Prescribed hypocaloric nutrition support for critically-ill adults

Background There are controversies about the amount of calories and the type of nutritional support that should be given to critically‐ill people. Several authors advocate the potential benefits of hypocaloric nutrition support, but the evidence is inconclusive. Objectives To assess the effects of prescribed hypocaloric nutrition support in comparison with standard nutrition support for critically‐ill adults Search methods We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, Embase and LILACS (from inception to 20 June 2017) with a specific strategy for each database. We also assessed three websites, conference proceedings and reference lists, and contacted leaders in the field and the pharmaceutical industry for undetected/unpublished studies. There was no restriction by date, language or publication status. Selection criteria We included randomized and quasi‐randomized controlled trials comparing hypocaloric nutrition support to normo‐ or hypercaloric nutrition support or no nutrition support (e.g. fasting) in adults hospitalized in intensive care units (ICUs). Data collection and analysis We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. We meta‐analysed data for comparisons in which clinical heterogeneity was low. We conducted prespecified subgroup and sensitivity analyses, and post hoc analyses, including meta‐regression. Our primary outcomes were: mortality (death occurred during the ICU and hospital stay, or 28‐ to 30‐day all‐cause mortality); length of stay (days stayed in the ICU and in the hospital); and Infectious complications. Secondary outcomes included: length of mechanical ventilation. We assessed the quality of evidence with GRADE. Main results We identified 15 trials, with a total of 3129 ICU participants from university‐associated hospitals in the USA, Colombia, Saudi Arabia, Canada, Greece, Germany and Iran. There are two ongoing studies. Participants suffered from medical and surgical conditions, with a variety of inclusion criteria. Four studies used parenteral nutrition and nine studies used only enteral nutrition; it was unclear whether the remaining two used parenteral nutrition. Most of them could not achieve the proposed caloric targets, resulting in small differences in the administered calories between intervention and control groups. Most studies were funded by the US government or non‐governmental associations, but three studies received funding from industry. Five studies did not specify their funding sources. The included studies suffered from important clinical and statistical heterogeneity. This heterogeneity did not allow us to report pooled estimates of the primary and secondary outcomes, so we have described them narratively. When comparing hypocaloric nutrition support with a control nutrition support, for hospital mortality (9 studies, 1775 participants), the risk ratios ranged from 0.23 to 5.54; for ICU mortality (4 studies, 1291 participants) the risk ratios ranged from 0.81 to 5.54, and for mortality at 30 days (7 studies, 2611 participants) the risk ratios ranged from 0.79 to 3.00. Most of these estimates included the null value. The quality of the evidence was very low due to unclear or high risk of bias, inconsistency and imprecision. Participants who received hypocaloric nutrition support compared to control nutrition support had a range of mean hospital lengths of stay of 15.70 days lower to 10.70 days higher (10 studies, 1677 participants), a range of mean ICU lengths of stay 11.00 days lower to 5.40 days higher (11 studies, 2942 participants) and a range of mean lengths of mechanical ventilation of 13.20 days lower to 8.36 days higher (12 studies, 3000 participants). The quality of the evidence for this outcome was very low due to unclear or high risk of bias in most studies, inconsistency and imprecision. The risk ratios for infectious complications (10 studies, 2804 participants) of each individual study ranged from 0.54 to 2.54. The quality of the evidence for this outcome was very low due to unclear or high risk of bias, inconsistency and imprecision We were not able to explain the causes of the observed heterogeneity using subgroup and sensitivity analyses or meta‐regression. Authors' conclusions The included studies had substantial clinical heterogeneity. We found very low‐quality evidence about the effects of prescribed hypocaloric nutrition support on mortality in hospital, in the ICU and at 30 days, as well as in length of hospital and ICU stay, infectious complications and the length of mechanical ventilation. For these outcomes there is uncertainty about the effects of prescribed hypocaloric nutrition, since the range of estimates includes both appreciable benefits and harms. Given these limitations, results must be interpreted with caution in the clinical field, considering the unclear balance of the risks and harms of this intervention. Future research addressing the clinical heterogeneity of participants and interventions, study limitations and sample size could clarify the effects of this intervention.Fil: Perman, Mario I. Hospital Italiano; ArgentinaFil: Ciapponi, Agustín. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Franco, Juan V.A.. Hospital Italiano; ArgentinaFil: Loudet, Cecilia. Universidad Nacional de La Plata; ArgentinaFil: Crivelli, Adriana. Hospital HIGA San Martín; ArgentinaFil: Garrote, Virginia. Hospital Italiano; ArgentinaFil: Perman, Gastón. Hospital Italiano; Argentin

Evidencia orientada al problema: beta-bloqueantes y deterioro de la función pulmonar en pacientes con enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica y cardiopatía isquémica

Objetivo del trabajo: analizar a través de la EOP la relación entre betabloqueantes y el deterioro de la función pulmonar en pacientes EPOC.Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Muse

Seguridad del paracetamol en pacientes bajo tratamiento con anticoagulantes orales

El manejo del dolor en pacientes que requieren anticoagulantes orales (ACO) en forma crónica resulta ser un desafío por la interacción con el uso de concomitante de AINES y ACO, por aumento del riesgo de sangrados y de la morbimortalidad de estos pacientes. El paracetamol se presenta como una opción alternativa por menor probabilidad de sangrados, aunque su seguridad no ha sido definitivamente establecida. Presentamos una paciente de 65 años de edad con fibrilación auricular y tratamiento con warfarina. Comenzó con cuadro de dolor articular por artrosis por lo cual se le indica paracetamol para el manejo analgésico. En controles subsiguientes del "ratio internacional normalizado" (RIN) presenta valores por encima de los recomendados para el rango de anticoagulación, por lo cual surge la siguiente pregunta de investigación: ¿En pacientes tratados en forma crónica con ACO y con requerimiento de analgésicos (población), el uso de paracetamol (intervención) comparado con placebo (comparación) aumenta el riesgo de sangrado mayor o sangrado global (variable de resultado)?Facultad de Ciencias Médica

Seguridad del paracetamol en pacientes bajo tratamiento con anticoagulantes orales

El manejo del dolor en pacientes que requieren anticoagulantes orales (ACO) en forma crónica resulta ser un desafío por la interacción con el uso de concomitante de AINES y ACO, por aumento del riesgo de sangrados y de la morbimortalidad de estos pacientes. El paracetamol se presenta como una opción alternativa por menor probabilidad de sangrados, aunque su seguridad no ha sido definitivamente establecida. Presentamos una paciente de 65 años de edad con fibrilación auricular y tratamiento con warfarina. Comenzó con cuadro de dolor articular por artrosis por lo cual se le indica paracetamol para el manejo analgésico. En controles subsiguientes del "ratio internacional normalizado" (RIN) presenta valores por encima de los recomendados para el rango de anticoagulación, por lo cual surge la siguiente pregunta de investigación: ¿En pacientes tratados en forma crónica con ACO y con requerimiento de analgésicos (población), el uso de paracetamol (intervención) comparado con placebo (comparación) aumenta el riesgo de sangrado mayor o sangrado global (variable de resultado)?Facultad de Ciencias Médica

Eficacia y seguridad de inhibidores de bomba de protones versus antagonistas de receptores H2 para profilaxis de úlceras por estrés en pacientes críticos

Objetivo principal: analizar la eficacia de IBP versus Antih2 para profilaxis de hemorragia digestiva en pacientes críticos.Facultad de Ciencias Médica

Eficacia y seguridad de inhibidores de bomba de protones versus antagonistas de receptores H2 para profilaxis de úlceras por estrés en pacientes críticos

Objetivo principal: analizar la eficacia de IBP versus Antih2 para profilaxis de hemorragia digestiva en pacientes críticos.Facultad de Ciencias Médica

Evidencia orientada al problema: tratamiento farmacológico del delirio hiperactivo en terapia intensiva

Los pacientes admitidos a unidades de cuidados intensivos (UCI), presentan alta incidencia de delirio, con consecuencias severas como mayor mortalidad y alteraciones cognitivas. Hasta el momento no se ha establecido una terapéutica farmacológica efectiva. La dexmedetomedina (DXM) es un tratamiento atractivo particularmente para el delirio hiperactivo debido a que produce sedación sin generar depresión respiratoria. La evidencia orientada al problema (EOP) tiene como propósito realizar una revisión crítica de la literatura para dar respuesta a una pregunta que surge de un problema clínico real. Objetivo: analizar la eficacia clínica de dexmedetomidina vs. otras estrategias farmacológicas/placebo para el tratamiento del delirio hiperactivo.Facultad de Ciencias Médica

Contributing factors for acute stress in healthcare workers caring for COVID-19 patients in Argentina, Chile, Colombia, and Ecuador

This study analyzed the frequency and intensity of acute stress among health professionals caring for COVID-19 patients in four Latin American Spanish-speaking countries during the outbreak. A cross-sectional study involved a non-probability sample of healthcare professionals in four Latin American countries. Participants from each country were invited using a platform and mobile application designed for this study. Hospital and primary care workers from different services caring for COVID-19 patients were included. The EASE Scale (SARS-CoV-2 Emotional Overload Scale, in Spanish named Escala Auto-aplicada de Sobrecarga Emocional) was a previously validated measure of acute stress. EASE scores were described overall by age, sex, work area, and experience of being ill with COVID-19. Using the Mann–Whitney U test, the EASE scores were compared according to the most critical moments of the pandemic. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed to investigate associations between these factors and the outcome ‘acute stress’. Finally, the Kruskal–Wallis was used to compare EASE scores and the experience of being ill. A total of 1372 professionals responded to all the items in the EASE scale: 375 (27.3%) Argentines, 365 (26.6%) Colombians, 345 (25.1%) Chileans, 209 (15.2%) Ecuadorians, and 78 (5.7%) from other countries. 27% of providers suffered middle-higher acute stress due to the outbreak. Worse results were observed in moments of peak incidence of cases (14.3 ± 5.3 vs. 6.9 ± 1.7, p < 0.05). Higher scores were found in professionals in COVID-19 critical care (13 ± 1.2) than those in non-COVID-19 areas (10.7 ± 1.9) (p = 0.03). Distress was higher among professionals who were COVID-19 patients (11.7 ± 1) or had doubts about their potential infection (12 ± 1.2) compared to those not infected (9.5 ± 0.7) (p = 0.001). Around one-third of the professionals experienced acute stress, increasing in intensity as the incidence of COVID-19 increased and as they became infected or in doubt whether they were infected. EASE scale could be a valuable asset for monitoring acute stress levels among health professionals in Latin America.Fil: Martin Delgado, Jimmy. Universidad Catolica de Santiago de Guayaquil; EcuadorFil: Poblete, Rodrigo. Universidad de Santiago de Chile; ChileFil: Serpa, Piedad. Universidad Industrial Santander; ColombiaFil: Mula, Aurora. Hospital Universitario de Sant Joan D´alacant; EspañaFil: Carrillo, Irene. Universidad de Miguel Hernández; EspañaFil: Fernández, Cesar. Universidad de Miguel Hernández; EspañaFil: Vicente Ripoll, María Asunción. Universidad de Miguel Hernández; EspañaFil: Loudet, Cecilia. General José de San Martín de la Plata General Hospital; ArgentinaFil: Jorro, Facundo. Gobierno de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires. Hospital General de Niños Pedro Elizalde (ex Casa Cuna); ArgentinaFil: Garcia Elorrio, Ezequiel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Centro de Investigaciones en Epidemiología y Salud Pública. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria. Centro de Investigaciones en Epidemiología y Salud Pública; ArgentinaFil: Guilabert, Mercedes. Universidad de Miguel Hernández; EspañaFil: Mira, José Joaquín. Universidad de Miguel Hernández; Españ

Development of the Gastrointestinal Dysfunction Score (GIDS) for critically ill patients – A prospective multicenter observational study (iSOFA study)

Background & aims: To develop a five grade score (0–4 points) for the assessment of gastrointestinal (GI) dysfunction in adult critically ill patients. Methods: This prospective multicenter observational study enrolled consecutive adult patients admitted to 11 intensive care units in nine countries. At all sites, daily clinical data with emphasis on GI clinical symptoms were collected and intra-abdominal pressure measured. In five out of 11 sites, the biomarkers citrulline and intestinal fatty acid-binding protein (I-FABP) were measured additionally. Cox models with time-dependent scores were used to analyze associations with 28- and 90-day mortality. The models were estimated with stratification for study center. Results: We included 540 patients (224 with biomarker measurements) with median age of 65 years (range 18–94), the Simplified Acute Physiology Score II score of 38 (interquartile range 26–53) points, and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score of 6 (interquartile range 3–9) points at admission. Median ICU length of stay was 3 (interquartile range 1–6) days and 90-day mortality 18.9%. A new five grade Gastrointestinal Dysfunction Score (GIDS) was developed based on the rationale of the previously developed Acute GI Injury (AGI) grading. Citrulline and I-FABP did not prove their potential for scoring of GI dysfunction in critically ill. GIDS was independently associated with 28- and 90-day mortality when added to SOFA total score (HR 1.40; 95%CI 1.07–1.84 and HR 1.40; 95%CI 1.02–1.79, respectively) or to a model containing all SOFA subscores (HR 1.48; 95%CI 1.13–1.92 and HR 1.47; 95%CI 1.15–1.87, respectively), improving predictive power of SOFA score in all analyses. Conclusions: The newly developed GIDS is additive to SOFA score in prediction of 28- and 90-day mortality. The clinical usefulness of this score should be validated prospectively. Trial registration: NCT02613000, retrospectively registered 24 November 2015.SCOPUS: ar.jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe

Reducing pressure ulcers in patients with prolonged acute mechanical ventilation: A quasi-experimental study

Objetivo: Determinar a eficácia de um programa de gestão da qualidade para reduzir a incidência e a gravidade de úlceras por pressão em pacientes de terapia intensiva. Métodos: Estudo com metodologia quasi-experimental, antes-e-depois, conduzido em uma unidade de terapia intensiva clínica e cirúrgica. Incluíram-se os pacientes consecutivos que receberam ventilação mecânica por um período igual ou superior a 96 horas. Uma equipe de Melhoria de Processos delineou um processo de intervenção multifacetado, que consistiu de uma sessão educacional, uma lista de verificação de úlcera de pressão, um aplicativo para smartphone para monitoramento de lesões e um conjunto de normas de tomada de decisão, além de prevenção familiar. Resultados: O Grupo Pré-I incluiu 25 pacientes, e o Grupo Pós-I foi constituído por 69 pacientes. A incidência de úlcera de pressão nestes grupos foi de 41 (75%) e 37 (54%), respectivamente. O tempo mediano para o desenvolvimento das úlceras por pressão foi de 4,5 (4-5) dias no Grupo Pré-I e 9 (6-20) dias no Grupo Pós-I após a admissão para cada um dos períodos. A incidência de úlceras por pressão de grau avançado foi de 27 (49%) no Grupo Pré-I e 7 (10%) no Grupo Pós-I. A presença de úlceras por pressão na alta foi de 38 (69%) e 18 (26%), respectivamente, para os Grupos Pré-I e Pós-I (p < 0,05 para todas as comparações). A participação da família totalizou 9% no Grupo Pré-I e aumentou para 57% no Grupo Pós-I (p < 0,05). Utilizou-se um modelo de regressão logística para analisar os preditores de úlcera de pressão com grau avançado. A duração da ventilação mecânica e a presença de falência de órgão associaram-se positivamente com o desenvolvimento de úlceras por pressão, enquanto o programa multifacetado de intervenção atuou como fator de proteção. Conclusão: Um programa de qualidade, com base em um aplicativo para smartphone e na participação da família, pode reduzir a incidência e a gravidade de úlceras por pressão em pacientes com ventilação mecânica aguda prolongada.Objective: To determine the effectiveness of a quality management program in reducing the incidence and severity of pressure ulcers in critical care patients. Methods: This was a quasi-experimental, before-and-after study that was conducted in a medical-surgical intensive care unit. Consecutive patients who had received mechanical ventilation for ≥ 96 hours were included. A "Process Improvement" team designed a multifaceted interventional process that consisted of an educational session, a pressure ulcer checklist, a smartphone application for lesion monitoring and decision-making, and a "family prevention bundle". Results: Fifty-five patients were included in Pre-I group, and 69 were included in the Post-I group, and the incidence of pressure ulcers in these groups was 41 (75%) and 37 (54%), respectively. The median time for pressure ulcers to develop was 4.5 [4 - 5] days in the Pre-I group and 9 [6 - 20] days in the Post-I group after admission for each period. The incidence of advanced-grade pressure ulcers was 27 (49%) in the Pre-I group and 7 (10%) in the Post-I group, and finally, the presence of pressure ulcers at discharge was 38 (69%) and 18 (26%), respectively (p < 0.05 for all comparisons). Family participation totaled 9% in the Pre-I group and increased to 57% in the Post-I group (p < 0.05). A logistic regression model was used to analyze the predictors of advanced-grade pressure ulcers. The duration of mechanical ventilation and the presence of organ failure were positively associated with the development of pressure ulcers, while the multifaceted intervention program acted as a protective factor. Conclusion: A quality program based on both a smartphone application and family participation can reduce the incidence and severity of pressure ulcers in patients on prolonged acute mechanical ventilation.Facultad de Ciencias Médica