Birth weight and atopic dermatitis: systematic review and meta-analysis

Several studies examined the relationship between birth weight and atopic diseases, but no consensus has yet been reached regarding the results.The purpose of this paper was to perform a meta-analysis of the existing studies regarding the role of birth weight in the occurrence of atopic dermatitis. We carried out an extensive search in the international databases (Pubmed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Knowledge). We selected the cross-sectional, case-control, and cohort studies which analyzed the role of birth weight in the occurrence of atopic dermatitis. We performed a meta-analysis of the selected studies, and calculated the odds ratio (OR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). We included 10 studies in the final meta-analysis, which comprised 110974 patients. Weight classification was in compliance with Pediatric Nutrition Surveillance System (PedNSS) Health Indicators. In the first meta-analysis, we selected patients with low weight (below 2500 g) and atopic dermatitis and compared them with those with normal weight (2500 – 4000 g) and atopic dermatitis. The analysis showed that low birth weight represents a protective factor in the occurrence of atopic dermatitis (OR = 0.68, CI: 0.63 – 0.75, P&lt;0.0001). In the second meta-analysis, we compared patients with high weight (over 4000 g) and atopic dermatitis with those with normal weight and atopic dermatitis. The results indicated that increased birth weight represents a risk factor for atopic dermatitis (OR = 1.1; CI: 1.02 – 1.17; P = 0.01)Thus, low birth weight represents a protective factor for the occurrence of atopic dermatitis and high birth weight represents a risk factor for the occurrence of this disease.</p

Tophaceous Gout – When the Skin Comes First

Gout represents a metabolic disorder with systemic echo, in which needle-like crystals of monosodium urate are deposited in various tissular structures. Crystals accumulation in the connective tissue (tophi) represents the late, chronic stage of this disease, usually emerging after an average of 10 years after disease onset. Herein we report three cases of patients aged 70, 33, and 53 who presented with painful subcutaneous nodules located on various body areas. All of them had hyperuricemia. Several conditions had to be investigated in order to establish the etiology of uric acid metabolism alterations. Laboratory and pathology findings established the diagnosis of gout, with tophi as the first symptom of the disease. Following patient education, diet and lifestyle changes, and medication, the outcome in all patients was favorable, with alleviation of the symptoms. Tophaceous gout as a first presentation of this disease is currently uncommon, but dermatologist should be aware of this rare finding for proper management of such cases and to prevent the resultant significant functional and quality of life impairment if not recognized early

Laser in surgical scar clearance: An update review.

AbstractScar formation is a consequence of wound healing that developed from damaged tissue either from physical injury or surgical incision. A hypertrophic scar develops due to an abnormal healing response to trauma. It might lead to serious functional and cosmetic disability. There are numerous methods mentioned in the literature to treat such scars but to date, no single method has been known to cure them. In this review, we focused on differences between various types of nonsurgical management of hypertrophic scar focusing on the indication, mechanism of action, and efficacy of the pulsed dye laser (PDL), fractional carbon dioxide laser (fCO2), Er‐YAG laser, and intense pulse light (IPL). The literature research included peer‐reviewed articles (clinical trials or scientific reviews) which were identified by searching electronic databases like PubMed till January 2021 and reference lists of respective articles. Only articles published in the English language were included

Public perception of dermatologists in Europe:Results from a population-based survey

BACKGROUND: The public perception of dermatology has been poorly investigated in Europe. OBJECTIVE: To determine the general public's perception of dermatologists in Europe. METHODS: This multinational, cross-sectional study was conducted within the framework of the EADV population-based survey on the 'Burden of skin diseases in Europe'. Data were collected using a web-based online survey on a representative sample of the general populations aged 18 years or more of 27 European countries. Proportional quota sampling with replacement design was used for each country. RESULTS: A total of 44,689 adult participants responded to the questionnaire, of whom 18,004 visited a dermatologist in the preceding 3 years. The dermatologist was the second most often visited specialist among all medical specialties, with 69.7%, 72.1%, 42.1% and 78.1% of participants in Western Europe (WE), Eastern Europe (EE), Northern Europe (NE) and Southern Europe (SE), respectively, having consulted a dermatologist over the past 24 months. Most participants across all regions agreed that the dermatologist was the first healthcare provider for chronic skin diseases (61.9% in WE, 69.8% in EE, 45.7% in NE and 60.4% in SE) and for skin cancers (65.5% in WE, 67.6% in EE, 42.4% in NE and 63.0% in SE). The five most common reasons for visiting a dermatologist among all participants were: naevi check-up or skin cancer screening (20.2%), chronic skin diseases (16.5%), acute skin diseases (12.4%), cosmetic advice or procedure (10.2%), hyperpigmentation or congenital lesions (9.1%) and hair or nail disorder (7.7%). Most participants (84.6% in WE, 82.5% in EE, 78.3% in NE and 82.8% in SE) were very swatisfied/somewhat satisfied with the service provided. CONCLUSION: Our study findings underscore the central role of dermatologists in skin health and highlights them as valued and trusted care providers across Europe. Understanding the perceived position of the dermatologist is the first step in improving health policy development and implementation. Notably, access to a dermatologist was lowest in NE, probably reflecting differences in healthcare organizational structures or possibly cultural differences in healthcare seeking behaviour.</p

The journey of patients with skin diseases from the first consultation to the diagnosis in a representative sample of the European general population from the EADV burden of skin diseases study

Background: The journey of patients with skin diseases through healthcare has been scarcely investigated. Objective: To analyse the journey of people with skin diseases in the different healthcare environment in Europe. Methods: This multinational, cross-sectional, European study was conducted on a representative sample of the adult general population of 27 European countries. The prevalence of the most frequent skin diseases was determined. Information was collected on the patient journey from the first medical consultation to the diagnosis, and the reasons for not consulting a healthcare professional. Results: On a total of 44,689 individuals, 30.3% reported to have consulted a dermatologist during the previous 2 years. Participants consulted mainly for mole control or skin cancer screening (22.3%), followed by chronic skin diseases (16.2%). The diagnoses of acne, atopic dermatitis, psoriasis and rosacea were made most frequently by a dermatologist, while fungal skin infections were diagnosed more often by a general practitioner (GP), and sexually transmitted diseases (STD) by other specialists. The diagnosis was not always definitive at the first consultation, in particular for STD. The percentage of people who did not consult a healthcare professional for their skin disease was particularly high for acne (36.4%), alopecia (44.7%) and fungal infection (30.0%). Moreover, 17.7% of respondents with psoriasis did not consult. A high percentage of participants with alopecia thought that the disease was not worrying, while patients with psoriasis often answered that they were able to manage the disease since they had already consulted a doctor. Many patients with acne (41.1%) and fungal infection (48.2%) thought that they were able to handle the disease by themselves. Conclusion: The analysis of the self-reported medical journey of patients with common skin diseases may allow to understand the unmet needs of patients, thus improving outcomes and reducing expenses.</p

Laser in surgical scar clearance : an update review

Scar formation is a consequence of wound healing that developed from damaged tissue either from physical injury or surgical incision. A hypertrophic scar develops due to an abnormal healing response to trauma. It might lead to serious functional and cosmetic disability. There are numerous methods mentioned in the literature to treat such scars but to date, no single method has been known to cure them. In this review, we focused on differences between various types of nonsurgical management of hypertrophic scar focusing on the indication, mechanism of action, and efficacy of the pulsed dye laser (PDL), fractional carbon dioxide laser (fCO2), Er-YAG laser, and intense pulse light (IPL). The literature research included peer-reviewed articles (clinical trials or scientific reviews) which were identified by searching electronic databases like PubMed till January 2021 and reference lists of respective articles. Only articles published in the English language were included

Extreme Dermatology – the Intensive Care Skills of Dermatologists in Three Case Presentations of Acute Skin Failure

Dermatological emergencies include a number of clinicalconditions usually accompanied by systemic symptoms that can leadto life-threatening complications.From the broad spectrum of life-threatening dermatoses, three casesare presented: a case of febrile ulceronecrotic Mucha-Habermann disease(FUMHD), a case of pemphigus vulgaris mimicking Stevens-Johnsonsyndrome (SJS), and a case of toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN).Those cases were considered extreme, and presented to illustrate thepositive outcome of timely intensive dermatological care.An interdisciplinary approach is essential in the diagnosis, treatment,management, and follow up of patients with life-threatening dermatoses

The prevalence of skin diseases in Greece, impact on quality of life and stigmatization:A population-based survey study

Background: There is no population-based evidence on the prevalence and impact of skin diseases in Greece. Objectives: To describe the prevalence of 12 main skin diseases and their impact on quality of life (QoL) and feelings of stigmatization in the Greek population. Methods: A population-based survey in an adult Greek representative sample was carried out as part of the multinational ‘EADV burden of skin diseases study’. Quality of life (QOL) was measured using the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) from the EuroQol-5D (EQ. 5D) questionnaires. Results: In 1010 participants, 47.8% (n = 483) declared at least one skin disease or condition or skin-related unpleasant sensation in the last 12 months. Fungal skin infection was reported with the higher prevalence (7.5%), followed by alopecia (5.7%), atopic dermatitis (5%), acne (3.6%), sexually transmitted diseases (2.7%), psoriasis (2.2%) chronic urticaria (1.5%), rosacea (1.3%), nonmelanoma skin cancer (1.5%), vitiligo (0.6%), cutaneous melanoma (0.6%) and hidradenitis suppurativa (0.3%). Mean VAS-EQ. 5D and DLQI scores were 77.8 and 2.2, respectively. Among those reporting at least one skin problem, 68.1% reported an impact of the skin condition on their personal life and 51% reported an impact on time to take care of themselves. Regarding the impact on work-life decisions, 22.2% reoriented their professional activity, 13% were refused a professional offer, 22.2% did not get the job they hoped to and 16.7% chose their work with their skin problem in mind. Regarding feelings of stigmatization, 12% felt left out/rejected by others, 6.6% were refused access to leisure facilities and 9.8% reported the impression to be looked at with disgust. Conclusions: Our population-based study provides new information on the prevalence of skin diseases in the Southern European country of Greece and highlights the impact of prevalent skin disease on life-altering decisions and stigmatization.</p

The prevalence of skin diseases in Greece, impact on quality of life and stigmatization:A population-based survey study

Background: There is no population-based evidence on the prevalence and impact of skin diseases in Greece. Objectives: To describe the prevalence of 12 main skin diseases and their impact on quality of life (QoL) and feelings of stigmatization in the Greek population. Methods: A population-based survey in an adult Greek representative sample was carried out as part of the multinational ‘EADV burden of skin diseases study’. Quality of life (QOL) was measured using the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) from the EuroQol-5D (EQ. 5D) questionnaires. Results: In 1010 participants, 47.8% (n = 483) declared at least one skin disease or condition or skin-related unpleasant sensation in the last 12 months. Fungal skin infection was reported with the higher prevalence (7.5%), followed by alopecia (5.7%), atopic dermatitis (5%), acne (3.6%), sexually transmitted diseases (2.7%), psoriasis (2.2%) chronic urticaria (1.5%), rosacea (1.3%), nonmelanoma skin cancer (1.5%), vitiligo (0.6%), cutaneous melanoma (0.6%) and hidradenitis suppurativa (0.3%). Mean VAS-EQ. 5D and DLQI scores were 77.8 and 2.2, respectively. Among those reporting at least one skin problem, 68.1% reported an impact of the skin condition on their personal life and 51% reported an impact on time to take care of themselves. Regarding the impact on work-life decisions, 22.2% reoriented their professional activity, 13% were refused a professional offer, 22.2% did not get the job they hoped to and 16.7% chose their work with their skin problem in mind. Regarding feelings of stigmatization, 12% felt left out/rejected by others, 6.6% were refused access to leisure facilities and 9.8% reported the impression to be looked at with disgust. Conclusions: Our population-based study provides new information on the prevalence of skin diseases in the Southern European country of Greece and highlights the impact of prevalent skin disease on life-altering decisions and stigmatization.</p