3,977 research outputs found

    Evaluation of patient perceptions of team based care in a Geriatric Oncology Clinic

    Get PDF
    Purpose: To measure patient perceptions of collaborative practice in an interprofessional team providing geriatric oncology assessments to older patients with cancer. Background: The Senior Adult Oncology Clinic (SAOC) at Thomas Jefferson University’s Kimmel Cancer Center utilizes an interprofessional team approach to provide comprehensive geriatric oncology assessments and treatment plans for older patients with cancer. The importance of team-based healthcare delivery is well documented, however, experts agree that there is a need for more tools to assess the skills required to become a high-functioning team and a need to study the impact of collaborative practice on patient reported outcomes and satisfaction. For this study, we sought to evaluate patients’ experience and perception of our SAOC team function. Description of Intervention: Upon completion of a SAOC visit, patients were asked to participate in a short voluntary survey to assess team performance. The Jefferson Teamwork Observation Guide (JTOG) is a validated survey used with learners that has been adapted to elicit patient perspectives of five domains of interprofessional collaborative practice, including communication (C), values/ethics (V/E), teamwork (T), roles/responsibilities (R) and patient-centeredness (PC). The Patient JTOG includes eight competency–based Likert Scale questions as well as one open-ended question. The survey was administered on secure mobile tablets by trained research assistants (RAs) who were not part of the healthcare team. The study received exempt approval by our Institutional Review Board. Results: A total of 13 patients completed the survey. Seven respondents were female, and six were male. Seven identified as Caucasian, four as African American and two as other. One hundred percent responded “Strongly Agree” to a global question about the importance of teamwork in patient care (mean 4.0). Overall satisfaction with the SAOC team was 3.92 out of 4.0. For the eight questions relating to each of the five collaborative practice competencies noted above, the team received an average score ranging from 3.69 to 3.77 out of 4.0, for a global score of 29.66 (out of 32 possible), placing this team in the highest quartile of teams surveyed at our institution to date (n=407). In addition, all 13 respondents completed the open-ended qualitative comments with 12 out of the 13 being positive with multiple references to effective listening and communication, team coordination, and patient-centered care. Conclusion: The SAOC has a relatively unique model of providing interprofessional geriatric oncology assessments. The Patient JTOG tool was easy to incorporate into a busy clinic and provided valuable feedback to our providers, demonstrating that our patient’s perceive the team as highly functioning and effective. Based on these early results, our high functioning interprofessional consultative team model may serve as a model for replication for team based care delivery at other institutions Relevance: Incorporation of an easy to use tool to assess interprofessional team function and patient perceptions of collaborative practice Learning Objectives: Define methods for evaluating patient perceptions of collaborative practice in an outpatient geriatric oncology practice (Knowledge) Describe a replicable model for interprofessional collaborative practice (Comprehension/Application) Apply lessons learned for engaging students in and preparing faculty for interprofessional team-based care delivery (Comprehension/Application

    AOSpine—Spine Trauma Classification System: The Value of Modifiers: A Narrative Review With Commentary on Evolving Descriptive Principles

    Get PDF
    Study Design: Narrative review. Objectives: To describe the current AOSpine Trauma Classification system for spinal trauma and highlight the value of patient-specific modifiers for facilitating communication and nuances in treatment. Methods: The classification for spine trauma previously developed by The AOSpine Knowledge Forum is reviewed and the importance of case modifiers in this system is discussed. Results: A successful classification system facilitates communication and agreement between physicians while also determining injury severity and provides guidance on prognosis and treatment. As each injury may be unique among different patients, the importance of considering patient-specific characteristics is highlighted in this review. In the current AOSpine Trauma Classification, the spinal column is divided into 4 regions: the upper cervical spine (C0-C2), subaxial cervical spine (C3-C7), thoracolumbar spine (T1-L5), and the sacral spine (S1-S5, including coccyx). Each region is classified according to a hierarchical system with increasing levels of injury or instability and represents the morphology of the injury, neurologic status, and clinical modifiers. Specifically, these clinical modifiers are denoted starting with M followed by a number. They describe unique conditions that may change treatment approach such as the presence of significant soft tissue damage, uncertainty about posterior tension band injury, or the presence of a critical disc herniation in a cervical bilateral facet dislocation. These characteristics are described in detail for each spinal region. Conclusions: Patient-specific modifiers in the AOSpine Trauma Classification highlight unique clinical characteristics for each injury and facilitate communication and treatment between surgeons

    Experience with a Comprehensive Multidisciplinary Geriatric Oncology Center

    Get PDF
    Research Goals 1. Describe the population seen in the SAOC over the past 6 years Remediate and complete the EPIC flowsheets Merge data with existing RedCAP dat

    Opioid Consumption after Orthopedic Surgery: Prospective Randomized Trial on the Effects of Preoperative Counseling

    Get PDF
    Introduction: Recently, there have been increases in morbidity and mortality associated with opioid medications. Physician overprescribing, particularly within orthopedics, contributes to large quantities of leftover opioids, leading to an increased risk of non-medical opioid use and abuse. Objective: To understand the role of preoperative patient counseling on postoperative opioid consumption, a prospective randomized study was done, with the idea that patients receiving counseling would take fewer opioids than their control counterparts. Methods: Patients undergoing elective outpatient orthopedic surgery at Jefferson affiliate hospitals were enrolled over a 3-month period. Patients were randomized to a control group or to receive preoperative counseling in the form of a multimedia presentation aimed at educating the patient on opioid medications, strategies for pain management and the opioid epidemic. Information on demographics, surgical procedure, amount and type of opioid prescribed, number of opioids consumed and non-opioid analgesic use was collected at the first postoperative visit. Results: 283 patients were enrolled (57% women, 43% men). On average, patients who were counseled consumed 2.30 fewer opioids than their control counterparts (P=0.0497), equating to 34% of their entire prescription, compared to 42% in the control. Among patients who were counseled, 84.16% thought the preoperative multimedia presentation was helpful and 92.86% thought that all patients should watch the video before surgery. Discussion: There is evidence to suggest that preoperative opioid counseling is effective in decreasing postoperative opioid consumption. Leftover opioids totaled nearly 4,000 among all patients, indicating that orthopedic surgeons are prescribing far more than are being consumed

    Geographic Health Disparities in Kentucky: Starting a Conversation About Local Solutions

    Get PDF
    A recently released map of Kentucky demonstrates how life expectancy varies across the state’s 120 counties. The map vividly shows a decline in life expectancy as one travels east from the “Golden Triangle” in central urban Kentucky to the mountains of Appalachia. The lowest life expectancies are largely in the far southeastern portion of the state, where residents of the Central Highlands have confronted adverse social determinants of health for generations. Indeed, companion maps released by the Center on Society and Health, which plot median household income, poverty, and educational attainment at the census tract level, show the stark socioeconomic disadvantage in this distressed Appalachian region. The maps are intended as “conversation starters” to stimulate public discourse about the factors that shape health outcomes and to mobilize community concern and policy action to address health disparities in Appalachia. Meaningful change at the local level will be essential to transform the social and economic factors responsible for the region’s health

    Respiratory Rate Monitoring in Clinical Environments with a Contactless Ultra-Wideband Impulse Radar-based Sensor System

    Get PDF
    Respiratory rate is an extremely important but poorly monitored vital sign for medical conditions. Current modalities for respiratory monitoring are suboptimal. This paper presents a proof of concept of a new algorithm using a contactless ultra-wideband (UWB) impulse radar-based sensor to detect respiratory rate in both a laboratory setting and in a two-subject case study in the Emergency Department. This novel approach has shown correlation with manual respiratory rate in the laboratory setting and shows promise in Emergency Department subjects. In order to improve respiratory rate monitoring, the UWB technology is also able to localize subject movement throughout the room. This technology has potential for utilization both in and out of the hospital environments to improve monitoring and to prevent morbidity and mortality from a variety of medical conditions associated with changes in respiratory rate

    Emergent group level navigation: an agent-based evaluation of movement patterns in a folivorous primate.

    Get PDF
    The foraging activity of many organisms reveal strategic movement patterns, showing efficient use of spatially distributed resources. The underlying mechanisms behind these movement patterns, such as the use of spatial memory, are topics of considerable debate. To augment existing evidence of spatial memory use in primates, we generated movement patterns from simulated primate agents with simple sensory and behavioral capabilities. We developed agents representing various hypotheses of memory use, and compared the movement patterns of simulated groups to those of an observed group of red colobus monkeys (Procolobus rufomitratus), testing for: the effects of memory type (Euclidian or landmark based), amount of memory retention, and the effects of social rules in making foraging choices at the scale of the group (independent or leader led). Our results indicate that red colobus movement patterns fit best with simulated groups that have landmark based memory and a follow the leader foraging strategy. Comparisons between simulated agents revealed that social rules had the greatest impact on a group's step length, whereas the type of memory had the highest impact on a group's path tortuosity and cohesion. Using simulation studies as experimental trials to test theories of spatial memory use allows the development of insight into the behavioral mechanisms behind animal movement, developing case-specific results, as well as general results informing how changes to perception and behavior influence movement patterns
    corecore