Passing the Panda Standard: A TAD Off the Mark?

Tilapia, a tropical freshwater fish native to Africa, is an increasingly important global food commodity. The World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF), a major environmental nongovernmental organization, has established stakeholder dialogues to formulate farm certification standards that promote ‘‘responsible’’ culture practices. As a preface to its ‘‘tilapia aquaculture dialogue,’’ the WWF for Nature commissioned a review of potential certification issues, later published as a peer-reviewed article. This article contends that both the review and the draft certification standards subsequently developed fail to adequately integrate critical factors governing the relative sustainability of tilapia production and thereby miss more significant issues related to resource-use efficiency and the appropriation of ecosystem space and services. This raises a distinct possibility that subsequent certification will promote intensive systems of tilapia production that are far less ecologically benign than existing widely practiced semiintensive alternatives. Given the likely future significance of this emergent standard, it is contended that a more holistic approach to certification is essential

Production and use of two marine zooplanktons, Tigriopus japonicus and Diaphanosoma celebensis, as live food for red sea bream Pagrus major larvae

We evaluated the effectiveness of two representative marine zooplankton, the harpacticoid copepod Tigriopus japonicus and the euryhaline cladoceran Diaphanosoma celebensis, as live food for red sea bream Pagrus major larvae. Chicken-dropping extract (CDE) was applied to both zooplankton cultures to improve population growth. Population growth of both zooplankton was significantly enhanced by CDE supplementation (at 1 or 2 ml/l). The highest amount of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and higher DHA/eicosapentaenoic acid ratio were detected in T. japonicus, whereas D. celebensis showed similar values to that of Artemia. Effectiveness of both animals as live food was tested by rearing red sea bream larvae on them for 28 days and comparing the results with those for Artemia. There were no significant differences in total length (8.6 ± 1.1?8.7 ± 0.7 mm) or wet weight (8.2 ± 0.3?9.4 ± 0.1 mg) among fish larvae feeding on the three different zooplankton. Survival rate was significantly higher with T. japonicus (39.4 ± 3.1 %) than with D. celebensis (20.8 ± 3.8 %) and Artemia (16.7 ± 9.8 %). Viability was significantly higher in fish fed with T. japonicus (60.0 ± 27.8 %) and D. celebensis (60.0 ± 32.2 %) than in those fed with Artemia (44.4 ± 12.3 %). Fish fed with T. japonicus contained higher n-3 highly unsaturated fatty acids than those fed with D. celebensis and Artemia. It is concluded that T. japonicus and D. celebensis have high potential as live food in marine fish larviculture