Perfluoroalkyl Substances and Fish Consumption in the Great Lakes Fish Consumer Study

A major source of exposure to perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) is thought to be consumption of seafood from contaminated waters. We assessed associations of serum PFAS levels with fish meals in a cohort of frequent and infrequent Great Lakes (GL) sport fish consumers. Participants reported number of fish meals eaten in the past year caught from a GL and those purchased commercially. Eleven PFASs were measured in 473 stored serum samples. Log-transformed PFAS were regressed on fish meals, adjusting for age, BMI, sex, and education. Mean age was 57.9 years and BMI was 29.6 kg/m2; 70% male; 70% completed at least some college. Median GL sport fish was 10 (IQR=0, 30) and commercial fish was 15 (IQR=4, 52) meals/year. Increases of 5 GL sport fish meals/year was significantly (p<0.05) associated with increases in serum levels of several PFASs: PFUnDA (4.1%), PFDA (3.8%), n-PFOS (3.7%), PFNA (2.7%), PFHpS and sm-PFOS (1.5%), PFHxS and MeFOSAA (1%). Increases in serum PFAS levels for an increase of 5 purchased fish meals/year were smaller (range 0.6%-1.0%). Significant increases in serum concentrations of several PFAS were seen for both GL and commercial fish meals with larger increases for GL than commercial fish meals.Ope

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated by posterior spinal segmental instrumented fusion : When is fusion to L3 stable?

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors for distal adding on (AO) or distal junctional kyphosis (DJK) in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) treated by posterior spinal fusion (PSF) to L3 with a minimum 2-year follow-up. METHODS: AIS patients undergoing PSF to L3 by two senior surgeons from 2000–2010 were analyzed. Distal AO and DJK were deemed poor radiographic results and defined as >3 cm of deviation from L3 to the center sacral vertical line (CSVL), or >10° angle at L3–4 on the posterior anterior- or lateral X-ray at ultimate follow-up. New stable vertebra (SV) and neutral vertebra (NV) scores were defined for this study. The total stability (TS) score was the sum of the SV and NV scores. RESULTS: Ten of 76 patients (13.1%) were included in the poor radiographic outcome group. The other 66 patients were included in the good radiographic outcome group. Lower Risser grade, more SV-3 (CSVL doesn’t touch the lowest instrumented vertebra [LIV]) on standing and side bending films, lesser NV and TS score, rigid L3–4 disc, more rotation and deviation of L3 were identified risk factors for AO or DJK. Age, number of fused vertebrae, curve correction, preoperative coronal/sagittal L3–4 disc angle did not differ significantly between the two groups. Multiple logistic regression results indicated that preoperative Risser grade 0, 1 (odds ratio [OR], 1.8), SV-3 at L3 in standing and side benders (OR, 2.1 and 2.8, respectively), TS score -5, -6 at L3 (OR, 4.4), rigid disc at L3–4 (OR, 3.1), LIV rotation >15° (OR, 2.9), and LIV deviation >2 cm from CSVL (OR, 2.2) were independent predictive factors. Although there was significant improvement of the of Scoliosis Research Society-22 average scores only in the good radiographic outcome group, there was no significant difference in the scores between the groups. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of AO or DJK at ultimate follow-up for AIS with LIV at L3 was 13.1%. To prevent AO or DJK following fusion to L3, we recommend that the CSVL touch L3 in both standing and side bending, TS score is -4 or less, the L3/4 disc is flexible, L3 is neutral (<15°) and ≤2 cm from the midline and the patient is ≥ Risser 2

The incidence of adding-on or distal junctional kyphosis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated by anterior spinal fusion to L3 was significantly higher than by posterior spinal fusion to L3

OBJECTIVE: To compare and identify risk factors for distal adding-on (AO) or distal junctional kyphosis (DJK) in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) treated by anterior- (ASF) and posterior spinal fusion (PSF) to L3. METHODS: AIS patients undergoing ASF versus PSF to L3 from 2000-2010 were analyzed. Distal AO and DJK were deemed poor radiographic results. New stable (SV) and neutral vertebra (NV) scores were defined for this study. The total stability (TS) score was the sum of the SV and NV scores. RESULTS: Twenty of 42 (ASF group: 47.6%) and 8 of 72 patients (PSF group: 11.1%) showed poor radiographic outcome. Fused vertebrae, correction rate of main curve, coronal reduction rate of L3 were significantly higher in PSF group. Multiple logistic regression results indicated that preoperative SV-3 at L3 in standing and side benders (odds ratio [OR], 2.7 and 3.7, respectively), TS score -5, -6 at L3 (OR, 4.9), rigid disc at L3-4 (OR, 3.7), lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) rotation \u3e 15° (OR, 3.3), LIV deviation \u3e 2 cm from center sacral vertical line (OR, 3.1) and ASF (OR, 13.4; p \u3c 0.001) were independent predictive factors. There was significant improvement of the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22 average scores only in PSF group. Furthermore, the ultimate scores of PSF group were significantly superior to ASF group. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of AO or DJK at ultimate follow-up for AIS with LIV at L3 was significantly higher in ASF group. Ultimate SRS-22 scores were significantly better in PSF group

Patient-Reported Outcomes After Complex Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: 5-Year Results of the Scoli-Risk-1 Study

Adult spinal deformity; Patient reported outcomes; Spinal deformity surgeryDeformidad espinal en el adulto; Resultados informados por el paciente; Cirugía de deformidad espinalDeformitat espinal de l'adult; Resultats informats pel pacient; Cirurgia de deformitat espinalStudy Design: Prospective cohort. Objective: To prospectively evaluate PROs up to 5-years after complex ASD surgery. Methods: The Scoli-RISK-1 study enrolled 272 ASD patients undergoing surgery from 15 centers. Inclusion criteria was Cobb angle of >80°, corrective osteotomy for congenital or revision deformity, and/or 3-column osteotomy. The following PROs were measured prospectively at intervals up to 5-years postoperative: ODI, SF36-PCS/MCS, SRS-22, NRS back/leg. Among patients with 5-year follow-up, comparisons were made from both baseline and 2-years postoperative to 5-years postoperative. PROs were analyzed using mixed models for repeated measures. Results: Seventy-seven patients (28.3%) had 5-year follow-up data. Comparing baseline to 5-year data among these 77 patients, significant improvement was seen in all PROs: ODI (45.2 vs. 29.3, P 0.05) and proportion achieving MCID did not differ significantly in patients with major surgery-related complications compared to those without. Conclusions: After complex ASD surgery, significant improvement in PROs were seen at 5-years postoperative in ODI, SF36-PCS/MCS, SRS-22r, and NRS-back/leg pain. No significant changes in PROs occurred during the 2 to 5-year postoperative period. Those with major surgery-related complications had similar PROs and proportion of patients achieving MCID as those without these complications.The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This study was funded by AO Spine through the AO Spine Knowledge Forum Deformity, the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS), and Norton Healthcare. AO Spine Knowledge Forum Deformity is a focused group of international deformity experts. AO Spine is a clinical division of the AO Foundation, which is an independent medically-guided not-for-profit organization. Study support was provided directly through the AO Spine Research Department and the AO Innovation Translation Center, Clinical Evidence

Selecting the touched vertebra as the lowest instrumented vertebra in patients with Lenke type-1 and 2 curves: Radiographic results after a minimum 5-year follow-up

BACKGROUND: The selection of the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is still controversial. Although multiple radiographic methods have been proposed, there is no universally accepted guideline for appropriate selection of the LIV. We developed a simple and reproducible method for selection of the LIV in patients with Lenke type-1 (main thoracic) and 2 (double thoracic) curves and investigated its effectiveness in producing optimal positioning of the LIV at 5 years of follow-up. METHODS: The radiographs for 299 patients with Lenke type-1 or 2 AIS curves that were included in a multicenter database were evaluated after a minimum duration of follow-up of 5 years. The touched vertebra (TV) was selected on preoperative radiographs by 2 independent examiners. The LIV on postoperative radiographs was compared with the preoperative TV. The final LIV position in relation to the center sacral vertical line (CSVL) was assessed. The CSVL-LIV distance and coronal balance in patients who had fusion to the TV were compared with those in patients who had fusion cephalad and caudad to the TV. The sagittal plane was also reviewed. RESULTS: In 86.6% of patients, the LIV was selected at or immediately adjacent to the TV. Among patients with an A lumbar modifier, those who had fusion cephalad to the TV had a significantly greater CSVL-LIV distance than those who had fusion to the TV (p = 0.006) or caudad to the TV (p = 0.002). In the groups with B (p = 0.424) and C (p = 0.326) lumbar modifiers, there were no differences among the TV groups. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend the TV rule as a third modifier in the Lenke AIS classification system. Selecting the TV as the LIV in patients with Lenke type-1 and 2 curves provides acceptable positioning of the LIV at long-term follow-up. The position of the LIV was not different when fusion was performed caudad to the TV but came at the expense of fewer motion segments. Patients with lumbar modifier A who had fusion cephalad to the TV had greater translation of the LIV, putting these patients at risk for poor long-term outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence

Cervical Inclination Angle: Normative Values in an Adult Multiethnic Asymptomatic Population

Objective The role of the craniocervical complex in spinal sagittal alignment has rarely been analyzed but it may play a fundamental role in postoperative mechanical complications. The aim of the study is to analyze the normative value of the cervical inclination angle (CIA) in an adult asymptomatic multiethnic population. Methods Standing full-spine EOS of adult asymptomatic volunteers from 5 different countries were analyzed. The CIA was analyzed globally and then in each decade of life. Different ethnicities were compared. Comparisons between different groups was performed using a t-test and statistical significance was considered with a p-value < 0.05. Results EOS of 468 volunteers were analyzed. The global mean CIA was 80.2° with a maximum difference of 9° between T1 and T12 (p < 0.001). The CIA remains constant until 60 years old then decreases significantly passing from a mean value before 20 years old of 82.25° to 73.65° after 70 years old. A statistically significant difference was found between the Arabics and other ethnicities with the formers having an inferior CIA: this was related to a mean older age (p < 0.05) and higher body mass index (p < 0.05) in the Arabics. Conclusion The CIA remains constant until 60 years old and then reduces slightly but never under 70°. This angle is helpful to evaluate the lever arm at the upper instrumented vertebra after an adult spinal deformity surgery and could predict the occurrence of a proximal junctional kyphosis when its value is lower than normal. Further clinical studies must confirm this theory

Reverse posterior column osteotomy (rPCO) for fixed thoracolumbar hyperlordosis correction: Technique and case report

Study design: Case report. Objectives: There is limited literature describing rigid thoracolumbar hyperlordosis correction. This case will highlight the reverse posterior column osteotomy (rPCO) technique to correct rigid thorcolumbar hyperlordosis, which is rarely described in literature. Summary of background data: Rigid thorcolumbar hyperlordosis is an infrequently encountered pathology. There is a paucity of surgical approach described in literature to correct this deformity. Methods: A 21-year-old female patient with a history of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis presented with cervicothoracic proximal junctional kyphosis and a fixed thorcolumbar hyperlordosis after two previous spine surgeries with the final construct fusing from T3-L4. Results: Patient underwent deformity correction involving T3 vertebral column resection and rPCO’s at T12-L3 to correction regional and global sagittal malalignment. Conclusions: The rPCO technique can reliably correct fixed thorcolumbar hyperlordosis

Neurologic Deficit During Halo-Gravity Traction in the Treatment of Severe Thoracic Kyphoscoliotic Spinal Deformity.

Correction of severe spinal deformity is a significant challenge for spinal surgeons. Although halo-gravity traction (HGT) has been shown to be well-tolerated and safe, we report here a case of neurologic decline during treatment. A 24-year-old male presents with severe thoracic kyphoscoliosis with &gt; 180° of 3-dimensional deformity. Magnetic resonance imaging showed his thoracic spinal cord draped across his T7-9 apex. His neurologic exam showed lower extremity myelopathy. During week 7 at a goal traction weight of 18.1 kg, his distal lower extremity exam declined from 4+/5 to 2/5. His traction weight was lowered to 11.3 kg. He subsequently sustained a ground-level fall and became paraparetic with a motor exam of 1-2/5. He subsequently underwent a T1-L4 posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion with a T7-9 vertebral column resection. Postoperatively, he was noted to have a complete return to his baseline neurologic exam. At his 4-month postoperative visit, he was now full strength in his lower extremities with complete resolution of his myelopathy. We present here a case of neurologic decline in a patient with severe kyphoscoliosis who underwent HGT and discuss the management decisions associated with this challenging scenario

Dual S2 Alar-Iliac Screw Technique With a Multirod Construct Across the Lumbosacral Junction: Obtaining Adequate Stability at the Lumbosacral Junction in Spinal Deformity Surgery

To illustrate the safe placement of a 5-screw/5-rod construct across the spinopelvic junction in a complex revision case utilizing 4 S2 alar-iliac (S2AI) screws as well as an iliac screw for a kickstand rod. The S2AI screws are often used for lumbosacral fixation at the base of long spinal deformity constructs. In severe spinal deformities, additional pelvic fixation beyond the standard 2 screws may help achieve and maintain correction, and also increase the rigidity of the construct. With a thorough understanding of pelvic anatomy, multiple pelvic screws, such as bilateral dual S2AI screws, may be placed safely to achieve stability and accommodate additional rods to perform powerful correction techniques. We illustrate the safe use of multiple rods across the lumbosacral junction in this case, by using both a hook rod construct and domino connectors – ultimately though these additional rods rely on the integrity of the pelvic fixation to provide their support. We recommend at least 3 rods across the lumbosacral junction in any adult spinal deformity case requiring pelvic fixation, and would recommend considering more than 3 rods, especially across 3-column osteotomy sites. For long spinal constructs in patients with significant adult spinal deformity, we believe the use of multiple pelvic screws to a multirod construct is a safe and effective way to provide long-term correction and clinical success

Evaluation of 3D vertebral and pelvic position by surface topography in asymptomatic females: presentation of normative reference data

Background!#!Deviations from a conventional physiologic posture are often a cause of complaint. According to current literature, the upright physiological spine posture exhibits inclinations in the sagittal plane but not in the coronal and transverse planes, but individual vertebral body positions of asymptomatic adults have rarely been described using surface topography. Therefore, this work aims to form a normative reference dataset for the thoracic and lumbar vertebral bodies and for the pelvis in all three planes in asymptomatic women.!##!Methods!#!In a prospective, cross-sectional, monocentric study, 100 pain-free asymptomatic women, aged 20-64 years were enrolled. Habitual standing positions of the trunk were measured using surface topography. Data were analyzed in all three planes. Age sub-analysis was: 1) ages ≤ 40 years and 2) ages ≥ 41 years. Two-sample t-tests were used for age comparisons of the vertebral bodies, vertebra prominence (VP)-L4, and global parameters. One-sample t-tests were used to test deviations from symmetrical zero positions of VP-L4.!##!Results!#!Coronal plane: on average, the vertebral bodies were tilted to the right between the VP and T4 (maximum: T2 - 1.8° ± 3.2), while between T6 and T11 they were tilted to the left (maximum: T7 1.1° ± 1.9). T5 and L2 were in a neutral position, overall depicting a mean right-sided lateral flexion from T2 to T7 (apex at T5). Sagittal plane: the kyphotic apex resided at T8 with - 0.5° ± 3.6 and the lumbar lordotic apex at L3 with - 2.1° ± 7.4. Transverse plane: participants had a mean vertebral body rotation to the right ranging from T6 to L4 (maximum: T11 - 2.2° ± 3.5). Age-specific differences were seen in the sagittal plane and had little effect on overall posture.!##!Conclusions!#!Asymptomatic female volunteers standing in a habitual posture displayed an average vertebral rotation and lateral flexion to the right in vertebral segments T2-T7. The physiological asymmetrical posture of women could be considered in spinal therapies. With regard to spinal surgery, it should be clarified whether an approximation to an absolutely symmetrical posture is desirable from a biomechanical point of view? This data set can also be used as a reference in clinical practice.!##!Trial registration!#!This study was registered with WHO (INT: DRKS00010834) and approved by the responsible ethics committee at the Rhineland-Palatinate Medical Association (837.194.16)