Diagnosis Of Vertical Root Fracture With Cone-beam Computerized Tomography In Endodontically Treated Teeth: Three Case Reports.

A definitive diagnosis of vertical root fracture (VRF) is often a challenging task for clinicians. This is because two dimensional periapical radiographs are usually unable to detect the fracture line due to the direction of the X-ray beam. This report presents a set of 3 cases of endodontically treated teeth that were diagnosed with VRFs based on findings from clinical, radiographic, and cone-beam computerized tomographic (CBCT) examinations. After extraction, VRFs were confirmed in all cases. The presence of periodontal pockets or other signs which would compromise the correct diagnosis could not be detected in all three cases. Fracture lines were only visible with the aid of CBCT which provided useful information for the diagnosis and management of VRF. However, the clinical and radiographic data should not be discarded, but used in conjunction with CBCT.875-

Diagnosis of Vertical Root Fracture with Cone-Beam Computerized Tomography in Endodontically Treated Teeth: Three Case Reports

A definitive diagnosis of vertical root fracture (VRF) is often a challenging task for clinicians. This is because two dimensional periapical radiographs are usually unable to detect the fracture line due to the direction of the X-ray beam. This report presents a set of 3 cases of endodontically treated teeth that were diagnosed with VRFs based on findings from clinical, radiographic, and cone-beam computerized tomographic (CBCT) examinations. After extraction, VRFs were confirmed in all cases. The presence of periodontal pockets or other signs which would compromise the correct diagnosis could not be detected in all three cases. Fracture lines were only visible with the aid of CBCT which provided useful information for the diagnosis and management of VRF. However, the clinical and radiographic data should not be discarded, but used in conjunction with CBCT

Localización efectiva de un segundo conducto radicular en incisivos inferiores mediante magnificación, radiografía y diafanización

Objetivo: Evaluar in vitro, la efectividad del método visual y radiográfico, comparándolos con la técnica de diafanización en la detección del segundo conducto radicular de incisivos inferiores tratados endodónticamente. Material y métodos: Fueron analizados 133 dientes incisivos inferiores permanentes, tratados endodónticamente, a través de métodos visuales (con y sin auxilio de magnificación), radiográficos y de diafanización. El análisis radiográfico fue realizado en negatoscopio utilizando una lupa estereoscópica (10X). Posteriormente, fue realizada la remoción completa de la obturación provisional para la exploración visual con y sin auxilio de microscopio clínico (MO) en un aumento de 12X. Finalmente los dientes fueron diafanizados y almacenados en salicilato de metila para posterior análisis. Dos evaluadores calibrados registraron los datos referentes a la presencia o no del segundo conducto radicular para cada uno de los métodos utilizados. Resultados: El análisis radiográfico mostró la presencia del segundo conducto en 24 dientes (18,05%). Visualmente, fue encontrado en 4 dientes (3,00%) sin magnificación y en 16 dientes (12,03%) con ayuda del MO. A través de la diafanización, 34 dientes (25,95%) presentaron segundo conducto. Conclusiones: La asociación de técnicas radiográficas y la magnificación visual obtenida con la utilización del MO se muestran como los aliados clínicos más efectivos para la localización del segundo conducto radicular en incisivos inferiores

Postoperative pain after single-visit root canal treatments in necrotic teeth comparing instruments’ kinematics and apical instrumentation limits – a prospective randomized multicenter clinical trial

Abstract Objectives This prospective randomized multicenter clinical trial (PRMCT) investigated postoperative pain after single-visit root canal treatments in teeth affected by pulp necrosis (PN), and asymptomatic apical periodontitis (AAP) (with apical radiolucent areas) or normal periradicular tissues (without apical radiolucent areas) comparing different instruments' kinematics and apical instrumentation limits. Methods Before chemomechanical preparation, 240 patients/teeth were randomly distributed into four groups (n = 60) according to the instruments' kinematics (rotary or reciprocating) and apical instrumentation limits (with or without intentional foraminal enlargement [IFE]). After that, specimens were submitted to the same irrigation and obturation techniques, and the patients were referred to undergo the definitive restorations. No medication was prescribed, but the patients were instructed to take either paracetamol (750 mg every 6 h for three days) or ibuprofen (600 mg every 6 h for three days) in pain cases. Postoperative pain incidence and levels were assessed at 24-, 48-, and 72 h following treatment completion according to a verbal rating scale (VRS) following a score. The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was applied to assess the normality of the data. Mann–Whitney U, Chi-square, Friedman's ANOVA, and Friedman's multiple 2 to 2 comparison tests were employed to identify potential significant statistical differences among the variables in the study groups (P < .05). Results Significant statistical differences were only observed among the groups considering tooth, periradicular status, and the occurrence of overfilling (sealer extrusion) (P < 0.00). Patients with teeth instrumented through rotary kinematics and without IFE experienced lower rates of postoperative pain; however, this difference was relevant only at 24 h (P < 0.05). Conclusions Postoperative pain was lower after using a rotary file system (Profile 04) inserted up to the apical constriction (AC). However, this finding was just statistically meaningful at 24 h. Trial registration This PRMCT was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of the Paranaense University – UNIPAR, Francisco Beltrão, PR, Brazil (CAAE. 46,774,621.6.0000.0109) on 02/09/2021. It was registered at The Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials – ReBEC (RBR-3r967t) on 01/06/2023, was performed according to the Principles of the Helsinki Declaration and is reported following the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials Statement