57 research outputs found
Realismo Pragmático
In this paper I seek to articulate and develop Roberto Torretti’s advocacy of pragmatic realism. At the core of Torrietti’s view is a rejection of the notion that the truth of scientific theories consists in their correspondence to the world. I propose to understand correspondence in that sense as a metaphorical notion. I articulate a notion of pragmatist coherence, on the basis of which I make new coherence theories of truth and reality. Then it becomes possible to say that pragmatic realism consists in the pursuit of true knowledge of reality, in a way that is also consonant with Torretti’s pluralism.En este trabajo intento articular y desarrollar la defensa que Roberto Torretti hace del realismo pragmático. En el nĂşcleo de la visiĂłn de Torretti existe un rechazo a la idea de que la verdad de las teorĂas cientĂficas consista en su correspondencia con el mundo. Propongo entonces entender la correspondencia como una nociĂłn metafĂłrica. ArticularĂ© una nociĂłn de coherencia pragmática sobre la cual establezco una nueva teorĂa de la coherencia entre verdad y realidad. En consecuencia, resultará posible afirmar que el realismo pragmático consiste en la bĂşsqueda del verdadero conocimiento de la realidad, de un modo que tambiĂ©n concuerda con el pragamatismo defendido por Torretti
Recommended from our members
Pragmatism, Perspectivism and the Historicity of Science
The affinity between perspectivism and pragmatism is easily recognized if we take a humanist view on science, seeing it as a pursuit of knowledge that human agents engage in. As I interpret it, pragmatism is deep empiricism: a full realization of the idea that learning can only come from experience, understood not merely in terms of the propositional reports issuing from the “five senses”, but the full lived experience of purposeful agents in its ineliminable historical settings. The methods of science develop through the experience of scientific inquiry itself through its history. The inherent historicity of scientific knowledge also implies that the history and philosophy of science can only function well by mutual integration
Recommended from our members
Presentist History for Pluralist Science
Abstract: Building on my previous writings on presentism, pluralism, and “complementary science”, I develop an activist view of historiography. I begin by recognizing the inevitability of presentism. Our own purposes and perspectives do and should guide the production of our accounts of the past; like funerals, history-writing is for the living. There are different kinds of presentist history, depending on the historians’ purposes and perspectives. My particular inclination is pluralist. Science remembers its own history from a particular perspective (“whiggism”), which views the past as imperfect versions of the present; if professional historians of science shared this perspective, our work would be redundant. Instead, we can make it our task to illuminate the aspects of the past of science that scientists themselves tend to ignore and forget. History of science can also take a more productive role in the creation and improvement of scientific knowledge. Scientific progress as we know it tends to involve the shutting down of alternative paths of inquiry, resulting in a loss of potential and actual knowledge. A critical and sympathetic engagement with the past allows us to recover the lost paths, which can also suggest new paths. These points will be illustrated by a number of examples, especially from the history of chemistry and physics, including the recovery and extension of past experiments
Introduction: Systematicity, the Nature of Science?
Introduction to Synthese SI: Systematicity: The Nature of Science
Recommended from our members
Presentist History for Pluralist Science
Abstract: Building on my previous writings on presentism, pluralism, and “complementary science”, I develop an activist view of historiography. I begin by recognizing the inevitability of presentism. Our own purposes and perspectives do and should guide the production of our accounts of the past; like funerals, history-writing is for the living. There are different kinds of presentist history, depending on the historians’ purposes and perspectives. My particular inclination is pluralist. Science remembers its own history from a particular perspective (“whiggism”), which views the past as imperfect versions of the present; if professional historians of science shared this perspective, our work would be redundant. Instead, we can make it our task to illuminate the aspects of the past of science that scientists themselves tend to ignore and forget. History of science can also take a more productive role in the creation and improvement of scientific knowledge. Scientific progress as we know it tends to involve the shutting down of alternative paths of inquiry, resulting in a loss of potential and actual knowledge. A critical and sympathetic engagement with the past allows us to recover the lost paths, which can also suggest new paths. These points will be illustrated by a number of examples, especially from the history of chemistry and physics, including the recovery and extension of past experiments
Introduction: Systematicity, the Nature of Science?
Introduction to Synthese SI: Systematicity: The Nature of Science
- …