A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer.

Background Laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer is widely used. However, robust evidence to conclude that laparoscopic surgery and open surgery have similar outcomes in rectal cancer is lacking. A trial was designed to compare 3-year rates of cancer recurrence in the pelvic or perineal area (locoregional recurrence) and survival after laparoscopic and open resection of rectal cancer. Methods In this international trial conducted in 30 hospitals, we randomly assigned patients with a solitary adenocarcinoma of the rectum within 15 cm of the anal verge, not invading adjacent tissues, and without distant metastases to undergo either laparoscopic or open surgery in a 2:1 ratio. The primary end point was locoregional recurrence 3 years after the index surgery. Secondary end points included disease-free and overall survival. Results A total of 1044 patients were included (699 in the laparoscopic-surgery group and 345 in the open-surgery group). At 3 years, the locoregional recurrence rate was 5.0% in the two groups (difference, 0 percentage points; 90% confidence interval [CI], −2.6 to 2.6). Disease-free survival rates were 74.8% in the laparoscopic-surgery group and 70.8% in the open-surgery group (difference, 4.0 percentage points; 95% CI, −1.9 to 9.9). Overall survival rates were 86.7% in the laparoscopic-surgery group and 83.6% in the open-surgery group (difference, 3.1 percentage points; 95% CI, −1.6 to 7.8). Conclusions Laparoscopic surgery in patients with rectal cancer was associated with rates of locoregional recurrence and disease-free and overall survival similar to those for open surgery. (Funded by Ethicon Endo-Surgery Europe and others; COLOR II ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00297791.

Laparoscopic versus open colectomy for colon cancer in an older population: a cohort study

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer has been compared with open colectomy in randomized controlled trials, but these studies may not be generalizable because of strict enrollment and exclusion criteria which may explicitly or inadvertently exclude older individuals due to associated comorbidities. Previous studies of older patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy have generally focused on short-term outcomes. The goals of this cohort study were to identify predictors of laparoscopic colectomy in an older population in the United States and to compare short-term and long-term outcomes.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Patients aged 65 years or older with incident colorectal cancer diagnosed 1996-2002 who underwent colectomy within 6 months of cancer diagnosis were identified from the linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database. Laparoscopic and open colectomy patients were compared with respect to length of stay, blood transfusion requirements, intensive care unit monitoring, complications, 30-day mortality, and long-term survival. We adjusted for potential selection bias in surgical approach with propensity score matching.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Laparoscopic colectomy cases were associated with left-sided tumors; areas with higher population density, income, and education level; areas in the western United States; and National Cancer Institute-designated cancer centers. Laparoscopic colectomy cases had shorter length of stay and less intensive care unit monitoring. Although laparoscopic colectomy patients (n = 424) had fewer complications (21.5% versus 26.3%), lower 30-day mortality (3.3% versus 5.8%), and longer median survival (6.6 versus 4.8 years) compared with open colectomy patients (n = 27,012), after propensity score matching these differences disappeared.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>In this older population, laparoscopic colectomy practice patterns were associated with factors which likely correlate with tertiary referral centers. Although short-term and long-term survival are comparable, laparoscopic colectomy offers shorter hospitalizations and less intensive care.</p

Laparoscopic and open resection for colorectal cancer: an evaluation of cellular immunity

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Colorectal cancer is one kind of frequent malignant tumors of the digestive tract which gets high morbidity and mortality allover the world. Despite the promising clinical results recently, less information is available regarding the perioperative immunological effects of laparoscopic surgery when compared with the open surgery. This study aimed to compare the cellular immune responses of patients who underwent laparoscopic(LCR) and open resections(OCR) for colorectal cancer.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Between Mar 2009 and Sep 2009, 35 patients with colorectal carcinoma underwent LCR by laparoscopic surgeon. These patients were compared with 33 cases underwent conventional OCR by colorectal surgeon. Clinical data about the patients were collected prospectively. Comparison of the operative details and postoperative outcomes between laparoscopic and open resection was performed. Peripheral venous blood samples from these 68 patients were taken prior to surgery as well as on postoperative days(POD) 1, 4 and 7. Cell counts of total white blood cells, neutrophils, lymphocyte subpopulations, natural killer(NK) cells as well as CRP were determined by blood counting instrument, flow cytometry and hematology analyzer.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>There was no difference in the age, gender and tumor status between the two groups. The operating time was a little longer in the laparoscopic group (<it>P </it>> 0.05), but the blood loss was less (<it>P </it>= 0.039). Patients with laparoscopic resection had earlier return of bowel function and earlier resumption of diet as well as shorter median hospital stay (<it>P </it>< 0.001). Compared with OCR group, cell numbers of total lymphocytes, CD4⁺T cells and CD8⁺T cells were significant more in LCR group (<it>P </it>< 0.05) on POD 4, while there was no difference in the CD45RO⁺T or NK cell numbers between the two groups. Cellular immune responds were similar between the two groups on POD1 and POD7.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Laparoscopic colorectal resection gets less surgery stress and short-term advantages compared with open resection. Cellular immune respond appears to be less affected by laparoscopic colorectal resection when compared with open resection.</p

The quality of research synthesis in surgery: the case of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer

Peer reviewedPublisher PD

Lymph node dissection by laparoscopic surgery in patients underwent right colon cancer treatment

Aim To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and properties of dissected lymph nodes from the specimen of laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for colon carcinoma. Materials and method To perform a cross-sectional study of 80 right colon carcinoma patients who underwent laparoscopic right hemicolectomy at K Hospital of Hanoi Medical University and Can Tho Oncology Hospital from June 2012 to June 2016. Results and discussion There were 36 male and 44 female patients. Age ranges from 20-87-year-old, the average age was 54.8 ± 1.7. 15 patients had a history of previous operations. The mean size of tumors was 4.9 ± 0.2cm (1.5–6cm). A total of 992 lymph nodes were harvested, the mean number of nodes dissection for each patient was 12.4 mm ± 2.8 (6–43mm). The number of nodes dissection whose size from 0.5 to 1cm were 589 (59.4%). Majority of lymph node’s location was closed to the tumor edge and along arteries: ileocolic, right and middle colic arteries (80.1%). Metastatic rate of lymph nodes was moderate (40%). Conclusion Within the limit of this study, lymphadenectomy in Laparoscopic surgery for right colon carcinoma was the feasible and safe procedure. It conforms to the oncological principles. Characteristic properties of dissected lymph nodes from the specimen revealed mean of nodes dissection for each patient were 12.4mm; a majority of node’s locations were closed to the tumor edge and along the ileocolic, right colic and middle colic arteries. Metastatic rate of lymph nodes was moderate (40%)