90 research outputs found

    Galaxy clusters

    Get PDF

    The relation between mass and concentration in X-ray galaxy clusters at high redshift

    Get PDF
    Galaxy clusters are the most recent, gravitationally-bound products of the hierarchical mass accretion over cosmological scales. How the mass is concentrated is predicted to correlate with the total mass in the cluster's halo, with systems at higher mass being less concentrated at given redshift and for any given mass, systems with lower concentration are found at higher redshifts. Through a spatial and spectral X-ray analysis, we reconstruct the total mass profile of 47 galaxy clusters observed with Chandra in the redshift range 0.4<z<1.20.4<z<1.2, selected to have no major mergers, to investigate the relation between the mass and the dark matter concentration, and the evolution of this relation with redshift. The sample in exam is the largest one investigated so far at z>0.4z>0.4, and is well suited to provide the first constraint on the concentration--mass relation at z>0.7z>0.7 from X-ray analysis. Under the assumptions that the distribution of the X-ray emitting gas is spherically symmetric and in hydrostatic equilibrium, we combine the deprojected gas density and spectral temperature profiles through the hydrostatic equilibrium equation to recover the parameters that describe a NFW total mass distribution. The comparison with results from weak lensing analysis reveals a very good agreement both for masses and concentrations. Uncertainties are however too large to make any robust conclusion on the hydrostatic bias of these systems. The relation is well described by the form cMB(1+z)Cc \propto M^B (1+z)^C, with B=0.50±0.20B=-0.50 \pm 0.20, C=0.12±0.61C=0.12 \pm 0.61 (at 68.3\% confidence), it is slightly steeper than the one predicted by numerical simulations (B0.1B\sim-0.1) and does not show any evident redshift evolution. We obtain the first constraints on the properties of the concentration--mass relation at z>0.7z > 0.7 from X-ray data, showing a reasonable good agreement with recent numerical predictions.Comment: A&A accepted, 18 pages, 13 figures, 1 Appendi

    Galaxy clusters

    Get PDF

    Impact of Weak Lensing Mass Calibration on eROSITA Galaxy Cluster Cosmological Studies -- a Forecast

    Full text link
    We forecast the impact of weak lensing (WL) cluster mass calibration on the cosmological constraints from the X-ray selected galaxy cluster counts in the upcoming eROSITA survey. We employ a prototype cosmology pipeline to analyze mock cluster catalogs. Each cluster is sampled from the mass function in a fiducial cosmology and given an eROSITA count rate and redshift, where count rates are modeled using the eROSITA effective area, a typical exposure time, Poisson noise and the scatter and form of the observed X-ray luminosity-- and temperature--mass--redshift relations. A subset of clusters have mock shear profiles to mimic either those from DES and HSC or from the future Euclid and LSST surveys. Using a count rate selection, we generate a baseline cluster cosmology catalog that contains 13k clusters over 14,892~deg2^2 of extragalactic sky. Low mass groups are excluded using raised count rate thresholds at low redshift. Forecast parameter uncertainties for ΩM\Omega_\mathrm{M}, σ8\sigma_8 and ww are 0.023 (0.016; 0.014), 0.017 (0.012; 0.010), and 0.085 (0.074; 0.071), respectively, when adopting DES+HSC WL (Euclid; LSST), while marginalizing over the sum of the neutrino masses. A degeneracy between the distance--redshift relation and the parameters of the observable--mass scaling relation limits the impact of the WL calibration on the ww constraints, but with BAO measurements from DESI an improved determination of ww to 0.043 becomes possible. With Planck CMB priors, ΩM\Omega_\text{M} (σ8\sigma_8) can be determined to 0.0050.005 (0.0070.007), and the summed neutrino mass limited to mν<0.241\sum m_\nu < 0.241 eV (at 95\%). If systematics on the group mass scale can be controlled, the eROSITA group and cluster sample with 43k objects and LSST WL could constrain ΩM\Omega_\mathrm{M} and σ8\sigma_8 to 0.007 and ww to 0.050.Comment: 28 pages, 13 figur

    Duplication of the posterior cerebral artery: two case reports

    Get PDF
    The anatomy of the brain circulation is complex and variable.Autopsy studies and imaging techniques have detected anatomical variations of cerebral arteries (CAs) in 48–58% of the general population [1]. The duplication of the posterior cerebral artery (PCA) is a rare anatomic variant with a frequency of 2.3% [2, 3]. PCA duplication is characterised by the identification of a “true foetal” PCA, that originates from the internal carotid artery (ICA) and gives rise to the parieto-occipital artery, the internal occipital artery, the calcarine artery and the posterior pericallosal artery, associated with a PCA, that regularly arises from the basilar artery and gives rise to the posterior temporal artery [4]

    Qualitative versus automatic evaluation of CT perfusion parameters in acute posterior circulation ischaemic stroke

    Get PDF
    Purpose To compare the diagnostic accuracy (ACC) in the detection of acute posterior circulation strokes between qualitative evaluation of software-generated colour maps and automatic assessment of CT perfusion (CTP) parameters. Methods Were retrospectively collected 50 patients suspected of acute posterior circulation stroke who underwent to CTP (GE “Lightspeed”, 64 slices) within 24 h after symptom onset between January 2016 and December 2018. The Posterior circulation-Acute Stroke Prognosis Early CT Score (pc-ASPECTS) was used for quantifying the extent of ischaemic areas on non-contrast (NC)CT and colour-coded maps generated by CTP4 (GE) and RAPID (iSchemia View) software. Final pc-ASPECTS was calculated on follow-up NCCT and/or MRI (Philips Intera 3.0 T or Philips Achieva Ingenia 1.5 T). RAPID software also elaborated automatic quantitative mismatch maps. Results By qualitative evaluation of colour-coded maps, MTT-CTP4D and Tmax-RAPID showed the highest sensitivity (SE) (88.6% and 90.9%, respectively) and ACC (84% and 88%, respectively) compared with the other perfusion parameters (CBV, CBF). Baseline NCCT and CBF provided by RAPID quantitative perfusion mismatchmaps had the lowest SE (29.6%and 6.8%, respectively) and ACC (38% and 18%, respectively). CBF and Tmax assessment provided by quantitative RAPID perfusion mismatch maps showed significant lower SE and ACC than qualitative evaluation. No significant differences were found between the pc-ASPECTSs assessed on colour-coded MTT and Tmax maps neither between the scores assessed on colourcoded CBV-CTP4D and CBF-RAPID maps. Conclusion Qualitative analysis of colour-codedmaps resultedmore sensitive and accurate in the detection of ischaemic changes than automatic quantitative analysis

    Velocity Segregation and Systematic Biases In Velocity Dispersion Estimates With the SPT-GMOS Spectroscopic Survey

    Get PDF
    The velocity distribution of galaxies in clusters is not universal; rather, galaxies are segregated according to their spectral type and relative luminosity. We examine the velocity distributions of different populations of galaxies within 89 Sunyaev Zel'dovich (SZ) selected galaxy clusters spanning 0.28<z<1.08 0.28 < z < 1.08. Our sample is primarily draw from the SPT-GMOS spectroscopic survey, supplemented by additional published spectroscopy, resulting in a final spectroscopic sample of 4148 galaxy spectra---2868 cluster members. The velocity dispersion of star-forming cluster galaxies is 17±417\pm4% greater than that of passive cluster galaxies, and the velocity dispersion of bright (m<m0.5m < m^{*}-0.5) cluster galaxies is 11±411\pm4% lower than the velocity dispersion of our total member population. We find good agreement with simulations regarding the shape of the relationship between the measured velocity dispersion and the fraction of passive vs. star-forming galaxies used to measure it, but we find a small offset between this relationship as measured in data and simulations in which suggests that our dispersions are systematically low by as much as 3\% relative to simulations. We argue that this offset could be interpreted as a measurement of the effective velocity bias that describes the ratio of our observed velocity dispersions and the intrinsic velocity dispersion of dark matter particles in a published simulation result. Measuring velocity bias in this way suggests that large spectroscopic surveys can improve dispersion-based mass-observable scaling relations for cosmology even in the face of velocity biases, by quantifying and ultimately calibrating them out.Comment: Accepted to ApJ; 21 pages, 11 figures, 5 table
    corecore