50 research outputs found

    Landslide initiation and runout susceptibility modeling in the context of hill cutting and rapid urbanization: a combined approach of weights of evidence and spatial multi-criteria

    Get PDF
    Rainfall induced landslides are a common threat to the communities living on dangerous hill-slopes in Chittagong Metropolitan Area, Bangladesh. Extreme population pressure, indiscriminate hill cutting, increased precipitation events due to global warming and associated unplanned urbanization in the hills are exaggerating landslide events. The aim of this article is to prepare a scientifically accurate landslide susceptibility map by combining landslide initiation and runout maps. Land cover, slope, soil permeability, surface geology, precipitation, aspect, and distance to hill cut, road cut, drainage and stream network factor maps were selected by conditional independence test. The locations of 56 landslides were collected by field surveying. A weight of evidence (WoE) method was applied to calculate the positive (presence of landslides) and negative (absence of landslides) factor weights. A combination of analytical hierarchical process (AHP) and fuzzy membership standardization (weighs from 0 to 1) was applied for performing a spatial multi-criteria evaluation. Expert opinion guided the decision rule for AHP. The Flow-R tool that allows modeling landslide runout from the initiation sources was applied. The flow direction was calculated using the modified Holmgren’s algorithm. The AHP landslide initiation and runout susceptibility maps were used to prepare a combined landslide susceptibility map. The relative operating characteristic curve was used for model validation purpose. The accuracy of WoE, AHP, and combined susceptibility map was calculated 96%, 97%, and 98%, respectively

    Recommendations for the quantitative analysis of landslide risk

    Get PDF
    This paper presents recommended methodologies for the quantitative analysis of landslide hazard, vulnerability and risk at different spatial scales (site-specific, local, regional and national), as well as for the verification and validation of the results. The methodologies described focus on the evaluation of the probabilities of occurrence of different landslide types with certain characteristics. Methods used to determine the spatial distribution of landslide intensity, the characterisation of the elements at risk, the assessment of the potential degree of damage and the quantification of the vulnerability of the elements at risk, and those used to perform the quantitative risk analysis are also described. The paper is intended for use by scientists and practising engineers, geologists and other landslide experts

    Spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility using random forest algorithm

    No full text
    Intelligent data analytics approaches are popular in landslide susceptibility mapping. This chapter develops a random forest (RF) approach for spatial modeling of landslide susceptibility. A total number of 78 landslide locations are identified using field survey, 55 of which are randomly selected to model landslide susceptibility and remaining 23 locations considered for model validation. Twelve predictor variables are selected: elevation, slope percentage, slope aspect, plan curvature, profile curvature, distance from roads, distance from streams, distance from faults, lithological formations, land use, soil type, and topographic wetness index (TWI) to create an RF model for landslide susceptibility mapping. The results of RF model are evaluated using efficiency (E), true positive rate (TPR), false positive rate (FPR), true skill statistic (TSS), and area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) in training and validation steps. RF model registered excellent goodness-of-fit with AUC = 93.6%, E = 0.887, TSS = 0.776, TPR = 0.905, FPR = 0.129, and predictive performance with AUC = 90.7%, E = 0.777, TSS = 0.559, TPR = 0.809, FPR = 0.25. Intelligent data analytic method, therefore, has a significant promise in tackling challenges of landslide susceptibility mapping in large regions, which may not have sufficient geotechnical data to employ a physically based method
    corecore