sj-docx-1-cdp-10.1177_09637214231183917 – Supplemental material for The Use of Ontologies to Accelerate the Behavioral Sciences: Promises and Challenges

Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-cdp-10.1177_09637214231183917 for The Use of Ontologies to Accelerate the Behavioral Sciences: Promises and Challenges by Carla Sharp, Robert M. Kaplan and Timothy J. Strauman in Current Directions in Psychological Science</p

Descriptive statistics of dependent variables by group of behavioral inhibition (BI).

<p>Descriptive statistics of dependent variables by group of behavioral inhibition (BI).</p

Table_1_Considerations in cultural adaptation of parent–child interventions for African American mothers and children exposed to intimate partner violence.docx

African American women are at disproportionate risk of experiencing intimate partner violence (IPV) and consistently report more severe and recurrent IPV victimization in comparison to their White and Hispanic counterparts. IPV is more likely to occur in families with children than in couples without children. Parenting in the wake of IPV is a challenging reality faced by many African American women in the United States. Despite the urgent need to support mothers who have survived IPV, there is currently no culturally adapted parenting intervention for African American mothers following exposure to IPV. The aim of this review is to summarize and integrate two disparate literatures, hitherto unintegrated; namely the literature base on parenting interventions for women and children exposed to IPV and the literature base on parenting interventions through the lens of African American racial and cultural factors. Our review identified 7 questions that researchers may consider in adapting IPV parenting interventions for African American women and children. These questions are discussed as a possible roadmap for the adaptation of more culturally sensitive IPV parenting programs.</p

Descriptive statistics of dependent variables by group of behavioral inhibition (BI).

<p>Descriptive statistics of dependent variables by group of behavioral inhibition (BI).</p

Multiple lineal regressions comparing levels of mentalizing among groups with different levels of BI.

<p>Multiple lineal regressions comparing levels of mentalizing among groups with different levels of BI.</p

Standardized Factor Loadings for the PTSD Dysphoria Model.

<p><i>Note</i>. All factor loadings are significant at <i>p</i> < 0.001 level.</p><p>Standardized Factor Loadings for the PTSD Dysphoria Model.</p

Factor Correlations for the Combined Dysphoria Model of PTSD and Four-Factor Rumination Model.

<p><i>Note</i>. All factor correlations are significant at <i>p</i> < 0.001 level.</p><p>Factor Correlations for the Combined Dysphoria Model of PTSD and Four-Factor Rumination Model.</p

Item Mapping for PTSD Models.

<p><i>Note</i>: R = Reexperiencing, A = Avoidance, N = Numbing, H = Hyperarousal, D = Dysphoria, DA = Dysphoric Arousal, AA = Anxious Arousal</p><p>Item Mapping for PTSD Models.</p

Factor Correlations for the Four-Factor Rumination Model.

<p><i>Note</i>. All factor correlations are significant at <i>p</i> < 0.001 level.</p><p>Factor Correlations for the Four-Factor Rumination Model.</p

Correlations between the Four-Factor Rumination Model and PTSD’s Dysphoria Factor, and the Corresponding Wald Test Values.

<p><i>Note</i>. PFT = Problem-Focused Thinking from RTSQ. CT = Counterfactual Thinking from RTSQ. RT = Repetitive Thinking from RTSQ. AT = Anticipatory Thinking from RTSQ.</p><p>RE = PTSD’s Reexperiencing DYS = PTSD’s Dysphoria.</p><p>*<i>p</i> < 0.05.</p><p>**<i>p</i> < 0.01.</p><p>Correlations between the Four-Factor Rumination Model and PTSD’s Dysphoria Factor, and the Corresponding Wald Test Values.</p