22 research outputs found

    Biokinetics and dosimetry of 111In-DOTA-NOC-ATE compared with 111In-DTPA-octreotide

    Get PDF
    Purpose: The biokinetics and dosimetry of 111In-DOTA-NOC-ATE (NOCATE), a high-affinity ligand of SSTR-2 and SSTR-5, and 111In-DTPA-octreotide (Octreoscan™, OCTREO) were compared in the same patients. Methods: Seventeen patients (10 men, 7 women; mean age 60years), referred for an OCTREO scan for imaging of a neuroendocrine tumour (15), thymoma (1) or medullary thyroid carcinoma (1), agreed to undergo a second study with NOCATE. Whole-body anterior-posterior scans were recorded 0.5 (100% reference scan), 4, 24 and 48h (17 patients) and 120h (5 patients) after injection. In 16 patients the OCTREO scan (178 ± 15MBq) was performed 16 ± 5days before the NOCATE scan (108 ± 14MBq) with identical timing; 1 patient had the NOCATE scan before the OCTREO scan. Blood samples were obtained from 14 patients 5min to 48h after injection. Activities expressed as percent of the initial (reference) activity in the whole body, lung, kidney, liver, spleen and blood were fitted to biexponential or single exponential functions. Dosimetry was performed using OLINDA/EXM. Results: Initial whole-body, lung and kidney activities were similar, but retention of NOCATE was higher than that of OCTREO. Liver and spleen uptakes of NOCATE were higher from the start (p < 0.001) and remained so over time. Whole-body activity showed similar α and β half-lives, but the β fraction of NOCATE was double that of OCTREO. Blood T 1/2β for NOCATE was longer (19 vs. 6h). As a result, the effective dose of NOCATE (105μSv/MBq) exceeded that of OCTREO (52μSv/MBq), and the latter result was similar to the ICRP 106 value of 54μSv/MBq. Differential activity measurement in blood cells and plasma showed an average of <5% of NOCATE and OCTREO attached to globular blood components. Conclusion: NOCATE showed a slower clearance from normal tissues and its effective dose was roughly double that of OCTRE

    EXPOSURE OF THE SWISS POPULATION BY RADIODIAGNOSTICS: 2013 REVIEW.

    Get PDF
    In 2013, a nationwide investigation was conducted in Switzerland to establish the population's exposure from medical X rays. A hybrid approach was used combining the Raddose database accessible on-line by the participating practices and the Swiss medical tariffication system for hospitals. This study revealed that the average annual number of examinations is 1.2 per inhabitant, and the associated annual effective dose is 1.4 mSv. It also showed that computed tomography is the most irradiating modality and that it delivers 70 % of the total dose. The annual effective dose per inhabitant registered a 17 % increase in 5 y and is comparable with what was recently reported in neighbouring countries

    Biokinetics and dosimetry of (111)In-DOTA-NOC-ATE compared with (111)In-DTPA-octreotide.

    Get PDF
    PURPOSE: The biokinetics and dosimetry of (111)In-DOTA-NOC-ATE (NOCATE), a high-affinity ligand of SSTR-2 and SSTR-5, and (111)In-DTPA-octreotide (Octreoscan?, OCTREO) were compared in the same patients. METHODS: Seventeen patients (10 men, 7 women; mean age 60 years), referred for an OCTREO scan for imaging of a neuroendocrine tumour (15), thymoma (1) or medullary thyroid carcinoma (1), agreed to undergo a second study with NOCATE. Whole-body anterior-posterior scans were recorded 0.5 (100 % reference scan), 4, 24 and 48 h (17 patients) and 120 h (5 patients) after injection. In 16 patients the OCTREO scan (178 ± 15 MBq) was performed 16 ± 5 days before the NOCATE scan (108 ± 14 MBq) with identical timing; 1 patient had the NOCATE scan before the OCTREO scan. Blood samples were obtained from 14 patients 5 min to 48 h after injection. Activities expressed as percent of the initial (reference) activity in the whole body, lung, kidney, liver, spleen and blood were fitted to biexponential or single exponential functions. Dosimetry was performed using OLINDA/EXM. RESULTS: Initial whole-body, lung and kidney activities were similar, but retention of NOCATE was higher than that of OCTREO. Liver and spleen uptakes of NOCATE were higher from the start (p &lt; 0.001) and remained so over time. Whole-body activity showed similar α and β half-lives, but the β fraction of NOCATE was double that of OCTREO. Blood T (1/2)β for NOCATE was longer (19 vs. 6 h). As a result, the effective dose of NOCATE (105 μSv/MBq) exceeded that of OCTREO (52 μSv/MBq), and the latter result was similar to the ICRP 106 value of 54 μSv/MBq. Differential activity measurement in blood cells and plasma showed an average of &lt;5 % of NOCATE and OCTREO attached to globular blood components. CONCLUSION: NOCATE showed a slower clearance from normal tissues and its effective dose was roughly double that of OCTREO

    Analyse d'un corpus d'articles de traitement numérique du signal (TNS : domaine de la physique appliquée aux systèmes de télécommunications) en vue de modélisation linguistique et d'application NTICE (thèse...)

    No full text
    Partant du constat que le traitement divergent d'unités lexicales dans divers dictionnaires révèle des carences de l'analyse linguistique ; un corpus d'article de Traitement Numérique du Signal (domaine de la physique appliquée aux systèmes de télécommunications) sert de support à une analyse linguistique appliquée à une série échantillon, en vue de modélisation. La série lexicale choisie est (USE : reuse, reused, reusing, usage, use, used, useful, usefulness, useless, users, uses, using, usual, usually), constituée d'éléments du dictionnaire de niveaux divers. Les mécanismes prédicatifs sont présentés au sein des segments traditionnellement définis : groupe, syntagme et proposition. Les formes prédicatives "de base" et les "participes de présent ou de passé" (notées V0, V1 et V2) constituent un point d'ancrage de cette étude ; il s'agit de voir leur organisation par catégories et leur distribution fonctionnelle, ainsi que leurs liens paraphrastiques à travers des manipulations à prédication et énonciation constantes. Les résultats obtenus permettent une évaluation des distinctions usuelles.NICE-BU Lettres Arts Sci.Hum. (060882104) / SudocSudocFranceF

    A scoping review of interpretability and explainability concerning artificial intelligence methods in medical imaging

    No full text
    Purpose: to review eXplainable Artificial Intelligence/(XAI) methods available for medical imaging/(MI). Method: a scoping review was conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute's methodology. The search was performed on Pubmed, Embase, Cinhal, Web of Science, BioRxiv, MedRxiv, and Google Scholar. Studies published in French and English after 2017 were included. Keyword combinations and descriptors related to explainability, and MI modalities were employed. Two independent reviewers screened abstracts, titles and full text, resolving differences through discussion. Results: 228 studies met the criteria. XAI publications are increasing, targeting MRI (n = 73), radiography (n = 47), CT (n = 46). Lung (n = 82) and brain (n = 74) pathologies, Covid-19 (n = 48), Alzheimer's disease (n = 25), brain tumors (n = 15) are the main pathologies explained. Explanations are presented visually (n = 186), numerically (n = 67), rule-based (n = 11), textually (n = 11), and example-based (n = 6). Commonly explained tasks include classification (n = 89), prediction (n = 47), diagnosis (n = 39), detection (n = 29), segmentation (n = 13), and image quality improvement (n = 6). The most frequently provided explanations were local (78.1 %), 5.7 % were global, and 16.2 % combined both local and global approaches. Post-hoc approaches were predominantly employed. The used terminology varied, sometimes indistinctively using explainable (n = 207), interpretable (n = 187), understandable (n = 112), transparent (n = 61), reliable (n = 31), and intelligible (n = 3). Conclusion: the number of XAI publications in medical imaging is increasing, primarily focusing on applying XAI techniques to MRI, CT, and radiography for classifying and predicting lung and brain pathologies. Visual and numerical output formats are predominantly used. Terminology standardisation remains a challenge, as terms like “explainable” and “interpretable” are sometimes being used indistinctively. Future XAI development should consider user needs and perspectives
    corecore