The social construction and consequences of groundwater modelling: insight from the Mancha Oriental aquifer, Spain

[EN] Groundwater flow models have been increasingly used to support policy making. A substantial amount of research has been dedicated to improving, validating and calibrating models and including stakeholders in the modelling process. However, little research has been done to analyze how the choices of model makers and steering by policy makers result in models with specific characteristics, which only allow specific modelling outcomes, and how the use of these modelling outcomes leads to specific social, economic and environmental consequences. In this study, we use the social construction of technology framework to explore the development, characteristics and uses of the groundwater model of the Mancha Oriental aquifer in Spain. The specific characteristics and functioning of this model influenced the policy implementation, implying that involving stakeholders in the development and use of models is crucial for improved democratic policy making.This work was carried out as part of the collaboration agreement between the University of Castilla–La Mancha and Wageningen University. The research is also part of Femke Rambags’ MSc Thesis. David Sanz was supported by the Grants for Stays at Other Universities and Research Centres (UCLM). Special thanks go to the Júcar Water Authority (CHJ) and stakeholders (JCRMO) in the Mancha Oriental System for the necessary information. We would also like to thank Dr A. Sahuquillo of the Universitat Politècnica de València de Valencia and Dr S. Castaño of the University of Castilla–La Mancha for comments and participation in the first stage of modelling. The contents of this paper do not represent the views of CHJ or JCRMO. Finally, we thank the two anonymous reviewers of this article for their valuable comments and suggestions.Sanz Martínez, D.; Vos, J.; Rambags, F.; Hoogesteger, J.; Cassiraga, EF.; Gómez-Alday, JJ. (2018). The social construction and consequences of groundwater modelling: insight from the Mancha Oriental aquifer, Spain. International Journal of Water Resources Development. 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/07900627.2018.1495619S122Beall, A. M., & Ford, A. (2010). Reports from the Field. International Journal of Information Systems and Social Change, 1(2), 72-89. doi:10.4018/jissc.2010040105Beven, K. (2000). On model uncertainty, risk and decision making. Hydrological Processes, 14(14), 2605-2606. doi:10.1002/1099-1085(20001015)14:143.0.co;2-wBijker, W. E. (s. f.). Social Construction of Technology. A Companion to the Philosophy of Technology, 88-94. doi:10.1002/9781444310795.ch15Bots, P. W. G., Bijlsma, R., von Korff, Y., Van der Fluit, N., & Wolters, H. (2011). Supporting the Constructive Use of Existing Hydrological Models in Participatory Settings: a Set of “Rules of the Game” Ecology and Society, 16(2). doi:10.5751/es-03643-160216Budds, J. (2009). Contested H2O: Science, policy and politics in water resources management in Chile. Geoforum, 40(3), 418-430. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.12.008CALERA, A., GARRIDO-RUBIO, J., BELMONTE, M., ARELLANO, I., FRAILE, L., CAMPOS, I., & OSANN, A. (2017). REMOTE SENSING-BASED WATER ACCOUNTING TO SUPPORT GOVERNANCE FOR GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT FOR IRRIGATION IN LA MANCHA ORIENTAL AQUIFER, SPAIN. Water Resources Management IX. doi:10.2495/wrm170121Cassiraga, E., Sanz, D., Castaño, S. Álvarez, O. & Sahuquillo, A. (2013). Modelo de flujo subterráneo de los acuíferos de la Mancha Oriental y sus relaciones con el río Júcar [Groundwater model flow of the Mancha Oriental Aquifer and their relations with the Júcar River]. Unpublished report (pp 77). Confederación Hidrográfica del Júcar.Castaño, S., Sanz, D., & Gómez-Alday, J. J. (2009). Methodology for Quantifying Groundwater Abstractions for Agriculture via Remote Sensing and GIS. Water Resources Management, 24(4), 795-814. doi:10.1007/s11269-009-9473-7Castaño, S., Sanz, D., & Gómez-Alday, J. J. (2013). Sensitivity of a Groundwater Flow Model to Both Climatic Variations and Management Scenarios in a Semi-arid Region of SE Spain. Water Resources Management, 27(7), 2089-2101. doi:10.1007/s11269-013-0277-4Castilla-Rho, J. C. (2017). Groundwater Modeling with Stakeholders: Finding the Complexity that Matters. Groundwater, 55(5), 620-625. doi:10.1111/gwat.12569Doherty, J., & Simmons, C. T. (2013). Groundwater modelling in decision support: reflections on a unified conceptual framework. Hydrogeology Journal, 21(7), 1531-1537. doi:10.1007/s10040-013-1027-7Ferrer, J. & Garijo, L. (2013). Mercados del agua y flexibilización del marco concesional [Water markets and flexibilization of the concessional framework]. XI Semin. Nac. “Transparencia y concesiones” Obs. del Agua la Fund. Botín.Forsyth, T. (2004). Critical Political Ecology. doi:10.4324/9780203017562Giordano, M. (2009). Global Groundwater? Issues and Solutions. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 34(1), 153-178. doi:10.1146/annurev.environ.030308.100251Hernández-Mora, N., del Moral Ituarte, L., La-Roca, F., La Calle, A., & Schmidt, G. (2014). Interbasin Water Transfers in Spain: Interregional Conflicts and Governance Responses. Globalized Water, 175-194. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-7323-3_13Holley, C., Sinclair, D., Lopez-Gunn, E., & Schlager, E. (2016). Conjunctive Management Through Collective Action. Integrated Groundwater Management, 229-252. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-23576-9_9Hoogesteger, J., & Wester, P. (2015). Intensive groundwater use and (in)equity: Processes and governance challenges. Environmental Science & Policy, 51, 117-124. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2015.04.004Hoogesteger, J., & Wester, P. (2017). Regulating groundwater use: The challenges of policy implementation in Guanajuato, Central Mexico. Environmental Science & Policy, 77, 107-113. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2017.08.002Jakeman, A. J., Barreteau, O., Hunt, R. J., Rinaudo, J.-D., Ross, A., Arshad, M., & Hamilton, S. (2016). Integrated Groundwater Management: An Overview of Concepts and Challenges. Integrated Groundwater Management, 3-20. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-23576-9_1Kahil, M. T., Ward, F. A., Albiac, J., Eggleston, J., & Sanz, D. (2016). Hydro-economic modeling with aquifer–river interactions to guide sustainable basin management. Journal of Hydrology, 539, 510-524. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.05.057Konikow, L. F., & Bredehoeft, J. D. (1992). Ground-water models cannot be validated. Advances in Water Resources, 15(1), 75-83. doi:10.1016/0309-1708(92)90033-xKonikow, L. F., & Kendy, E. (2005). Groundwater depletion: A global problem. Hydrogeology Journal, 13(1), 317-320. doi:10.1007/s10040-004-0411-8Lopez-Gunn, E. (2003). The Role of Collective Action in Water Governance: A Comparative Study of Groundwater User Associations in La Mancha Aquifers in Spain. Water International, 28(3), 367-378. doi:10.1080/02508060308691711Massuel, S., Cappelaere, B., Favreau, G., Leduc, C., Lebel, T., & Vischel, T. (2011). Integrated surface water–groundwater modelling in the context of increasing water reserves of a regional Sahelian aquifer. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 56(7), 1242-1264. doi:10.1080/02626667.2011.609171Melsen, L. A., Addor, N., Mizukami, N., Newman, A. J., Torfs, P. J. J. F., Clark, M. P., … Teuling, A. J. (2018). Mapping (dis)agreement in hydrologic projections. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 22(3), 1775-1791. doi:10.5194/hess-22-1775-2018MOLLE, F. (2008). Why Enough Is Never Enough: The Societal Determinants of River Basin Closure. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 24(2), 217-226. doi:10.1080/07900620701723646Narain, V., & Singh, A. K. (2017). Flowing against the current: The socio-technical mediation of water (in)security in periurban Gurgaon, India. Geoforum, 81, 66-75. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.02.010Pérez, M. A. (2005). Modelo distribuido de simulación del ciclo hidrológico con calidad de aguas integrado en sistemas de información geográfica para grandes cuencas [Distributed model of simulation of the hydrological cycle with water quality integrated in geographic information systems for large basins]. (Ph.D. Thesis). Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, Spain.Rambags, F. (2014). The social shaping of the hydrological model of the Mancha Oriental System. (Msc Thesis Water resources management). Wageningen University.Refsgaard, J. C., & Henriksen, H. J. (2004). Modelling guidelines––terminology and guiding principles. Advances in Water Resources, 27(1), 71-82. doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2003.08.006Sanz, D., Calera, A., Castaño, S., & Gómez-Alday, J. J. (2015). Knowledge, participation, and transparency in groundwater management. Water Policy, wp2015024. doi:10.2166/wp.2015.024Sanz, D., Castaño, S., Cassiraga, E., Sahuquillo, A., Gómez-Alday, J. J., Peña, S., & Calera, A. (2011). Modeling aquifer–river interactions under the influence of groundwater abstraction in the Mancha Oriental System (SE Spain). Hydrogeology Journal, 19(2), 475-487. doi:10.1007/s10040-010-0694-xSanz, D., Gómez-Alday, J. J., Castaño, S., Moratalla, A., De las Heras, J., & Martínez-Alfaro, P. E. (2009). Hydrostratigraphic framework and hydrogeological behaviour of the Mancha Oriental System (SE Spain). Hydrogeology Journal, 17(6), 1375-1391. doi:10.1007/s10040-009-0446-yTortajada, C. (2010). Water Governance: Some Critical Issues. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 26(2), 297-307. doi:10.1080/07900621003683298Vaux, H. (2010). Groundwater under stress: the importance of management. Environmental Earth Sciences, 62(1), 19-23. doi:10.1007/s12665-010-0490-xVoinov, A., & Bousquet, F. (2010). Modelling with stakeholders☆. Environmental Modelling & Software, 25(11), 1268-1281. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.03.007Voinov, A., Kolagani, N., McCall, M. K., Glynn, P. D., Kragt, M. E., Ostermann, F. O., … Ramu, P. (2016). Modelling with stakeholders – Next generation. Environmental Modelling & Software, 77, 196-220. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.11.016Voss, C. I. (2011). Editor’s message: Groundwater modeling fantasies —part 1, adrift in the details. Hydrogeology Journal, 19(7), 1281-1284. doi:10.1007/s10040-011-0789-zWester, P., Hoogesteger, J. & Vincent, L. (2009). Local IWRM organizations for groundwater regulation: The experiences of the Aquifer Management Councils (COTAS) in Guanajuato, Mexico. Natural Resources Forum 33(1), 29–38. doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-8947.2009.01206.

Stochastic upscaling of hydrodynamic dispersion and retardation factor in a physically and chemically heterogeneous tropical soil

[EN] Stochastic upscaling of flow and reactive solute transport in a tropical soil is performed using real data collected in the laboratory. Upscaling of hydraulic conductivity, longitudinal hydrodynamic dispersion, and retardation factor were done using three different approaches of varying complexity. How uncertainty propagates after upscaling was also studied. The results show that upscaling must be taken into account if a good reproduction of the flow and transport behavior of a given soil is to be attained when modeled at larger than laboratory scales. The results also show that arrival time uncertainty was well reproduced after solute transport upscaling. This work represents a first demonstration of flow and reactive transport upscaling in a soil based on laboratory data. It also shows how simple upscaling methods can be incorporated into daily modeling practice using commercial flow and transport codes.The authors thank the financial support by the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) (Project 401441/2014-8). The doctoral fellowship award to the first author by the Coordination of Improvement of Higher Level Personnel (CAPES) is acknowledged. The first author also thanks the international mobility grant awarded by CNPq, through the Sciences Without Borders program (Grant Number: 200597/2015-9). The international mobility grant awarded by Santander Mobility in cooperation with the University of Sao Paulo is also acknowledged. DHI-WASI is gratefully thanked for providing a FEFLOW license.Almeida De-Godoy, V.; Zuquette, L.; Gómez-Hernández, JJ. (2019). Stochastic upscaling of hydrodynamic dispersion and retardation factor in a physically and chemically heterogeneous tropical soil. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment. 33(1):201-216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-018-1624-zS201216331Ahuja LR, Naney JW, Green RE, Nielsen DR (1984) Macroporosity to characterize spatial variability of hydraulic conductivity and effects of land management. Soil Sci Soc Am J 48:699. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1984.03615995004800040001xBellin A, Lawrence AE, Rubin Y (2004) Models of sub-grid variability in numerical simulations of solute transport in heterogeneous porous formations: three-dimensional flow and effect of pore-scale dispersion. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 18:31–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-003-0164-2Brent RP (1973) Algorithms for minimization without derivatives. Prentice Hall, Englewood CliffsBrusseau ML (1998) Non-ideal transport of reactive solutes in heterogeneous porous media: 3. model testing and data analysis using calibration versus prediction. J Hydrol 209:147–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(98)00121-8Brusseau ML, Srivastava R (1999) Nonideal transport of reactive solutes in heterogeneous porous media: 4. Analysis of the cape cod natural-gradient field experiment. Water Resour Res 35:1113–1125. https://doi.org/10.1029/1998WR900019Brutsaert W (1967) Some methods of calculating unsaturated permeability. Trans ASAE 10:400–404Cadini F, De Sanctis J, Bertoli I, Zio E (2013) Upscaling of a dual-permeability Monte Carlo simulation model for contaminant transport in fractured networks by genetic algorithm parameter identification. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 27:505–516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-012-0595-8Cambardella CA, Moorman TB, Parkin TB, Karlen DL, Novak JM, Turco RF, Konopka AE (1994) Field-scale variability of soil properties in central iowa soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 58:1501. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1994.03615995005800050033xCapilla JE, Rodrigo J, Gómez-Hernández JJ (1999) Simulation of non-Gaussian transmissivity fields honoring piezometric data and integrating soft and secondary information. Math Geol 31:907–927. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007580902175Cassiraga EF, Fernàndez-Garcia D, Gómez-Hernández JJ (2005) Performance assessment of solute transport upscaling methods in the context of nuclear waste disposal. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 42:756–764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2005.03.013Corey AT (1977) Mechanics of heterogeneous fluids in porous media. Water Resources Publications, Fort Collins, CO, p 259Dagan G (1989) Flow and transport in porous formations. Springer, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-75015-1Dagan G (2004) On application of stochastic modeling of groundwater flow and transport. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-004-0191-7de Azevedo AAB, Pressinotti MMN, Massoli M (1981) Sedimentological studies of the Botucatu and Pirambóia formations in the region of Santa Rita do Passa Quatro (In portuguese). Rev do Inst Geológico 2:31–38. https://doi.org/10.5935/0100-929X.19810003Deng H, Dai Z, Wolfsberg AV, Ye M, Stauffer PH, Lu Z, Kwicklis E (2013) Upscaling retardation factor in hierarchical porous media with multimodal reactive mineral facies. Chemosphere 91:248–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.10.105Diersch H-JG (2014) Finite element modeling of flow, mass and heat transport in porous and fractured media. Springer, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38739-5Dippenaar MA (2014) Porosity reviewed: quantitative multi-disciplinary understanding, recent advances and applications in vadose zone hydrology. Geotech Geol Eng 32:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-013-9704-9Fagundes JRT, Zuquette LV (2011) Sorption behavior of the sandy residual unconsolidated materials from the sandstones of the Botucatu Formation, the main aquifer of Brazil. Environ Earth Sci 62:831–845. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-010-0570-yFenton GA, Griffiths DV (2008) Risk assessment in geotechnical engineering. Wiley, p 463Fernàndez-Garcia D, Gómez-Hernández JJ (2007) Impact of upscaling on solute transport: Traveltimes, scale dependence of dispersivity, and propagation of uncertainty. Water Resour Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004727Fernàndez-Garcia D, Llerar-Meza G, Gómez-Hernández JJ (2009) Upscaling transport with mass transfer models: mean behavior and propagation of uncertainty. Water Resour Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR007764Feyen L, Gómez-Hernández JJ, Ribeiro PJ, Beven KJ, De Smedt F (2003a) A Bayesian approach to stochastic capture zone delineation incorporating tracer arrival times, conductivity measurements, and hydraulic head observations. Water Resour Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2002WR001544Feyen L, Ribeiro PJ, Gómez-Hernández JJ, Beven KJ, De Smedt F (2003b) Bayesian methodology for stochastic capture zone delineation incorporating transmissivity measurements and hydraulic head observations. J Hydrol 271:156–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(02)00314-1Forsythe GE, Malcolm MA, Moler CB (1976) Computer methods for mathematical computations. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, p 259Freeze R, Cherry J (1979) Groundwater. PrenticeHall Inc, Englewood cliffs, p 604Frippiat CC, Holeyman AE (2008) A comparative review of upscaling methods for solute transport in heterogeneous porous media. J Hydrol 362:150–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.08.015Fu J, Gómez-Hernández JJ (2009) Uncertainty assessment and data worth in groundwater flow and mass transport modeling using a blocking Markov chain Monte Carlo method. J Hydrol 364:328–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.11.014Gelhar LW, Axness CL (1983) Three-dimensional stochastic analysis of macrodispersion in aquifers. Water Resour Res 19:161–180. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR019i001p00161Gelhar LW, Welty C, Rehfeldt KR (1992) A critical review of data on field-scale dispersion in aquifers. Water Resour Res 28:1955–1974. https://doi.org/10.1029/92WR00607Giacheti HL, Rohm SA, Nogueira JB, Cintra JCA (1993) Geotechnical properties of the Cenozoic sediment (in protuguese). In: Albiero JH, Cintra JCA (eds) Soil from the interior of São Paulo. ABMS, Sao Paulo, pp 143–175Gómez-Hernandez JJ (1990) A stochastic approach to the simulation of block conductivity fields conditional upon data measured at a smaller scale. Stanford University, StanfordGómez-Hernández JJ, Gorelick SM (1989) Effective groundwater model parameter values: influence of spatial variabiity of hydraulic conductivity, leackance, and recharge. Water Resour Res 25:405–419Gómez-Hernández JJ, Journel A (1993) Joint sequential simulation of multigaussian fields. In: Geostatistics Tróia’92. pp 85–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1739-5_8Gómez-Hernández JJ, Wen X-H (1994) Probabilistic assessment of travel times in groundwater modeling. Stoch Hydrol Hydraul 8:19–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01581389Gómez-Hernández JJ, Fu J, Fernandez-Garcia D (2006) Upscaling retardation factors in 2-D porous media. In: Bierkens MFP, Gehrels JC, Kovar K (eds) Calibration and reliability in groundwater modelling: from uncertainty to decision making: proceedings of the ModelCARE 2005 conference held in The Hague, The Netherlands, 6–9 June, 2005. IAHS Publication, pp 130–136Goovaerts P (1999) Geostatistics in soil science: state-of-the-art and perspectives. Geoderma 89:1–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7061(98)00078-0Jarvis NJ (2007) A review of non-equilibrium water fl ow and solute transport in soil macropores: principles, controlling factors and consequences for water quality. Eur J Soil Sci 58:523–546. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjss2011-050Jellali S, Diamantopoulos E, Kallali H, Bennaceur S, Anane M, Jedidi N (2010) Dynamic sorption of ammonium by sandy soil in fixed bed columns: evaluation of equilibrium and non-equilibrium transport processes. J Environ Manag 91:897–905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.11.006Journel AG, Gomez-Hernandez JJ (1993) Stochastic imaging of the wilmington clastic sequence. SPE Form Eval 8:33–40. https://doi.org/10.2118/19857-PAJournel A, Deutsch C, Desbarats A (1986) Power averaging for block effective permeability. Proc SPE Calif Reg Meet. https://doi.org/10.2118/15128-MSKronberg BI, Fyfe WS, Leonardos OH, Santos AM (1979) The chemistry of some Brazilian soils: element mobility during intense weathering. Chem Geol 24:211–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2541(79)90124-4Lake LW (1988) The origins of anisotropy (includes associated papers 18394 and 18458). J Pet Technol 40:395–396. https://doi.org/10.2118/17652-PALawrence AE, Rubin Y (2007) Block-effective macrodispersion for numerical simulations of sorbing solute transport in heterogeneous porous formations. Adv Water Resour 30:1272–1285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2006.11.005Lemke LD, Barrack WA II, Abriola LM, Goovaerts P (2004) Matching solute breakthrough with deterministic and stochastic aquifer models. Groundwater 42:920–934Li L, Zhou H, Gómez-Hernández JJ (2011a) A comparative study of three-dimensional hydraulic conductivity upscaling at the macro-dispersion experiment (MADE) site, Columbus Air Force Base, Mississippi (USA). J Hydrol 404:278–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.05.001Li L, Zhou H, Gómez-Hernández JJ (2011b) Transport upscaling using multi-rate mass transfer in three-dimensional highly heterogeneous porous media. Adv Water Resour 34:478–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2011.01.001Logsdon Keller KE, Moorman TB (2002) Measured and predicted solute leaching from multiple undisturbed soil columns. Soil Sci Soc Am J 66:686–695. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2002.6860Lourens A, van Geer FC (2016) Uncertainty propagation of arbitrary probability density functions applied to upscaling of transmissivities. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 30:237–249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-015-1075-8Mahapatra IC, Singh KN, Pillai KG, Bapat SR (1985) Rice soils and their management. Indian J Agron 30:R1–R41Morakinyo JA, Mackay R (2006) Geostatistical modelling of ground conditions to support the assessment of site contamination. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 20:106–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-005-0015-4Moslehi M, de Barros FPJ, Ebrahimi F, Sahimi M (2016) Upscaling of solute transport in disordered porous media by wavelet transformations. Adv Water Resour 96:180–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2016.07.013Osinubi KJ, Nwaiwu CM (2005) Hydraulic conductivity of compacted lateritic soil. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 131:1034–1041. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:8(1034)Remy N (2004) SGeMS: stanford geostatistical modeling software. Softw Man. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-3610-1_89Renard P, de Marsily G (1997) Calculating equivalent permeability: a review. Adv Water Resour 20:253–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1708(96)00050-4Robin MJL, Sudicky EA, Gillham RW, Kachanoski RG (1991) Spatial variability of strontium distribution coefficients and their correlation with hydraulic conductivity in the Canadian forces base borden aquifer. Water Resour Res 27:2619–2632. https://doi.org/10.1029/91WR01107Salamon P, Fernàndez-Garcia D, Gómez-Hernández JJ (2007) Modeling tracer transport at the MADE site: the importance of heterogeneity. Water Resour Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006WR005522Sánchez-Vila X, Carrera J, Girardi JP (1996) Scale effects in transmissivity. J Hydrol 183:1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(96)80031-XScheibe T, Yabusaki S (1998) Scaling of flow and transport behavior in heterogeneous groundwater systems. Adv Water Resour 22:223–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1708(98)00014-1Selvadurai PA, Selvadurai APS (2014) On the effective permeability of a heterogeneous porous medium: the role of the geometric mean. Philos Mag 94:2318–2338. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786435.2014.913111Shackelford CD (1994) Critical concepts for column testing. J Geotech Eng 120:1804–1828. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(95)96996-OŠimůnek J, van Genuchten MT, Šejna M, Toride N, Leij FJ (1999) The STANMOD computer software for evaluating solute transport in porous media using analytical solutions of convection-dispersion equation. Riverside, CaliforniaTaskinen A, Sirviö H, Bruen M (2008) Modelling effects of spatial variability of saturated hydraulic conductivity on autocorrelated overland flow data: linear mixed model approach. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 22:67–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-006-0099-5Tuli A, Hopmans JW, Rolston DE, Moldrup P (2005) Comparison of air and water permeability between disturbed and undisturbed soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 69:1361. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2004.0332Tyukhova AR, Willmann M (2016) Conservative transport upscaling based on information of connectivity. Water Resour Res 52:6867–6880. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR018331van Genuchten MTh (1980) Determining transport parameters from solute displacement experiments. Research Report 118. U.S. Salinity Lab., Riverside, CAVanderborght J, Timmerman A, Feyen J (2000) Solute transport for steady-state and transient flow in soils with and without macropores. Soil Sci Soc Am J 64:1305–1317. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2000.6441305xVanmarcke E (2010) Random fields: analysis and synthesis. World Scientific. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, p 364Vishal V, Leung JY (2017) Statistical scale-up of 3D particle-tracking simulation for non-Fickian dispersive solute transport modeling. Environ Res Risk Assess, Stoch. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-017-1501-1Wen X-H, Gómez-Hernández JJ (1996) Upscaling hydraulic conductivities in heterogeneous media: an overview. J Hydrol 183:ix–xxxii. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(96)80030-8Wen XH, Gómez-Hernández JJ (1998) Numerical modeling of macrodispersion in heterogeneous media: a comparison of multi-Gaussian and non-multi-Gaussian models. J Contam Hydrol 30:129–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7722(97)00035-1Wen XH, Capilla JE, Deutsch CV, Gómez-Hernández JJ, Cullick AS (1999) A program to create permeability fields that honor single-phase flow rate and pressure data. Comput Geosci 25:217–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-3004(98)00126-5Wilding LP, Drees LR (1983) Spatial variability and pedology. In: Wilding LP, Smeck NE, Hall GF (eds) Pedogenesis and soil taxonomy: the soil orders. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 83–116Willmann M, Carrera J, Guadagnini A (2006) Block-upscaling of transport in heterogeneous aquifers. h2ogeo.upc.edu 1–7Xu Z, Meakin P (2013) Upscaling of solute transport in heterogeneous media with non-uniform flow and dispersion fields. Appl Math Model 37:8533–8542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2013.03.070Zech A, Attinger S, Cvetkovic V, Dagan G, Dietrich P, Fiori A, Rubin Y, Teutsch G (2015) Is unique scaling of aquifer macrodispersivity supported by field data? Water Resour Res 51:7662–7679. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017220Zhou H, Li L, Gómez-Hernández JJ (2010) Three-dimensional hydraulic conductivity upscaling in groundwater modeling. Comput Geosci 36:1224–1235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2010.03.008Zhou H, Li L, Hendricks Franssen H-J, Gómez-Hernández JJ (2012) Pattern recognition in a bimodal aquifer using the normal-score ensemble Kalman filter. Math Geosci 44:169–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-011-9372-

Geometry of the modelled freshwater/salt-water interface under variable-density-driven flow (Pétrola Lake, SE Spain)

Pétrola Lake in southeast Spain is one of the most representative examples of hypersaline wetlands in southern Europe. The rich ecosystem and environmental importance of this lake are closely associated with the hydrogeological behaviour of the system. The wetland is fed by the underlying aquifer with relatively fresh groundwater—1gL−1 of total dissolved solids (TDS)—with a centripetal direction towards the wetland. In addition, the high evaporation rates of the region promote an increase in the concentration of salts in the lake water, occasionally higher than 80 g L−1 TDS. The density difference between the superficial lake water and the regional groundwater can reach up to 0.25 g cm−3, causing gravitational instability and density-driven flow (DDF) under the lake bottom. The objective of this study was to gain an understanding of the geometry of the freshwatersaltwater interface by means of two-dimensional mathematical modelling and geophysical-resistivity-profile surveys. The magnitude and direction of mixed convective flows, generated by DDF, support the hypothesis that the autochthonous reactive organic matter produced in the lake by biomass can be transported effectively towards the freshwater–saltwater interface areas (e.g. springs in the lake edge), where previous research described biogeochemical processes of natural attenuation of nitrate pollution

Modeling aquifer-river interactions under the influence of groundwater abstraction in the Mancha Oriental System (SE Spain)

The Mancha Oriental System (MOS, 7,260 km2) is one of the largest aquifers within Spain, and is encompassed by the Jucar River Basin. Over the past 30 years, socioeconomic development within the region has been largely due to intensive use of groundwater resources for irrigating crops (1,000 km2). Groundwater pumping (406 million m3/year) has provoked a steady drop in the groundwater level and a reduction of MOS discharge to the Jucar River. The study aims to characterize the river-aquifer relationship, to determine the influence that groundwater abstraction has on the river discharge. This research has advanced a three-dimensional large-scale numerical groundwater-flow model (MODFLOW 2000) in order to spatially and temporally evaluate, quantify and predict the river-aquifer interactions that are influenced by groundwater abstraction in MOS. It is demonstrated that although groundwater abstraction increased considerably from the early 1980s to 2000, the depletion of water stored in the aquifer was lower than might be expected. This is mainly due to aquifer recharge from the Jucar River, induced by groundwater abstraction. The area of disconnection between the river and the water table (i. e. where groundwater head is lower than the riverbed) is found to have spread 20km downstream from its position before pumping started. © 2010 Springer-Verlag.This study was funded by the Spanish Government under research grant CGL2008-06394-C02-02/BTE. Special thanks go to the Jucar Water Authority (CHJ) and stakeholders (JCRMO) in the Mancha Oriental System for providing the information necessary. The content of this report does not represent the view of CHJ and JCRMO.Sanz, D.; Castano, S.; Cassiraga ., EF.; Sahuquillo Herráiz, A.; Gomez-Alday, J.; Peña Haro, S.; Calera, A. (2011). Modeling aquifer-river interactions under the influence of groundwater abstraction in the Mancha Oriental System (SE Spain). HYDROGEOLOGY JOURNAL. 19(2):475-487. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-010-0694-xS475487192Calera A, Medrano J, Vela A, Castaño S (1999) GIS tools applied to the sustainable management of hydric resources: application to the aquifer system 08-29. Agric Water Manage 40:207–220Calver A (2001) Riverbed permeabilities: information from pooled data. Ground Water 39:546–555Castaño S, Sanz D, Gómez-Alday JJ (2009) Methodology for quantifying groundwater abstractions for agriculture via remote sensing and GIS. Water Resour Manage 24:795–814DGOH (1988) Estudio de la explotación de aguas subterráneas en el acuífero de la Mancha Oriental y su influencia sobre los caudales del río Júcar [Study of the exploitation of groundwater in the Mancha Oriental Aquifer and its influence of the Jucar river flow]. DGOH, MadridDGOH (1993) Estudio de seguimiento de impacto de las extracciones de aguas subterráneas en los acuíferos de la Mancha Oriental y los caudales del río Júcar. Masrid [Monitoring study of the impact of groundwater abstractions on Mancha Oriental Aquifer and Jucar river flow]. DGOH, MadridDoherty J (2004) PEST model-independent parameter estimation users manual. Watermark, Brisbane, AustraliaEstrela T (2004) Jucar Pilot River Basin: provisional article 5 report pursuant to the Water Framework Directive. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, Valencia, Spain Available via http://www.phjucar.com/docs/otros_docs/Article_5_complete.pdf . Cited 09 November 2010Fernández-Sanchez JA, Lucena Bonny C, Tapia Granados F (1983) Descripción y resultados del modelo matemático del acuífero de Albacete [Description and results of mathematical modelling of the aquifers in Albacete]. III Simposio de Hidrogeología, IGME, Madrid, pp 125–131Fleckenstein JH, Suzuki E, Fogg G (2001) Options for conjunctive water management to restore fall flows in the Consumnes River basin, California. In: Mariño MA, Simnovic SP (eds) Integrated water resources management. IAHS publication 272, IAHS, Wallingford, UK, pp 175–182Fleckenstein JH, Anderson M, Fogg G, Mount J (2004) Managing surface water-groundwater to restore fall flows in the Cosumnes River. J Water Resour Plann Manage 130(4):301–310Fleckenstein JH, Niswonger RG, Fogg G (2006) River–aquifer interactions, geologic heterogeneity, and low-flow management. Ground Water 44:837–852Font E (2004) Colaboración y desarrollo de un modelo matemático distribuido de flujo subterráneo de la Unidad Hidrogeológica 08.29 Mancha Oriental en las provincias de Albacete, Cuenca y Valencia [Collaboration and development of a distributed mathematical model of groundwater flow in the hydrogeological unit 08.29, Eastern Mancha in Albacete, Cuenca and Valencia provinces]. MSc Thesis, Polytechnical University of Valencia, Spain. http://www.chj.es/medioambiente/planificacionhidrologica/Documents/Mejora%20del%20Conocimiento/MEMORIAPFCOPH.pdf . Cited 09 November 2010Gorelick SM (eds) (1986) Conjunctive water use: understanding and managing surfacewater-groundwater interactions. IAHS publication no. 156, IAHS, Wallingford, UKHamm SY, Cheong JY, Kim HS (2005) Comparing inversion and trial-and-error methods to determine optimum yield at a riverbank filtration site, Korea. Salt Lake City Annual Meeting. Geol Soc Am Abst 37(7)1–66Harbaugh AW, Banta ER, Hill MC, McDonald MG (2000) MODFLOW-2000, The U.S. Geological Survey modular groundwater model-User guide to modularization concepts and the groundwater flow process. US Geol Surv Open-File Rep 00–92, 121 ppIGME (1980) El sistema hidrogeológico de Albacete (Mancha Oriental): sus recursos en aguas subterráneas, utilización actual y posibilidades futuras [The Albacete hydrogeological system (Mancha Oriental): groundwater resources, actual uses and future scope]. IGME, MadridIGME (2006) Modelo Matemático de flujo de la Unidad Hidrogeológica 08.29, Mancha Oriental [Mathematical modeling of flow of the hydrogeological unit 08.29, eastern Mancha]. IGME, MadridJagelke J, Barthel R (2005) Conceptualization and implementation of a regional groundwater model for the Neckar catchment in the framework of an integrated regional model. ADGEO 5:105–111Langhoff JH, Rasmussen KR, Christensen S (2006) Quantification and regionalization of groundwater–surface water interaction along an alluvial stream. J Hydrol 320:342–358Martínez-Santos P, Llamas MR, Martínez-Alfaro P (2008) Vulnerability assessment of groundwater resources: a modelling-based approach to the Mancha Occidental aquifer, Spain. Environ Modell Softw 23:1145–1162McDonald MG, Harbaugh AW (1988) A modular three-dimensional finite-difference groundwater flow model. US Geological Survey Technical Manual of Water Resources Investigation, Book 6, US Geological Survey, Reston, Va, 586 ppNemeth MS, Solo-Gabriele HM (2002) Evaluation of the use of reach transmissivity to quantify exchange between groundwater and surface water. J Hydrol 274:145–159Osman YZ, Bruen MP (2002) Modelling stream-aquifer seepage in alluvial aquifer: an improved loosing-stream package for MODFLOW. J Hydrol 264:60–86Pisinaras V, Petalas C, Tsihrintzis VA, Zagana E (2007) A groundwater flow model for water resources management in the Ismarida plain, north Greece. Environ Model Assess 12:75–89Pulido-Velazquez AM, Sahuquillo A, Ochoa-Rivera C, Pulido-Velazqueza D (2005) Modeling of stream–aquifer interaction: the embedded multireservoir model. J Hydrol 313:166–181Rodríguez LB, Cello PA, Vionnet CA (2005) Modeling stream-aquifer interactions in a shallow aquifer, Choele Choel Island, Patagonia, Argentina. Hydrogeol J 14:591–602Ruiz JM (1999) Modelo distribuido para la evaluación de recursos hídricos [Distributed model for water resource assessment]. CEDEX, Madrid, 245 ppRushton K (2007) Representation in regional models of saturated river–aquifer interaction for gaining/losing rivers. J Hydrol 334:262–281Sanz D (2005) Contribución a la caracterización geométrica de las unidades hidrogeológicas que integran el sistema de acuíferos de la Mancha oriental [Contribution to the geometrical characterization of the hydrogeological unit which forms the Mancha Oriental aquifers system]. PhD Thesis, Univ. Complutense de Madrid, SpainSanz D, Gómez-Alday JJ, Castaño S, Moratalla A, De las Heras J, Martínez Alfaro PM (2009) Hydrostratigraphic framework and hydrogeological behaviour of the Mancha Oriental System (SE Spain). Hydrogeol J 17:1375–1391Sophocleous M (2002) Interactions between groundwater and surface water: the state of the science. Hydrogeol J 10:52–67Tóth J (1970) A conceptual model of the groundwater regime and the hydrogeological environment. J Hydrol 10:164–176Trescott PC (1975) Documentation of a finite difference model for simulation of three dimensional ground-water flow. US Geol Surv Open-File Rep 75-438, 48 ppUCLM (2008) Hydrological model for estimation recharge and evapotranspiration by remote sensing and GIS. UCLM, Albacete, Spain. http://www.hidromore.es/ . Cited 12 November 2010Vázquez-Suñe E, Abarca E, Carrera J, Capino B, Gámez D, Pool M, Simó T, Batlle F, Niñerota JM, Ibáñez X (2006) Groundwater modelling as a tool for the European Water Framework Directive (WFD) application: the Llobregat case. Phys Chem Earth 31:1015–1029Winter TC (1995) Recent advances in understanding the interaction of groundwater and surface water. In: U.S. National report to International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics 19911994. Rev Geophys 33(Suppl):985–994Woessner WW (2000) Stream and fluvial plain ground water interactions: rescaling hydrogeological thought. Ground Water 38:423–429Younger PL (1995) Modelling river–aquifer interactions. In: Younger PL (ed) Proc BHS National Meeting. British Hydrological Society Occasional Paper no. 6, BHS, LondonZume J, Tarhule A (2008) Simulating the impacts of groundwater pumping on stream–aquifer dynamics in semiarid northwestern Oklahoma, USA. Hydrogeol J 16:797–81