23 research outputs found
Roses Have Thorns: Understanding the Downside of Oncological Care Delivery Through Visual Analytics and Sequential Rule Mining
Personalized head and neck cancer therapeutics have greatly improved survival
rates for patients, but are often leading to understudied long-lasting symptoms
which affect quality of life. Sequential rule mining (SRM) is a promising
unsupervised machine learning method for predicting longitudinal patterns in
temporal data which, however, can output many repetitive patterns that are
difficult to interpret without the assistance of visual analytics. We present a
data-driven, human-machine analysis visual system developed in collaboration
with SRM model builders in cancer symptom research, which facilitates
mechanistic knowledge discovery in large scale, multivariate cohort symptom
data. Our system supports multivariate predictive modeling of post-treatment
symptoms based on during-treatment symptoms. It supports this goal through an
SRM, clustering, and aggregation back end, and a custom front end to help
develop and tune the predictive models. The system also explains the resulting
predictions in the context of therapeutic decisions typical in personalized
care delivery. We evaluate the resulting models and system with an
interdisciplinary group of modelers and head and neck oncology researchers. The
results demonstrate that our system effectively supports clinical and symptom
research
Cohort-based T-SSIM Visual Computing for Radiation Therapy Prediction and Exploration
We describe a visual computing approach to radiation therapy (RT) planning,
based on spatial similarity within a patient cohort. In radiotherapy for head
and neck cancer treatment, dosage to organs at risk surrounding a tumor is a
large cause of treatment toxicity. Along with the availability of patient
repositories, this situation has lead to clinician interest in understanding
and predicting RT outcomes based on previously treated similar patients. To
enable this type of analysis, we introduce a novel topology-based spatial
similarity measure, T-SSIM, and a predictive algorithm based on this similarity
measure. We couple the algorithm with a visual steering interface that
intertwines visual encodings for the spatial data and statistical results,
including a novel parallel-marker encoding that is spatially aware. We report
quantitative results on a cohort of 165 patients, as well as a qualitative
evaluation with domain experts in radiation oncology, data management,
biostatistics, and medical imaging, who are collaborating remotely.Comment: IEEE VIS (SciVis) 201
DASS Good: Explainable Data Mining of Spatial Cohort Data
Developing applicable clinical machine learning models is a difficult task
when the data includes spatial information, for example, radiation dose
distributions across adjacent organs at risk. We describe the co-design of a
modeling system, DASS, to support the hybrid human-machine development and
validation of predictive models for estimating long-term toxicities related to
radiotherapy doses in head and neck cancer patients. Developed in collaboration
with domain experts in oncology and data mining, DASS incorporates
human-in-the-loop visual steering, spatial data, and explainable AI to augment
domain knowledge with automatic data mining. We demonstrate DASS with the
development of two practical clinical stratification models and report feedback
from domain experts. Finally, we describe the design lessons learned from this
collaborative experience.Comment: 10 pages, 9 figure
Multi-organ spatial stratification of 3-D dose distributions improves risk prediction of long-term self-reported severe symptoms in oropharyngeal cancer patients receiving radiotherapy:development of a pre-treatment decision support tool
PURPOSE: Identify Oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) patients at high-risk of developing long-term severe radiation-associated symptoms using dose volume histograms for organs-at-risk, via unsupervised clustering.MATERIAL AND METHODS: All patients were treated using radiation therapy for OPC. Dose-volume histograms of organs-at-risk were extracted from patients' treatment plans. Symptom ratings were collected via the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI) given weekly during, and 6 months post-treatment. Drymouth, trouble swallowing, mucus, and vocal dysfunction were selected for analysis in this study. Patient stratifications were obtained by applying Bayesian Mixture Models with three components to patient's dose histograms for relevant organs. The clusters with the highest total mean doses were translated into dose thresholds using rule mining. Patient stratifications were compared against Tumor staging information using multivariate likelihood ratio tests. Model performance for prediction of moderate/severe symptoms at 6 months was compared against normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models using cross-validation.RESULTS: A total of 349 patients were included for long-term symptom prediction. High-risk clusters were significantly correlated with outcomes for severe late drymouth (p <.0001, OR = 2.94), swallow (p = .002, OR = 5.13), mucus (p = .001, OR = 3.18), and voice (p = .009, OR = 8.99). Simplified clusters were also correlated with late severe symptoms for drymouth (p <.001, OR = 2.77), swallow (p = .01, OR = 3.63), mucus (p = .01, OR = 2.37), and voice (p <.001, OR = 19.75). Proposed cluster stratifications show better performance than NTCP models for severe drymouth (AUC.598 vs.559, MCC.143 vs.062), swallow (AUC.631 vs.561, MCC.20 vs -.030), mucus (AUC.596 vs.492, MCC.164 vs -.041), and voice (AUC.681 vs.555, MCC.181 vs -.019). Simplified dose thresholds also show better performance than baseline models for predicting late severe ratings for all symptoms.CONCLUSION: Our results show that leveraging the 3-D dose histograms from radiation therapy plan improves stratification of patients according to their risk of experiencing long-term severe radiation associated symptoms, beyond existing NTPC models. Our rule-based method can approximate our stratifications with minimal loss of accuracy and can proactively identify risk factors for radiation-associated toxicity.</p
International lower limb collaborative (INTELLECT) study: a multicentre, international retrospective audit of lower extremity open fractures
Trauma remains a major cause of mortality and disability across the world1, with a higher burden in developing nations2. Open lower extremity injuries are devastating events from a physical3, mental health4, and socioeconomic5 standpoint. The potential sequelae, including risk of chronic infection and amputation, can lead to delayed recovery and major disability6. This international study aimed to describe global disparities, timely intervention, guideline-directed care, and economic aspects of open lower limb injuries
Machine Learning Applications in Head and Neck Radiation Oncology: Lessons From Open-Source Radiomics Challenges
Radiomics leverages existing image datasets to provide non-visible data extraction via image post-processing, with the aim of identifying prognostic, and predictive imaging features at a sub-region of interest level. However, the application of radiomics is hampered by several challenges such as lack of image acquisition/analysis method standardization, impeding generalizability. As of yet, radiomics remains intriguing, but not clinically validated. We aimed to test the feasibility of a non-custom-constructed platform for disseminating existing large, standardized databases across institutions for promoting radiomics studies. Hence, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center organized two public radiomics challenges in head and neck radiation oncology domain. This was done in conjunction with MICCAI 2016 satellite symposium using Kaggle-in-Class, a machine-learning and predictive analytics platform. We drew on clinical data matched to radiomics data derived from diagnostic contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) images in a dataset of 315 patients with oropharyngeal cancer. Contestants were tasked to develop models for (i) classifying patients according to their human papillomavirus status, or (ii) predicting local tumor recurrence, following radiotherapy. Data were split into training, and test sets. Seventeen teams from various professional domains participated in one or both of the challenges. This review paper was based on the contestants' feedback; provided by 8 contestants only (47%). Six contestants (75%) incorporated extracted radiomics features into their predictive model building, either alone (n = 5; 62.5%), as was the case with the winner of the “HPV” challenge, or in conjunction with matched clinical attributes (n = 2; 25%). Only 23% of contestants, notably, including the winner of the “local recurrence” challenge, built their model relying solely on clinical data. In addition to the value of the integration of machine learning into clinical decision-making, our experience sheds light on challenges in sharing and directing existing datasets toward clinical applications of radiomics, including hyper-dimensionality of the clinical/imaging data attributes. Our experience may help guide researchers to create a framework for sharing and reuse of already published data that we believe will ultimately accelerate the pace of clinical applications of radiomics; both in challenge or clinical settings