Standing to Challenge Federal Grant Termination

This Article analyzes how the various standing requirements impact on the ability of public non-profit, federally-funded grantees, to assert an effective legal challenge to a federal agency\u27s decision to terminate a grant previously awarded

Due Process and Federal Grant Termination: Challenging Agency Discretion Through a Reasons Requirement

This Article focuses on two potential sources of a grantee\u27s right to some kind of hearing to review a federal agency\u27s decision to terminate the grant relationship. The main objective is to demonstrate that the grantee has a property and/or liberty interest in the grant, which triggers procedural due process guarantees, and that the process due is notice of the possible deprivation of the grant and a pretermination hearing

Dean Robert L. Bogomolny: A Few Words about a Colleague and a Friend

A Tribute to Dean Robert L. Bogomoln

Towards a Comprehensive Approach to Clinical Education: A Response to the New Reality

In this Article, we describe one model through which the process could be initiated and the results evaluated within the economic and educational structure of the contemporary university law school

A.A.L.S. Clinical Legal Education Panel: Evaluation and Assessment of Student Performance in a Clinical Setting

This article is adapted from a panel discussion held under the auspices of the Section on Clinical Legal Education of the Association of American Law Schools, presented at the annual meeting in Phoenix, Arizona on January 5, 1980. The participants were H. Russell Cort, Jack L. Sammons, Robert S. Catz, Ralph S. Tyler and Terence J. Anderson