Perioperative Quality Initiative (POQI) consensus statement on the physiology of blood pressure control as applied to perioperative medicine.

Background: A multi-disciplinary, international working subgroup of the Third Perioperative Quality Initiative (POQI) consensus meeting reviewed the (patho)physiology and measurement of arterial blood pressure (ABP), as applied to perioperative medicine. Methods: We addressed predefined questions by undertaking a modified Delphi analysis, in which primary clinical research and review articles were identified using MEDLINE. Strength of recommendations, where applicable, were graded by NICE guidelines. Results: Perioperative ABP management is a physiologically-complex challenge influenced by multiple factors: (i) ABP is the input pressure to organ blood flow, but is not the sole determinant of perfusion pressure; (ii) blood flow is often independent of changes in perfusion pressure, due to autoregulatory changes in vascular resistance; (iii) microvascular dysfunction uncouples microvascular blood flow from ABP (haemodynamic incoherence) From a practical clinical perspective, we identified that: (i) ambulatory measurement is the optimal method to establish baseline ABP; (ii) automated and invasive ABP measurements have inherent physiological and technical limitations; (iii) individualised ABP targets may change over time, especially during the perioperative period. There remains a need for research in non-invasive, continuous arterial pressure measurements, macro- and microcirculatory control, regional perfusion pressure measurement and the development of sensitive, specific and continuous measures of cellular function to evaluate blood pressure management in a physiologically coherent manner. Conclusion: The multivariable, complex physiology contributing to dynamic changes in perioperative ABP may be underappreciated clinically. The frequently unrecognised dissociation between ABP, organ blood flow, microvascular and cellular function requires further research that develops a more refined, contextualized clinical approach to this routine measurement

The association between alcohol use, alcohol use disorders and tuberculosis (TB). A systematic review

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>In 2004, tuberculosis (TB) was responsible for 2.5% of global mortality (among men 3.1%; among women 1.8%) and 2.2% of global burden of disease (men 2.7%; women 1.7%). The present work portrays accumulated evidence on the association between alcohol consumption and TB with the aim to clarify the nature of the relationship.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A systematic review of existing scientific data on the association between alcohol consumption and TB, and on studies relevant for clarification of causality was undertaken.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>There is a strong association between heavy alcohol use/alcohol use disorders (AUD) and TB. A meta-analysis on the risk of TB for these factors yielded a pooled relative risk of 2.94 (95% CI: 1.89-4.59). Numerous studies show pathogenic impact of alcohol on the immune system causing susceptibility to TB among heavy drinkers. In addition, there are potential social pathways linking AUD and TB. Heavy alcohol use strongly influences both the incidence and the outcome of the disease and was found to be linked to altered pharmacokinetics of medicines used in treatment of TB, social marginalization and drift, higher rate of re-infection, higher rate of treatment defaults and development of drug-resistant forms of TB. Based on the available data, about 10% of the TB cases globally were estimated to be attributable to alcohol.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The epidemiological and other evidence presented indicates that heavy alcohol use/AUD constitute a risk factor for incidence and re-infection of TB. Consequences for prevention and clinical interventions are discussed.</p