9 research outputs found
WRAPPING SURFACES TO CONTROL MOMENT ARM LENGTHS DURING A SQUAT TASK
Simulation of high flexion tasks such as squatting is hindered through invalid moment length estimation when using generic musculoskeletal (MSK) models. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of wrapping surface (WS) at the knee and hip joints on the muscle moment arms calculated using a MSK model during squatting tasks. A generic full body model was modified by (1) increasing knee and hip flexion range of motion (ROM), (2) adjusting translation and size parameters of two WS, and (3) implementing three additional WS. Muscle moment-arm lengths were calculated in OpenSim using motion capture data. The WS prevent muscles to cross into the bones, and the moment arm length of several hip extensors reach a plateau after 85Âş of hip flexion. The use of the modified MSK that includes additional WS is suited for the analysis of high flexion tasks
Comparing the Accuracy of Visual and Computerized Onset Detection Methods on Simulated Electromyography Signals with Varying Signal-to-Noise Ratios
Electromyography (EMG) onsets determined by computerized detection methods have been compared against the onsets selected by experts through visual inspection. However, with this type of approach, the true onset remains unknown, making it impossible to determine if computerized detection methods are better than visual detection (VD) as they can only be as good as what the experts select. The use of simulated signals allows for all aspects of the signal to be precisely controlled, including the onset and the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). This study compared three onset detection methods: approximated generalized likelihood ratio, double threshold (DT), and VD determined by eight trained individuals. The selected onset was compared against the true onset in simulated signals which varied in the SNR from 5 to 40 dB. For signals with 5 dB SNR, the VD method was significantly better, but for SNRs of 20 dB or greater, no differences existed between the VD and DT methods. The DT method is recommended as it can improve objectivity and reduce time of analysis when determining EMG onsets. Even for the best-quality signals (SNR of 40 dB), all the detection methods were off by 15–30 ms from the true onset and became progressively more inaccurate as the SNR decreased. Therefore, although all the detection methods provided similar results, they can be off by 50–80 ms from the true onset as the SNR decreases to 10 dB. Caution must be used when interpreting EMG onsets, especially on signals where the SNR is low or not reported at all
Spine, Pelvis and Hip Kinematics—Characterizing the Axial Plane in Healthy and Osteoarthritic Hips
Abnormal spinopelvic movements are associated with inferior outcomes following total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study aims to (1) characterize the agreement between dynamic motion and radiographic sagittal assessments of the spine, pelvis, and hip; (2) determine the effect of hip osteoarthritis (OA) on kinematics by comparing healthy individuals with pre-THA patients suffering from uni- or bilateral hip OA. Twenty-four OA patients pre-THA and eight healthy controls underwent lateral spinopelvic radiographs in standing and seated bend-and-reach (SBR) positions. Lumbar-lordosis (LL), sacral-slope (SS), and pelvic–femoral (PFA) angles were measured in both positions, and the differences (Δ) between SBR and standing were computed to assess spine flexion (SF), pelvic tilt (PT), and hip flexion (HF), respectively. Dynamic SBR and seated maximal trunk rotation (STR) tasks were performed at the biomechanics laboratory. Peak sagittal and axial kinematics for spine, pelvis, and hip, and range of motion (ROM), were calculated for SBR and STR. Radiograph readings correlated with sagittal kinematics during SBR for ΔLL and SFmax (r = 0.66, p < 0.001), ΔPT and PTmax (r = 0.44, p = 0.014), and ΔPFA and HFmax (r = 0.70, p < 0.001), with a satisfactory agreement in Bland–Altman analyses. Sagittal SBR spinal (r = 0.33, p = 0.022) and pelvic (r =0.35, p = 0.018) flexions correlated with the axial STR rotations. All axial spinopelvic parameters were different between the OA patients and controls, with the latter exhibiting significantly greater mobility and less variability. Bilaterally affected patients exhibited lower peak and ROM compared to controls. The biomechanics laboratory performed reliable assessments of spinopelvic and hip characteristics, in which the axial plane can be included. The sagittal and axial pelvic kinematics correlate, illustrating that pelvic rotation abnormalities are likely also contributing to the inferior outcomes seen in patients with abnormal spinopelvic flexion characteristics. Axial rotations of the pelvis and spine were least in patients with bilateral hip disease, further emphasizing the importance of the hip–pelvic–spine interaction
BOPS: a Matlab toolbox to batch musculoskeletal data processing for OpenSim
This paper presents Batch OpenSim Processing Scripts (BOPS), a Matlab toolbox for batch processing common OpenSim procedures: Inverse Kinematics, Inverse Dynamics, Muscle Analysis, Static Optimization, and Joint Reaction Analysis. BOPS is an easy-to-use and highly configurable tool that aims to reduce the time required to process large datasets, thus fostering the adoption of musculoskeletal modeling and simulations in daily practice. Its graphical user interface includes pre-defined setup files and has been designed to fulfill the needs of different research projects by simplifying the customization of the procedures, facilitating the analysis, and boosting research group collaborations. BOPS is released under Apache License 2.0, and its source code is freely available on SimTK and GitHub
A custom musculoskeletal model for estimation of medial and lateral tibiofemoral contact forces during tasks with high knee and hip flexions
Association between the Strength of Flexor Hallucis Brevis and Abductor Hallucis and Foot Mobility in Recreational Runners
Different measurements of foot morphological characteristics can effectively predict foot muscle strength. However, it is still uncertain if structural and postural alterations leading to foot pronation could be compensated with more efficient function of the intrinsic foot muscles and how mobility and strength are associated. Additionally, the relationship between foot mobility and the strength of the intrinsic muscles that control the foot arch is still unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the morphological parameters between dominant and non-dominant feet and the relationship between the intrinsic foot muscle strength and foot mobility in recreational runners. We used a cross-sectional study design to evaluate twenty-four healthy recreational runners (minimum 15 km/week) with an average training history of 70 ± 60 months. Foot Posture Index (FPI-6), isometric intrinsic muscle strength, overall morphology, and normalized mobility of both feet were assessed. Parametric tests analyzed the unidimensional measures, and paired analysis determined differences between dominant and non-dominant sides. Pearson’s and Spearman’s correlation coefficients determined the relationships between normalized strength and the variables of interest (CI = 95%). There was no significant association between intrinsic foot muscle strength and mobility. The only difference observed was between the dominant and non-dominant foot regarding the normalized foot length and midfoot width during non-weight-bearing, with small and medium effect sizes, respectively. Neither foot morphology nor foot mobility was associated with strength from intrinsic foot muscles in healthy recreational runners. Further work should explore the relationship investigated in our study with professional athletes and runners with symptomatic lower limb injuries to potentialize training and rehabilitation protocols