Connecting the sustainable development goals by their energy inter-linkages

The United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) provide guide-posts to society as it attempts to respond to an array of pressing challenges. One of these challenges is energy; thus, the SDGs have become paramount for energy policy-making. Yet, while governments throughout the world have already declared the SDGs to be 'integrated and indivisible', there are still knowledge gaps surrounding how the interactions between the energy SDG targets and those of the non-energy-focused SDGs might play out in different contexts. In this review, we report on a large-scale assessment of the relevant energy literature, which we conducted to better our understanding of key energy-related interactions between SDGs, as well as their context-dependencies (relating to time, geography, governance, technology, and directionality). By (i) evaluating the nature and strength of the interactions identified, (ii) indicating the robustness of the evidence base, the agreement of that evidence, and our confidence in it, and (iii) highlighting critical areas where better understanding is needed or context dependencies should be considered, our review points to potential ways forward for both the policy making and scientific communities. First, we find that positive interactions between the SDGs outweigh the negative ones, both in number and magnitude. Second, of relevance for the scientific community, in order to fill knowledge gaps in critical areas, there is an urgent need for interdisciplinary research geared toward developing new data, scientific tools, and fresh perspectives. Third, of relevance for policy-making, wider efforts to promote policy coherence and integrated assessments are required to address potential policy spillovers across sectors, sustainability domains, and geographic and temporal boundaries. The task of conducting comprehensive science-to-policy assessments covering all SDGs, such as for the UN's Global Sustainable Development Report, remains manageable pending the availability of systematic reviews focusing on a limited number of SDG dimensions in each case

More than 10,000 pre-Columbian earthworks are still hidden throughout Amazonia.

This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from the American Association for the Advancement of Science via the DOI in this recordData and materials availability: Data from publicly available sources are cited in the supplementary materials. Other data and computer codes used in the analysis are publicly available at Zenodo repositoryIndigenous societies are known to have occupied the Amazon basin for more than 12,000 years, but the scale of their influence on Amazonian forests remains uncertain. We report the discovery, using LIDAR (light detection and ranging) information from across the basin, of 24 previously undetected pre-Columbian earthworks beneath the forest canopy. Modeled distribution and abundance of large-scale archaeological sites across Amazonia suggest that between 10,272 and 23,648 sites remain to be discovered and that most will be found in the southwest. We also identified 53 domesticated tree species significantly associated with earthwork occurrence probability, likely suggesting past management practices. Closed-canopy forests across Amazonia are likely to contain thousands of undiscovered archaeological sites around which pre-Columbian societies actively modified forests, a discovery that opens opportunities for better understanding the magnitude of ancient human influence on Amazonia and its current state.Coordination of Superior Level Staff Improvement under the Academic Excellence Program (CAPES/PROEX)Coordination of Superior Level Staff Improvement under the Academic Excellence Program (CAPES/PROEX)Coordination of Superior Level Staff Improvement under the Academic Excellence Program (CAPES/PROEX)National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPQ)National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPQ)National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPQ)European Research CouncilSão Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP)Amazon FundSão Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP)PVEMEC/MCTI/CAPES/CNPq/FAPEuropean Union’s Horizon 2020European Union’s Horizon 2020CAPESANRMCT/CNPq/CT-INFRA/GEOMAMCT/CNPq/CT-INFRA/GEOMACAPES/PDSECAPES/FapespaCNPqFAPESPCNPq/CAPES/FAPS/BC-NewtonFAPEMATRoyal Society GCRF International Collaboration AwardNSF/DEBCNPQ/PQNatural Environment Research Council (NERC)Natural Environment Research Council (NERC)Natural Environment Research Council (NERC)Natural Environment Research Council (NERC)Natural Environment Research Council (NERC)Natural Environment Research Council (NERC)Natural Environment Research Council (NERC)Gordon and Betty Moore Foundatio