Expanding the clinical phenotype of patients with a ZDHHC9 mutation

In 2007, 250 families with X-linked intellectual disability (XLID) were screened for mutations in genes on the X-chromosome, and in 4 of these families, mutations in the ZDHHC9 gene were identified. The ID was either isolated or associated with a marfanoid habitus. ZDHHC9 encodes a palmitoyl transferase that catalyzes the posttranslational modification of NRAS and HRAS. Since this first description, no additional patient with a ZDHHC9 mutation has been reported in the literature. Here, we describe a large family in which we identified a novel pathogenic ZDHHC9 nonsense mutation (p.Arg298*) by parallel sequencing of all X-chromosome exons. The mutation cosegregated with the clinical phenotype in this family. An 18-year-old patient and his 40-year-old maternal uncle were evaluated. Clinical examination showed normal growth parameters, lingual fasciculation, limited extension of the elbows and metacarpophalangeal joints, and acrocyanosis. There was neither facial dysmorphism nor marfanoid habitus. Brain MRI detected a dysplastic corpus callosum. Neuropsychological testing showed mild intellectual disability. They both displayed generalized anxiety disorder, and the younger patient also suffered from significant behavior impairment that required attention or treatment. Speech evaluation detected satisfactory spoken language since both were able to provide information and to understand conversations of everyday life. Occupational therapy examination showed impaired visual-spatial and visual-motor performance with poor drawing/graphic skills. These manifestations are not specific enough to guide ZDHHC9 screening in patients with ID, and emphasize the value of next generation sequencing for making a molecular diagnosis and genetic counseling in families with XLID

Heterozygous deletion of the LRFN2 gene is associated with working memory deficits

International audienceLearning disabilities (LDs) are a clinically and genetically heterogeneous group of diseases. Array-CGH and high-throughput sequencing have dramatically expanded the number of genes implicated in isolated intellectual disabilities and LDs, highlighting the implication of neuron-specific post-mitotic transcription factors and synaptic proteins as candidate genes. We report a unique family diagnosed with autosomal dominant learning disability and a 6p21 microdeletion segregating in three patients. The 870 kb microdeletion encompassed the brain-expressed gene LRFN2, which encodes for a synaptic cell adhesion molecule. Neuropsychological assessment identified selective working memory deficits, with borderline intellectual functioning. Further investigations identified a defect in executive function, and auditory-verbal processes. These data were consistent with brain MRI and FDG-PET functional brain imaging, which, when compared with controls, revealed abnormal brain volume and hypometabolism of gray matter structures implicated in working memory. We performed electron microscopy immunogold labeling demonstrating the localization of LRFN2 at synapses of cerebellar and hippocampal rat neurons, often associated with the NR1 subunit of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDARs). Altogether, the combined approaches imply a role for LRFN2 in LD, specifically for working memory processes and executive function. In conclusion, the identification of familial cases of clinically homogeneous endophenotypes of LD might help in both the management of patients and genetic counseling for families