

    Compatibility and Stability of Morphine Sulphate and Naloxone Hydrochloride in 0.9% Sodium Chloride for Injection

    No full text
    ABSTRACTBackground: Naloxone may be administered in conjunction with morphine to reduce the risk of opioid-induced pruritis. Combining these drugs for coadministration may be beneficial, but little is known about their physical compatibility and stability in combined solutions.Objective: To describe the physical compatibility and stability of morphine sulphate and naloxone hydrochloride (at various concentrations) in IV admixtures.Methods:The physical compatibility and stability of admixtures of morphine 1000 ÎŒg/mL and naloxone 4 ÎŒg/mL, 12.5 ÎŒg/mL, and 25 ÎŒg/mL in 0.9% sodium chloride were studied. For each concentration of naloxone, one bag was stored at room temperature (22°C) for 72 h and one bag was stored under refrigeration (4°C) for 30 days. For all preparations, physical characteristics, including pH, colour, and formation of precipitate, were evaluated. The samples were also analyzed by a stability-indicating high-performance liquid chromatographic method. Stability was defined as the retention of at least 90% of the initial concentration.Results: No notable changes in pH or colour and no macroprecipitation were observed in any of the preparations after storage at 22°C for up to 72 h or at 4°C for up to 30 days. All preparations maintained more than 90% of the initial concentrations of morphine and naloxone at the end of the respective study periods. The calculated lower limit of the 95% confidence interval also indicated that 90% or more of the initial concentration remained at the end of each study period.Conclusion: Admixtures of morphine sulphate and naloxone hydrochloride were stable for 72 h at room temperature and for 30 days with refrigeration.RÉSUMÉContexte : La naloxone peut ĂȘtre administrĂ©e en concomitance avec la morphine pour rĂ©duire le risque de prurit induit par les opioĂŻdes. L’association de ces mĂ©dicaments pour leur administration concomitante peut ĂȘtre bĂ©nĂ©fique, mais on ne sait que peu de choses sur leur compatibilitĂ© physique et leur stabilitĂ© dans des solutions combinĂ©es.Objectif : DĂ©crire la compatibilitĂ© physique et la stabilitĂ© du sulfate de morphine et du chlorhydrate de naloxone (Ă  diverses concentrations) mĂ©langĂ©s dans des solutions pour administration i.v.MĂ©thodes : La compatibilitĂ© physique et la stabilitĂ© des mĂ©langes de morphine Ă  1000 ÎŒg/mL et de naloxone Ă  4 ÎŒg/mL, 12,5 ÎŒg/mL et 25 ÎŒg/mL dans du chlorure de sodium Ă  0,9 % ont Ă©tĂ© Ă©tudiĂ©es. Pour chaque concentration de naloxone, on a entreposĂ© un sac Ă  la tempĂ©rature ambiante (22 °C) pendant 72 heures et un autre au rĂ©frigĂ©rateur (4 °C) pendant 30 jours. Les propriĂ©tĂ©s physiques, notamment le pH, la couleur et la formation de prĂ©cipitĂ©, ont Ă©tĂ© Ă©valuĂ©es pour toutes les prĂ©parations. Les Ă©chantillons ont aussi Ă©tĂ© analysĂ©s Ă  l’aide d’une Ă©preuve validĂ©e mesurant la stabilitĂ© par chromatographie liquide haute performance. La stabilitĂ© a Ă©tĂ© dĂ©finie comme Ă©tant la rĂ©tention d’au moins 90 % de la concentration initiale des agents.RĂ©sultats : Aucun changement notable du pH ou de la couleur et aucune formation de macroprĂ©cipitĂ© n’ont Ă©tĂ© observĂ©s dans l’ensemble des prĂ©parations qui ont Ă©tĂ© conservĂ©es Ă  une tempĂ©rature de 22 °C pendant un maximum de 72 heures ou Ă  une tempĂ©rature de 4 °C pendant un maximum de 30 jours. Toutes les prĂ©parations ont conservĂ© plus de 90 % de leurs concentrations initiales de morphine et de naloxone Ă  la fin de leurs pĂ©riodes d’étude respectives. La limite infĂ©rieure de l’intervalle de confiance Ă  95 % indiquait Ă©galement que 90 % ou plus de la concentration initiale subsistait Ă  la fin de chaque pĂ©riode d’étude.Conclusion: Les mĂ©langes de sulfate de morphine et de chlorhydrate de naloxone sont demeurĂ©s stables pendant 72 heures Ă  la tempĂ©rature ambiante et pendant 30 jours lorsqu’ils Ă©taient rĂ©frigĂ©rĂ©s

    Promotion of self-regulated learning in classrooms:investigating frequency, quality, and consequences for student performance

    No full text
    An implication of the current research on self-regulation is to implement the promotion of self-regulated learning in schools. Teachers can promote self-regulated learning either directly by teaching learning strategies or indirectly by arranging a learning environment that enables students to practise self-regulation. This study investigates teachers' direct and indirect promotion of self-regulated learning and its relation to the development of students' performance. Twenty German mathematics teachers with their overall 538 students (grade 9) were videotaped for a three-lesson unit on the Pythagorean Theorem. Students' mathematics performance was tested several times before and after the observed lessons. A low-inferent coding system was applied to assess the teachers' implicit or explicit instruction of cognitive strategies (e.g., organisation), metacognitive strategies (e.g., planning), and motivational strategies (e.g., resource management). High-inferent ratings were used to assess features of the learning environment that foster self-regulation. Results reveal that a great amount of strategy teaching takes place in an implicit way, whereas explicit strategy teaching and supportive learning environment are rare. The instruction of organisation strategies and some features of the learning environment (constructivism, transfer) relate positively to students' performance development. In contrast to implicit strategy instruction, explicit strategy instruction was associated with a gain in performance. These results reveal a discrepancy between the usefulness of explicit strategy instruction and its rare occurrence in classrooms

    Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial of Speech after Early Neurostimulation in Parkinson's Disease

    No full text
    BackgroundThe EARLYSTIM trial demonstrated for Parkinson's disease patients with early motor complications that deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN-DBS) and best medical treatment (BMT) was superior to BMT alone. ObjectiveThis prospective, ancillary study on EARLYSTIM compared changes in blinded speech intelligibility assessment between STN-DBS and BMT over 2 years, and secondary outcomes included non-speech oral movements (maximum phonation time [MPT], oral diadochokinesis), physician- and patient-reported assessments. MethodsSTN-DBS (n = 102) and BMT (n = 99) groups underwent assessments on/off medication at baseline and 24 months (in four conditions: on/off medication, ON/OFF stimulation-for STN-DBS). Words and sentences were randomly presented to blinded listeners, and speech intelligibility rate was measured. Statistical analyses compared changes between the STN-DBS and BMT groups from baseline to 24 months. ResultsOver the 2-year period, changes in speech intelligibility and MPT, as well as patient-reported outcomes, were not different between groups, either off or on medication or OFF or ON stimulation, but most outcomes showed a nonsignificant trend toward worsening in both groups. Change in oral diadochokinesis was significantly different between STN-DBS and BMT groups, on medication and OFF STN-DBS, with patients in the STN-DBS group performing slightly worse than patients under BMT only. A signal for clinical worsening with STN-DBS was found for the individual speech item of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, Part III. ConclusionAt this early stage of the patients' disease, STN-DBS did not result in a consistent deterioration in blinded speech intelligibility assessment and patient-reported communication, as observed in studies of advanced Parkinson's Disease. (c) 2022 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society
    corecore