9 research outputs found
Intraoperative heparinisation, blood loss and myocardial infarction during aortic aneurysm surgery: A joint vascular research group study
Objectives:The primary aim of this prospective multi-centre study involving patients undergoing elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) surgery was to investigate the relationship between intraoperative intravenous heparinisation, blood loss during surgery and thrombotic complications.Methods:Two hundred and eighty-four patients were randomised to receive intravenous heparin (n = 145) or no heparin (n = 139). Groups were evenly matched for age, sex, weight, aneurysm size, haemoglobin concentration, platelet counts and distal occlusive disease measured by ankle/brachial systolic pressure.Results:There were no statistically significant differences in blood loss (median 1400 ml vs. 1500 ml; z = 0.02, p = 0.98, 95% C.I. = −200 to 200), blood transfused (4.0 units vs. 4.0 units; z = 1.09, p=0.28, 95% C.I. = −1 to 0) or distal thrombosis between the two groups. However, analysis of the clinical outcome revealed that 5.7% of the non-heparin group but only 1.4% of the heparinised patients suffered a fatal perioperative myocardial infarction (MI); p < 0.05. All MI, including non fatal events, affected 8.5% and 2% respectively (p = 0.02).Conclusions:Heparin does not increase blood loss or the need for blood transfusion during surgery. Heparin is not necessary to prevent distal thrombosis when the aorta is cross clamped. The results of the study are consistent with the known mechanisms leading to intraoperative MI and strategies for its prevention. Intravenous heparin, given before aortic cross clamping, is an important prophylaxic against perioperative MI in relation to AAA surgery
Intraoperative heparinisation, blood loss and myocardial infarction during aortic aneurysm surgery: A joint vascular research group study
10-year stroke prevention after successful carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic stenosis (ACST-1); a multicentre randomised trial
BACKGROUND: If carotid artery narrowing remains asymptomatic (ie, has caused no recent stroke or other neurological symptoms), successful carotid endarterectomy (CEA) reduces stroke incidence for some years. We assessed the long-term effects of successful CEA. METHODS: Between 1993 and 2003, 3120 asymptomatic patients from 126 centres in 30 countries were allocated equally, by blinded minimised randomisation, to immediate CEA (median delay 1 month, IQR 0·3-2·5) or to indefinite deferral of any carotid procedure, and were followed up until death or for a median among survivors of 9 years (IQR 6-11). The primary outcomes were perioperative mortality and morbidity (death or stroke within 30 days) and non-perioperative stroke. Kaplan-Meier percentages and logrank p values are from intention-to-treat analyses. This study is registered, number ISRCTN26156392. FINDINGS: 1560 patients were allocated immediate CEA versus 1560 allocated deferral of any carotid procedure. The proportions operated on while still asymptomatic were 89·7% versus 4·8% at 1 year (and 92·1%vs 16·5% at 5 years). Perioperative risk of stroke or death within 30 days was 3·0% (95% CI 2·4-3·9; 26 non-disabling strokes plus 34 disabling or fatal perioperative events in 1979 CEAs). Excluding perioperative events and non-stroke mortality, stroke risks (immediate vs deferred CEA) were 4·1% versus 10·0% at 5 years (gain 5·9%, 95% CI 4·0-7·8) and 10·8% versus 16·9% at 10 years (gain 6·1%, 2·7-9·4); ratio of stroke incidence rates 0·54, 95% CI 0·43-0·68, p<0·0001. 62 versus 104 had a disabling or fatal stroke, and 37 versus 84 others had a non-disabling stroke. Combining perioperative events and strokes, net risks were 6·9% versus 10·9% at 5 years (gain 4·1%, 2·0-6·2) and 13·4% versus 17·9% at 10 years (gain 4·6%, 1·2-7·9). Medication was similar in both groups; throughout the study, most were on antithrombotic and antihypertensive therapy. Net benefits were significant both for those on lipid-lowering therapy and for those not, and both for men and for women up to 75 years of age at entry (although not for older patients). INTERPRETATION: Successful CEA for asymptomatic patients younger than 75 years of age reduces 10-year stroke risks. Half this reduction is in disabling or fatal strokes. Net benefit in future patients will depend on their risks from unoperated carotid lesions (which will be reduced by medication), on future surgical risks (which might differ from those in trials), and on whether life expectancy exceeds 10 years. FUNDING: UK Medical Research Council, BUPA Foundation, Stroke Association