10 research outputs found

    Should Gonyaulax hyalina and Gonyaulax fragilis (Dinophyceae) remain two different taxa?

    No full text
    Escalera et al. (2018. Phycologia 57: 453–464) concluded that Gonyaulax hyalina and G. fragilis were the same species. Here, the morphologies of G. hyalina and G. fragilis were restudied in field samples from different parts of the World Ocean. Results showed that Escalera et al. did not observe G. fragilis, as all strains used in their study belong to one species, G. hyalina. In consequence, it is hereby proposed that the two taxa remain as separate species until further genetic studies are carried out. Additionally, the interpretation of the anterior sulcal plate as unique within gonyaulacoids is considered here inaccurate, as the plate pattern of both species is similar to other species of Gonyaulax, e.g. G. polygramma. We also show that both species may co-occur in the same sample. Their observation of an anterior intercalary plate in cultures of G. hyalina was confirmed in field samples

    Reply to: Comments on Mertens et al. (2022): the taxonomic identity of Micracanthodinium setiferum (Lohmann) Deflandre (Dinophyceae incertae sedis) remains elusive, and its epitypification is not achieved

    No full text
    We here epitypify Micracanthodinium setiferum by selecting a previously published micrograph from the Ionian Sea, and we typify both formae. We also clarify several points that were raised by our critics

    Morpho-molecular and spectroscopic characterization of the freshwater dinoflagellate Unruhdinium penardii var. robustum (Kryptoperidiniaceae, Peridiniales), blooming in the Loir River, France

    No full text
    A freshwater dinoflagellate formed extensive red tides in the Loir River, France in September 2018. Morphological observations using light microscopy and field emission scanning electron microscopy identified the causative organism as the "dinotom" Unruhdinium penardii var. robustum, with a tabulation of Po, x, 4', 0a, 6 '', 5c (or t+4c), 5s, 5 ''', 2 ''''. The thecal plate overlap of the variety is documented for the first time. Division cysts were also observed in the plankton assemblage. Sequences obtained from the vegetative cells of small subunit (SSU) and large subunit (LSU) ribosomal DNA (rDNA) are identical to previously published sequences from Japan. This is the first unambiguous identification from French waters of this species and its variety. A SSU rDNA sequence is also reported for the diatom endosymbiont, which is close to the diatom genus Discostella. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopic analysis showed that division cysts and thecae of U. penardii var. robustum are cellulose-like, but with a higher degree of cross-linking than in microcrystalline cellulose and with a more complex macromolecular buildup

    Reclassification of Gonyaulax verior (Gonyaulacales, Dinophyceae) as Sourniaea diacantha gen. et comb. nov.

    No full text
    Gonyaulax verior was initially described as Amylax diacantha from Belgian coastal waters a century ago but its detailed morphology needed restudy. Here, we established nine strains of G. verior by germinating cysts or isolating cells from localities from the European Atlantic to the Caspian Sea and the Pacific Ocean. Both cyst and thecal morphology were examined by light and scanning electron microscopy. SSU, LSU and/or ITS-5.8S rRNA gene sequences were obtained from all strains. Cells of G. verior have a plate formula of Po, 4′, 2a, 6-7′′, 6C, 6S, 6′′′, 1p, 1′′′′ with an L-type ventral organisation, characterised by two either straight or curved antapical horns of variable length. Cysts of G. verior are oval, smooth and contain one or two yellow accumulation bodies. The maximum-likelihood and Bayesian inference analyses based on SSU and LSU rRNA gene sequences revealed two clades of G. verior, referred to as ribotypes A and B. Genetic distances based on ITS-5.8S rRNA gene sequences within the same ribotype were less than 0.06, but greater than 0.32 between ribotypes. G. verior is reclassified as Sourniaea diacantha gen. et comb. nov., which is attributed to Lingulodiniaceae together with Pyxidinopsis, Lingulodinium and Amylax. Our results suggest that Lingulodiniaceae can be separated from Protoceratiaceae and Gonyaulacaceae based on ventral organisation, apical complex, ventral pore and number of anterior intercalary plates. One strain of S. diacantha was examined for yessotoxin production by LC-MS/MS but did not produce toxin

    Morphological and phylogenetic data do not support the split of <i>Alexandrium</i> into four genera

    No full text
    8 pages, 2 tablesA recently published study analyzed the phylogenetic relationship between the genera Centrodinium and Alexandrium, confirming an earlier publication showing the genus Alexandrium as paraphyletic. This most recent manuscript retained the genus Alexandrium, introduced a new genus Episemicolon, resurrected two genera, Gessnerium and Protogonyaulax, and stated that: “The polyphyly [sic] of Alexandrium is solved with the split into four genera”. However, these reintroduced taxa were not based on monophyletic groups. Therefore this work, if accepted, would result in replacing a single paraphyletic taxon with several non-monophyletic ones. The morphological data presented for genus characterization also do not convincingly support taxa delimitations. The combination of weak molecular phylogenetics and the lack of diagnostic traits (i.e., autapomorphies) render the applicability of the concept of limited use. The proposal to split the genus Alexandrium on the basis of our current knowledge is rejected herein. The aim here is not to present an alternative analysis and revision, but to maintain Alexandrium. A better constructed and more phylogenetically accurate revision can and should wait until more complete evidence becomes available and there is a strong reason to revise the genus Alexandrium. The reasons are explained in detail by a review of the available molecular and morphological data for species of the genera Alexandrium and Centrodinium. In addition, cyst morphology and chemotaxonomy are discussed, and the need for integrative taxonomy is highlightedSupport to DMA from the NOAA ECOHAB program (Grant #NA15NOS4780181) is gratefully acknowledged. Support to EG, AR, NS from the COPAs project (CTM2017-86121-R) is acknowledged. IGL and CJBS are COFFA-IPN and EDI-IPN fellowsWith the funding support of the ‘Severo Ochoa Centre of Excellence’ accreditation (CEX2019-000928-S), of the Spanish Research Agency (AEI)Peer reviewe

    A second update on mapping the human genetic architecture of COVID-19

    Get PDF
    corecore