Histopatología del osteosarcoma

El diagnóstico del osteosarcoma plantea una serie de problemas específicos. De hecho, se debe tener en cuenta la existencia de diversas variantes, con pronósticos diferentes y que requieren enfoques terapéuticos igualmente distintos. En este mismo sentido, la introducción de nuevos protocolos terapéuticos, incluyendo la quimioterapia preoperatoria, requiere una evaluación histopatológica cuidadosa del especimen a fin de cuantificar la necrosis inducida por la quimioterapia y los márgenes quirúrgicos. El presente estudio analiza las diferentes variantes histopatológicas y los problemas que se relacionan con la evaluación de los efectos de la quimioterapia preoperatoria sobre el especimen resecado.Diagnosis of osteosarcoma presents specific problems. In fact, several and different varieties, presenting different prognosis and requiring different treatments, have to be recognized. Moreover, the adoption of new therapeutic protocols including preoperative chemotherapy, requires a careful histopathological evaluation of the specimen to quantify the chemotherapy-induced necrosis and the surgical margins. This paper analyzes the different histopathological varieties and problems related to the evaluation of the effects on the resected specimen of preoperative chemotherapy

Mario Campanacci, 1932-1999

This history page in the series "Leaders in Musculoskeletal Radiology" is dedicated to the memory and achievements of the Italian scientist Mario Campanacci, whose name is connected to the medical eponym Jaffe-Campanacci syndrome and to the field and progress of musculoskeletal oncology

A new computerized tomography classification to evaluate response to Denosumab in giant cell tumors in the extremities

Objectives: The aim of this study was to describe the cohort of patients who have been treated with Denosumab as neoadjuvant therapy prior to surgery for aggressive giant cell tumor of bone in the extremities, to evaluate the radiological responses to Denosumab comparing Choi criteria and a newly described computerized tomography (CT) classification, and to evaluate the risk of local recurrence after intralesional curettage or radical excision. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 36 patients (20 females and 16 males; mean age at diagnosis 36 years (range, 18\u201364)) treated with neoadjuvant Denosumab therapy prior to surgery for aggressive giant cell tumor of bone in the extremities. The radiological responses to Denosumab treatment were analyzed on the preoperative images after the neoadjuvant course with the Choi criteria and with a newly proposed classification based on CT. All these images were independently reviewed by two of the researchers. Surgical intervention methods were noted and local recurrence rates were evaluated. The correlation between radiological response amount and local recurrence were analyzed for both Choi criteria and the new CT classification. Results: Denosumab was administered for a mean of 21 weeks (range 7\u2013133). Five patients also had a short postoperative course. According to Choi criteria there was a radiological response in 32 patients (89%), while the new CT classification identified responses in all the 36 patients (100%). The identification of changes after 7 weeks of treatment was higher using the CT classification compared to Choi criteria (p = 0.043 vs p = 0.462). The surgical interventions after Denosumab comprised curettage in 29 patients (74%) and resection in 7 (26%). Local recurrence was higher in patients managed with intralesional curettage than in those treated with en bloc resection (55.1% vs 0%, p < 0.001). At last follow up 19 patients (53%) required en bloc resections. Good responders to Denosumab (type 2C) had lower risk of local recurrence (p = 0.047) after either resection or curettage. Conclusion: The new CT classification evaluated more accurately the response to Denosumab. Our experience suggests that the requirement for radical bone resection remains high despite the use of Denosumab. Level of evidence: Level IV, Therapeutic Study

What was the survival of megaprostheses in lower limb reconstructions after tumor resections?

Analisi retrospettiva delle ricostruzioni dell'arto inferiore con protesi modulariBackground: Prosthetic replacement is the most commonly used option for reconstruction of osteoarticular bone loss resulting from bone neoplasm resection or prosthetic failure. Starting in late 2001, we began exclusively using a single system for large-segment osteoarticular reconstruction after tumor resection; to our knowledge, there are no published series from one center evaluating the use of this implant. Questions/purposes: We investigated the following issues: (1) What is the overall survival, excluding local tumor recurrence, for these endoprostheses used for tumor reconstructions of the lower extremities (knee and hip)? (2) What types of failure were observed in these reconstructions? (3) Do the survival and complications vary according to site of implant? Methods: Between September 2001 and March 2012, we exclusively used this implant for tumor reconstructions. During that time, 278 patients underwent tumor reconstructions of the hip or knee, of whom 200 (72%) were available at a minimum 2 years followup. Seventy-eight patients were excluded from the study for insufficient followup as a result of early death (42) or loss at followup (36). The reconstruction types were the following: proximal femur (69 cases), distal femur (87), proximal tibia (32), and total knee (12). Failures were classified according to the Henderson classification. Nine patients among those with followup shorter than 2 years had presented one or more failures and they were included in our analysis but separately evaluated. Results: Overall survival (no further surgical procedures of any type after primary surgery), excluding Type 5 failure (tumor recurrence), was 75.9% at 5 years and 66.2% at 10 years. Seventy-one failures occurred in 58 implants (29%). Mechanical failures accounted for 59.2% and nonmechanical failures for 40.8%. The first causes of failure of the implants were the result of soft tissue failure in 6%, aseptic loosening in 3%, structural failure in 7%, infection in 8.5%, and tumor recurrence in 4.5% of the whole series. Nine implants sustained two or more failures. Overall incidence of infection was 9.5%. No statistically significant differences were observed according to anatomical site. Conclusions: Like in the case with many such complex oncologic reconstructions, the failure rate at short- to midterm in this group was over 20%. Comparative trials are called for to ascertain whether one implant is superior to another. Infection and structural failure were the most frequent modes of failure in our experience. Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence

Risks and benefits of combining denosumab and surgery in giant cell tumor of bone-a case series

BACKGROUND The RANK ligand inhibitor denosumab is being investigated for treatment of giant cell tumor of bone, but the available data in the literature remains sparse and controversial. This study analyzes the results of combining denosumab with surgical treatment and highlights possible changes for the oncologic surgeon in daily practice. METHODS A total of 91 patients were treated surgically for giant cell tumor of bone between 2010 and 2014 in an institution, whereas 25 patients of the total additionally received denosumab and were part of this study. The average age of the patients was 35 years. Eleven patients received denosumab pre- and postoperatively, whereas with 14 patients, the denosumab treatment was applied either before (7 patients) or after (7 patients) the surgery. The average preoperative therapy duration was 3.9 months and the postoperative therapy 6 months by default. RESULTS Sixteen patients presented a large tumor extension necessitating a resection of the involved bone or joint. In 10 of these patients, the indication for a resection procedure was abandoned due to the preoperative denosumab treatment and a curettage was performed. In the remaining six cases, the surgical indication was not changed despite the denosumab treatment, and two of them needed a joint replacement after the tumor resection. Also with patients treated with curettage, denosumab seems to facilitate the procedure as a new peripheral bone rim around the tumor was built, though a histologic analysis reveals viable tumor cells persisting in the denosumab-induced bone formation. After an average follow-up of 23 months, one histologically proven local recurrence occurred, necessitating a second curettage. A second patient showed a lesion in the postoperative imaging highly suspicious for local relapse which remained stable under further denosumab treatment. No adverse effect of the denosumab medication was observed in this study. CONCLUSIONS Denosumab can be a help to the oncologic surgeon by reconstituting a peripheral rim and switching the stage from aggressive to active or latent disease. But as tumor cells remain in the new-formed bone, the surgical technique of curettage has to be changed from gentle to more aggressive to avoid higher local recurrence rates

Latissimus dorsi rotational flap combined with a custom-made scapular prosthesis after oncological surgical resection: A report of two patients

BACKGROUND: Sarcomas that arise from the scapula or periscapular soft tissues often require a total scapulectomy. This often implies a large complex tissue defect that needs adequate reconstruction of both bone and soft tissue. Although various methods have been developed, no optimal procedure has emerged. Postoperative complications are common and functional recovery is not always satisfactory. This study aims to present a new surgical technique that combines a custom-made scapular prosthesis with a functional latissimus dorsi flap. CASE PRESENTATION: Two patients diagnosed with malignant tumour of the scapular region were surgically treated after proper multidisciplinary evaluation. The first patient underwent the procedure as a first surgery, the second as revision surgery. The new technique comprises three surgical stages: excisional surgery with soft tissue resection and scapulectomy, bone reconstruction with custom-made prosthesis, and soft tissue reconstruction using a latissimus dorsi rotational flap overturned on the prosthesis. The goal is to set up a new functional unit combining an anatomically shaped implant (manufactured using latest three-dimensional printing technology) and a muscular flap, and to maintain the neurovascular supply. The patients were followed up to evaluate functional outcome and complications. Both patients were alive with no evidence of disease. Functional results were satisfactory and the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society scores were 87% and 63%, respectively. No surgical complications such as implant breakage, joint collapse, wound dehiscence, or infection were observed. CONCLUSIONS: This new technique upgrades the role of the latissimus dorsi flap to a functional tool in combination with an anatomical, three-dimensionally printed, custom-made prosthesis, and provides adequate well-vascularized and healthy tissue to maximize the likelihood of successful limb salvage

Biological Prosthesis (Hollow 3D-Printed Titanium Custom-Made Prosthesis and Bone Graft) for Humeral Reconstruction in Pediatric Oncologic Patients: Surgical Indications and Results

This study presents the mid-term outcomes of a novel “biological prosthesis” for pediatric humerus reconstruction after major bone tumor removal. This approach involves a hollow 3D-printed titanium custom-made prosthesis combined with bone grafting. The primary aim was to preserve and revitalize the unaffected autologous proximal or distal humeral stump. Between 2017 and 2021, we treated five pediatric patients (mean age 11.2 years; range 7–17) with humeral bone sarcomas. A one-stage surgical procedure involved tumor resection and implanting a hollow 3D-printed custom-made prosthesis. In two cases, we preserved the proximal humerus; in two, the distal part; and in one, both. Graft materials included homologous bone chips in three cases and free vascularized fibular grafts in two cases. All patients were clinically and radiographically assessed after a mean follow-up of 32.2 months (range of 14–68). No significant complications were observed, and no implant revisions were needed. Osseointegration was evident in all cases within eight months post-surgery; vascular support for the remaining autologous stump was demonstrated in all cases. Our hollow 3D-printed custom-made prosthesis and bone grafting offer the potential for partial or complete articular surface preservation. This approach encourages revascularization of the epiphysis, leading to satisfactory outcomes in humerus reconstruction within the pediatric population