24 research outputs found

    Metabolic syndrome is associated with change in subclinical arterial stiffness - A community-based Taichung Community Health Study

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of MetS on arterial stiffness in a longitudinal study.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV), a measurement interpreted as arterial stiffness, was measured in 1518 community-dwelling persons at baseline and re-examined within a mean follow-up period of 3 years. Multivariate linear regression with generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to examine the longitudinal relationship between MetS and its individual components and baPWV, while multivariate logistic regression with GEE was used to examine the longitudinal relationship between MetS and its individual components and the high risk group with arterial stiffness.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Subjects with MetS showed significantly greater baPWV at the end point than those without MetS, after adjusting for age, gender, education, hypertension medication and mean arterial pressure (MAP). MetS was associated with the top quartile of baPWV (the high-risk group of arterial stiffness, adjusted odds ratio [95% confidence interval] 1.52 [1.21-1.90]), and a significant linear trend of risk for the number of components of MetS was found (p for trend < 0.05). In further considering the individual MetS component, elevated blood pressure and fasting glucose significantly predicted a high risk of arterial stiffness (adjusted OR [95% CI] 3.72 [2.81-4.93] and 1.35 [1.08-1.68], respectively).</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>MetS affects the subject's progression to arterial stiffness. Arterial stiffness increased as the number of MetS components increased. Management of MetS is important for preventing the progression to advanced arterial stiffness.</p

    Importância relativa do Índice de Massa Corporal e da circunferência abdominal na predição da hipertensão arterial Relative importance of body mass index and waist circumference for hypertension in adults

    Get PDF
    OBJETIVO: Avaliar a importância relativa do Índice de Massa Corporal (IMC) e da circunferência abdominal na determinação da hipertensão arterial em adultos. MÉTODOS: Estudo transversal com amostra de funcionários (N=1.584), entre 18 e 64 anos de idade, de hospital geral privado do município de São Paulo. A coleta de dados envolveu questionário estruturado, medida da pressão arterial, peso, altura e circunferência abdominal. A hipertensão foi diagnosticada com pressão arterial > 140/90 mmHg ou uso de medicação anti-hipertensiva. A importância relativa do IMC e da circunferência abdominal foi calculada pela fração atribuível de hipertensão correspondente a cada indicador antropométrico, empregando-se níveis de cortes usuais e baseados na distribuição observada na população estudada. Adicionalmente, foi desenvolvido um indicador que combinou simultaneamente valores de IMC e circunferência abdominal. RESULTADOS: A prevalência de hipertensão foi de 18,9% (26,9% em homens e 12,5% em mulheres). Em homens, a fração de hipertensão atribuível ao IMC superou aquela atribuível à circunferência abdominal segundo níveis de corte usuais (56% x 48%, respectivamente) e quartis da distribuição observada (73% x 69%, respectivamente). Para mulheres, a fração de hipertensão atribuível à circunferência abdominal superou ligeiramente aquela atribuível ao IMC nos níveis de corte usuais (44% x 41%, respectivamente); mas se observou situação inversa empregando a classificação em quartis (41% x 57%, respectivamente). Somente em mulheres a fração de hipertensão atribuível ao indicador que combinou IMC e circunferência abdominal (64%) superou a fração atribuível a cada medida isolada. CONCLUSÕES: Tanto o IMC quanto a circunferência abdominal se associaram positiva e independentemente com a ocorrência de hipertensão arterial, sendo superior a influência exercida pelo IMC em homens.<br>OBJECTIVE: To assess the relative importance of Body Mass Index (BMI) and waist circumference for the determination of hypertension in adults. METHODS: Cross sectional analysis of a sample of employees (N=1,584), aged 18 to 64 years, from a private general hospital in the city of São Paulo, Brazil. Data collection included the application of a structured questionnaire and blood pressure, weight, high, and waist circumference measurements. Hypertension was defined as blood pressure levels > 140/90 mmHg or reported use of anti-hypertensive medication. The relative importance of BMI and waist circumference was evaluated by calculating the attributable fraction of hypertension corresponding to each anthropometric indicator, employing both the usual cut-off points as well as cut-off points based on the observed distribution of the indicator in the population. In addition, an indicator combining simultaneously BMI and abdominal circumference values was also developed. RESULTS: Prevalence of hypertension was 18.9% (26.9% in men and 12.5% in women). In men, the fraction of hypertension attributable to BMI exceeded the fraction attributable to waist circumference based on the usual cut-off points for the indicators (56% vs. 48%, respectively) and also considering the quartiles of the observed distribution for these indicators (73% vs. 69%, respectively). In women, the fraction of hypertension attributable to waist circumference was slightly higher than the fraction attributable to BMI based on the usual cut off points for both indicators (44% vs. 41%), but the reverse was true when quartiles of the observed distribution were used (41% vs. 57%, respectively). In women only, the fraction of hypertension attributable to the indicator combining BMI and waist circumference (64%) was higher that observed using each indicator alone. CONCLUSIONS: Both BMI and abdominal circumference were positively and independently associated with the occurrence of arterial hypertension, the influence of BMI being higher among men
    corecore