3 research outputs found
Towards a Cognitive Semiotic aprroach to cinema: Semiotics vs. 'Semiology'
[Abstract] The point of departure for an eventual presentation is the question if a cognition (in semiotics) always has to be formulated in the terms of a triadic sign, as is it is done sometimes when applying a Peircian perspective on film (Ehrat 2005: 72). The problem of the importance of a âThirdâ is at stake when discussing how film produces meaning. To understand film is also to understand the concept of cinema, to paraphrase the famous example postulated by Peirce about giving and gift. But is it correct in this conjunction to criticise âsemiologyâ represented, for instance, by Greimasâ âtransfer dâobjetâ (Ehrat 2005: 121-22) of a degeneration into a dyadic approach not only to gifts but also more generally to narration (i.e., time) in film? Now, to refer to the opening line: if, according to Peirce, a cognition always is âa cognition of the Realâ (Ehrat 2005: 140) couldnât a concept of the Real also be said to be comprised in Metzâs (another example of an early âsemiologâ) postulation that âmovementâ (here interpreted in terms of Peirceâs Pragmaticist concept of action) in film images convey life, i.e., the Real (Metz 2003 [1968]: 17)? This being so, one could add, because film is intrinsically iconic. Thus, may we dispense with linguistics when analysing narration in film? Well, linguistics is ânot necessary to the analysis of filmic narrationâ (Buckland 2000:5). As Sonesson (2009: 63) writes (about pictures) in âthis respect [âŠ] pictures are actually better than verbal language at suggesting a story lineâ. The sequentiality of film â of course â enforces this inherent potential o
How Will the Emerging Plurality of Lives Change How We Conceive of and Relate to Life?
The project âA Plurality of Livesâ was funded and hosted by the Pufendorf Institute for Advanced Studies at Lund University, Sweden. The aim of the project was to better understand how a second origin of life, either in the form of a discovery of extraterrestrial life, life developed in a laboratory, or machines equipped with abilities previously only ascribed to living beings, will change how we understand and relate to life. Because of the inherently interdisciplinary nature of the project aim, the project took an interdisciplinary approach with a research group made up of 12 senior researchers representing 12 different disciplines. The project resulted in a joint volume, an international symposium, several new projects, and a network of researchers in the field, all continuing to communicate about and advance the aim of the project