Reducing the environmental impact of surgery on a global scale: systematic review and co-prioritization with healthcare workers in 132 countries

Background Healthcare cannot achieve net-zero carbon without addressing operating theatres. The aim of this study was to prioritize feasible interventions to reduce the environmental impact of operating theatres. Methods This study adopted a four-phase Delphi consensus co-prioritization methodology. In phase 1, a systematic review of published interventions and global consultation of perioperative healthcare professionals were used to longlist interventions. In phase 2, iterative thematic analysis consolidated comparable interventions into a shortlist. In phase 3, the shortlist was co-prioritized based on patient and clinician views on acceptability, feasibility, and safety. In phase 4, ranked lists of interventions were presented by their relevance to high-income countries and low–middle-income countries. Results In phase 1, 43 interventions were identified, which had low uptake in practice according to 3042 professionals globally. In phase 2, a shortlist of 15 intervention domains was generated. In phase 3, interventions were deemed acceptable for more than 90 per cent of patients except for reducing general anaesthesia (84 per cent) and re-sterilization of ‘single-use’ consumables (86 per cent). In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for high-income countries were: introducing recycling; reducing use of anaesthetic gases; and appropriate clinical waste processing. In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for low–middle-income countries were: introducing reusable surgical devices; reducing use of consumables; and reducing the use of general anaesthesia. Conclusion This is a step toward environmentally sustainable operating environments with actionable interventions applicable to both high– and low–middle–income countries

Lumbar Spinal Stenosis in Elderly Patients

Over a 3-year period in our clinic, surgeons operated on 32 persons over 65 years old with lumbar spinal stenosis. This article presents the retrospective analysis of the clinical, radiological, and short-term surgical outcomes. The stenosis seen most commonly among the elderly develops focally at the intervertebral junctions as a result of a complex process of disc degeneration, facet arthropathy, ligamentum flavum hypertrophy, spondylosis, and sometimes spondylolisthesis. All patients underwent a midline decompressive laminectomy with foraminotomies at the affected levels, and diseectomy was performed in persons with lumbar disc hernia. Average age was 71.15 +/- 5.09 (65-80); 50% (16) were women, and 50% (16) were men. The most frequent symptoms were pain (96.9%) and neurological claudication (90.6%). The average preoperative duration of the symptoms was 139.87 +/- 115.03 weeks. The most frequent neurological symptoms were reflex disturbances (62.5%), Lasques's sign (SLR) (+)(53%), and motor deficit (50%). The anteroposterior diameter of the spinal canal was less than 11.5 rum in 71.9% of the cases. In 62.5% of the patients, partial recovery was observed in the short term; 68.8% of the patients underwent laminectomy. Of those, 873% had total and 12.5% had partial laminectomies. In addition to laminectomy, discectomy was performed in 31.3% of the patients. Total laminectomy was more likely to be performed on patients older than 65 years, because the anteroposterior diameter was more likely to be below 11.5 mm in this cohort of patients. In lumbar stenosis, surgical treatment-decompression-is an effective method. Surgery has been demonstrated to be effective even in patients over the age of 75 years