Quality of life in carotid atherosclerosis: The role of co-morbid mood disorders

Introduction/Objective: To study in severe carotid atherosclerosis (CA): The frequency of mood disorders (MD); the impairment of quality of life (QoL); the role of co-morbid MD in such impairment. Methods: Case-control study. Cases: consecutive in-patients with CA (stenosis ≥ 50%). Controls: subjects with no diagnosis of CA randomized from a database of a community survey. Psychiatric diagnosis according to DSM-IV made by clinicians and semi-structured interview, QoL measured by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-12). Results: This is the first study on comorbidity on CA disease and MD in which psychiatric diagnoses are conducted by clinicians according to DSM-IV diagnostic criteria. Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) (17.4% vs 2.72%, P <0.0001) but not Bipolar Disorders (BD) (4.3% vs 0.5%, P = 0.99) was higher in cases (N=46) than in controls (N= 184). SF-12 scores in cases were lower than in controls (30.56±8.12 vs 36.81±6:40; p <0.001) with QoL comparable to serious chronic diseases of the central nervous system. The burden of a concomitant MDD or BD amplifies QoL impairment. Conclusion: Comorbid MD aggravates the impairment of QoL in CA. Unlike autoimmune diseases or degenerative diseases of the Central Nervous System, CA shows a strong risk of MDD than BD

Connectometry evaluation in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy: an exploratory study.

This research investigated local brain connectivity changes following Carotid Endarterectomy (CEA) by connectometry. Seventeen subjects (15 males and 2 females, mean age 74.1 years), all eligible for CEA, were prospectively recruited in this exploratory study. On the same day within the week before the CEA, each patient underwent a cognitive evaluation with a Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) and a Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) exam that included a DTI sequence for the connectometry analysis. A second MMSE and the same MRI protocol were performed on follow-up, 3-6 months after CEA. The MMSE scores were analyzed using T-Student tests. The connectometry analysis was performed using a multiple regression model to consider the effect of CEA, choosing three different T-score threshold (T-threshold) values (1, 2 and 3). Results were considered statistically valid for p value adjusted for False Discovery Rate (p-FDR) < 0.05. Comparison of pre-CEA and post-CEA MMSE scores showed improvement of MMSE scores after CEA. Connectometry analysis revealed no areas of statistically significant increased connectivity related to CEA for T-threshold value = 1 and 2, but showed statistically significant increase of connectivity after CEA in both cerebellar hemispheres and corpus callosum for T-threshold value = 3 (p-FDR = 0.0106667). The network property analysis showed improved small worldness (2.14%), clustering coefficient (1.64%), local (1.94%) and global efficiency (0.56%), and reduced characteristic path length (-0.52%) after CEA. These results suggest that CEA is associated both with cognitive performance improvement and changes in interhemispheric local connectivity in the corpus callosum and cerebellum

Carotid artery stenosis and brain connectivity: the role of white matter hyperintensities

Purpose It is under debate how white matter hyperintensities (WMH) affects the brain connectivity. The objective of this research study is to validate the hypothesis, if and how the WMH influences brain connectivity in a population with carotid artery stenosis (CAS), which are eligible for carotid endarterectomy (CEA). We used resting state functional connectivity (rs-fc) magnetic resonance (MR) to validate our hypothesis, focusing on the effects of the total number of WMH (TNWMH) and of the WMH Burden (WMHB). Methods Twenty-three patients (sixteen males and seven females, mean age 74.34 years) with mono or bilateral carotid stenosis eligible for carotid endarterectomy (CEA), underwent an MR examination on a 1.5-T scanner. The protocol included a morphologic T1-3D isotropic, an EPI functional sequence for rs-fc MR analysis, and a 3D isotropic FLAIR sequence. For each patient, the TNWMH and the WMHB were obtained using two online tools-volBrain and lesionBrain. The rs-fc region-of-interest to region-of-interest (ROI-to-ROI) analysis was performed with the CONN toolbox v18a: two different multiple regression analyses including both WMHB and TNWMH as second-level covariates evaluated the individual effects of WMHB (Analysis A) and TNWMH (Analysis B), adopting a p value corrected for false discovery rate (p-FDR) &lt; 0.05 to identify statistically significant values. Results Both analyses A and B identified several statistically significant positive and negative correlations associated with WMHB and TNWMH. Conclusion WMH influence functional connectivity in patients with carotid artery stenosis eligible for CEA; further, WMHB and TNWMH influence differently functional connectivity

Reorganization of brain networks following carotid endarterectomy: an exploratory study using resting state functional connectivity with a focus on the changes in Default Mode Network connectivity.

OBJECTIVES: To assess whether there is mid-term reorganization in brain networks connectivity after Carotid Endarterectomy (CEA) using resting state functional connectivity Magnetic Resonance (fc-rsMR), with a special focus on the Default Mode Network (DMN). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective exploratory study, 14 asymptomatic consecutive patients (10 males and 4 females, mean age 73.5) with unilateral, significant ICA stenosis eligible for CEA according to European Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines were prospectively recruited. The week before CEA procedure, each patient underwent both neurocognitive and rs-fcMR evaluations on the same day; the neurocognitive test consisted on a Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE). The same neurocognitive test and rs-fcMR examination were repeated on follow-up between 3-6 months after CEA. MMSE scores were compared using paired T-Student Test. Rs-fcMR Region Of Interest (ROI-to-ROI) and Seed-to-voxel group analysis were conducted using the CONN toolbox v18 and the SPM 12 software. RESULTS: Patients showed improvements in MMSE scores from before to after CEA (p-value = 0.0001). ROI-to-ROI analysis revealed several statistically significant connectivity changes following CEA, both in terms of positive and negative correlations; Seed-to-Voxel focusing on DMN revealed increased connectivity between medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and three different clusters of voxels. CONCLUSIONS: CEA procedure is associated with an improvement in neurocognitive performance (according to MMSE testing) and reorganization of functional connectivity, including the DMN. These results represent a starting point in order to design further studies for a better understanding of the reorganization of brain networks following CEA, and to investigate the potential role of CEA as a therapeutic procedure for cognitive impairments in selected patients with critical ICA stenosis

Reorganization of brain networks following carotid endarterectomy: an exploratory study using resting state functional connectivity with a focus on the changes in Default Mode Network connectivity.

OBJECTIVES: To assess whether there is mid-term reorganization in brain networks connectivity after Carotid Endarterectomy (CEA) using resting state functional connectivity Magnetic Resonance (fc-rsMR), with a special focus on the Default Mode Network (DMN). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective exploratory study, 14 asymptomatic consecutive patients (10 males and 4 females, mean age 73.5) with unilateral, significant ICA stenosis eligible for CEA according to European Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines were prospectively recruited. The week before CEA procedure, each patient underwent both neurocognitive and rs-fcMR evaluations on the same day; the neurocognitive test consisted on a Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE). The same neurocognitive test and rs-fcMR examination were repeated on follow-up between 3-6 months after CEA. MMSE scores were compared using paired T-Student Test. Rs-fcMR Region Of Interest (ROI-to-ROI) and Seed-to-voxel group analysis were conducted using the CONN toolbox v18 and the SPM 12 software. RESULTS: Patients showed improvements in MMSE scores from before to after CEA (p-value = 0.0001). ROI-to-ROI analysis revealed several statistically significant connectivity changes following CEA, both in terms of positive and negative correlations; Seed-to-Voxel focusing on DMN revealed increased connectivity between medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and three different clusters of voxels. CONCLUSIONS: CEA procedure is associated with an improvement in neurocognitive performance (according to MMSE testing) and reorganization of functional connectivity, including the DMN. These results represent a starting point in order to design further studies for a better understanding of the reorganization of brain networks following CEA, and to investigate the potential role of CEA as a therapeutic procedure for cognitive impairments in selected patients with critical ICA stenosis

Patients with carotid atherosclerosis who underwent or did not undergo carotid endarterectomy: outcome on mood, cognition and quality of life

Background: To compare the six-month outcome on mood, cognition and quality of life (QoL) in patients with severe carotid atherosclerosis (CA) who underwent carotid endarterectomy (CEA) with subjects who refused treatment. Methods: Cohort study on consecutive inpatients with CA (stenosis ≥ 50 %) (N= 46; age 72.56 ± 7.26; male 65.2 %). Intervention cohort: subjects who decided to undergo CEA (N = 35); Control cohort patients who refused CEA (N= 11). DSM-IV-Psychiatric diagnosis made by clinicians using interviews, QoL measured by Short Form Health Survey (SF-12); cognitive performance by WAIS Intelligent Coefficient (IC). Results: The study showed a better improvement during six months in Overall IC, Performance IC and Verbal IC in the group that underwent CEA. QoL in the two cohorts did not reach statistical significance. Percentages of patients who improved in the CEA group were significantly higher with regard to Overall and Verbal IC scores, and at the limits of statistical significance in Performance IC. The differences of subject with improvement in SF-12 score in the two groups did not reach statistical significance. Ages below 68 were found to be determinant of a good outcome in Overall IC score. Limit: study conducted with a small sample size. Conclusions: Patients with severe carotid atherosclerosis who underwent CEA enhanced their cognitive performance