The venous thrombotic risk of oral contraceptives, effects of oestrogen dose and progestogen type: results of the MEGA case-control study

Objective To assess the thrombotic risk associated with oral contraceptive use with a focus on dose of oestrogen and type of progestogen of oral contraceptives available in the Netherlands

Can artificial intelligence separate the wheat from the chaff in systematic reviews of health economic articles?

The aim of this analysis was to investigate the performance of ASReview for screening titles and abstracts when performing a systematic literature review of health economic evaluations. To do this, the simulation function within ASReview was used to determine the order in which articles were presented to the reviewer. Moreover, two types of stopping rules were applied on screening with ASReview, and the accuracy and efficiency were determined using retrospective analysis. The analyis is described in detail in: Oude Wolcherink MJ, Pouwels XGLV, van Dijk SHB, Doggen CJM, Koffijberg H. Health Economic Research Can artificial intelligence separate the wheat from the chaff in systematic reviews of health economic articles? Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research. Augustus 2023 doi: 10.1080/14737167.2023.2234639. The zip.file includes data used for the analysis described above and scripts to run the analysis to generate the figures shown in the article above. You are also able to adapt the scripts to perform your own analysis on your own data. Please, read the README file careful and follow the steps indicated there

HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, other lipid-lowering medication, antiplatelet therapy, and the risk of venous thrombosis

Background: Statins [3-hydroxymethyl-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors] and antiplatelet therapy reduce the risk of atherosclerotic disease. Besides a reduction of lipid levels, statins might also have antithrombotic and anti-inflammatory properties, and anti-platelet therapy reduces clot formation. We have studied the risk of venous thrombosis with use of statins, other lipid-lowering medication, and antiplatelet therapy. Materials and methods: Patients with a first episode of deep vein thrombosis in the leg or pulmonary embolism between March 1999 and September 2004 were included in a large population-based case–control study (MEGA study). Control subjects were partners of patients (53%) or recruited via a random-digit-dialing method (47%). Participants reported different all-medication use in a questionnaire. Results: Of 4538 patients, 154 used statins (3.3%), as did 354 of 5914 control subjects (5.7%). The use of statins [odds ratio (OR) 0.45; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.36–0.56] but not other lipid-lowering medications (OR 1.22; 95% CI 0.62–2.43), was associated with a reduced venous thrombosis risk as compared with individuals who did not use any lipid-lowering medication, after adjustment for age, sex, body mass index, atherosclerotic disease, antiplatelet therapy and use of vitamin K antagonists. Different types and various durations of statin therapy were all associated with a decreased venous thrombosis risk. Antiplatelet therapy also reduced venous thrombosis risk (OR 0.56; 95% CI 0.42–0.74). However, sensitivity analyses suggested that this effect is most likely explained by a so-called ‘healthy user effect’. Simultaneous use of medication most strongly reduced venous thrombosis risk. Conclusion: These results suggest that the use of various types of statins is associated with a reduced risk of venous thrombosis, whereas antiplatelet therapy and other lipid-lowering medications are not.\u

Four-year clinical outcome following randomised use of zotarolimus-eluting stents versus everolimus-eluting stents in all-comers: Insights from the DUTCH PEERS trial

Background: The DUTCH PEERS (TWENTE II) trial (clinicaltrials.gov NCT01331707) is a randomised, multicenter, single-blinded, investigator initiated all-comers trial. All coronary syndromes were permitted with no limit for lesion length, reference size, or number of lesions or diseased vessels to be treated. In total, 1811 patients were 1:1 randomised to cobalt chromium-based zotarolimuseluting stents (ZES) versus platinum chromium-based everolimus-eluting stents (EES). These durable polymer-based drug-eluting stents (DES) were developed to facilitate device deliverability and to improve stent apposition to the vessel wall. Purpose: We assessed the 4-year clinical outcome of the DUTCH PEERS trial in terms of safety and efficacy. Methods: Clinical outcome was assessed by means of follow-up data of the trial participants. The primary endpoint target vessel failure (TVF) is a composite of cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction (MI) or target vessel revascularization. Secondary endpoints included the individual components of the TVF and the incidence of definite-or-probable stent thrombosis. Endpoints were analyzed by the logrank test by comparing the time to the endpoint, using the Kaplan-Meier method. Independent contract research organizations performed the study monitoring and clinical event adjudication. Results: The 4-year clinical follow-up data were available in 1802 patients (99.5%; 4 patients were lost to follow-up and 5 withdrew consent). The ZES and EES groups showed favourable outcomes with a similar incidence of TVF (12.1% vs. 12.1%; Logrank p=0.95). The rates of the individual components of TVF were also similar for both stent arms: cardiac death (3.9% vs. 3.7%; Logrank p=0.78); target vessel-related MI (3.2% vs. 2.5%; Logrank p=0.38); and target vessel revascularization (6.8% vs. 7.5%; Logrank p=0.55), respectively. In addition, the incidence of definite-or-probable stent thrombosis was similar for patients treated with ZES versus EES (1.5% vs. 1.2%; Logrank p=0.67). Conclusion: At 4-year follow-up, ZES and EES showed similar and sustained results in terms of safety and efficacy for treating all-comer patients

Long-term outcome and chest pain in patients with true versus non-true bifurcation lesions treated with second-generation drug-eluting stents in the TWENTE trial

The objective of this study is to assess 3-year clinical outcome of patients with true bifurcation lesions (TBLs) versus non-true bifurcation lesions (non-TBLs) following treatment with second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES). TBLs are characterized by the obstruction of both main vessel and side-branch. Limited data are available on long-term clinical outcome following TBL treatment with newer-generation DES. We performed an explorative sub-study of the randomized TWENTE trial among 287 patients who had bifurcated target lesions with side-branches ≥2.0 mm. Patients were categorized into TBL (Medina classes: 1.1.1; 1.0.1; 0.1.1) versus non-TBL to compare long-term clinical outcome. A total of 116 (40.4 %) patients had TBL, while 171 (59.6 %) had non-TBL only. Target-lesion revascularization rates were similar (3.5 vs. 3.5 %; p = 1.0), and definite-or-probable stent thrombosis rates were low (both <1.0 %). The target-vessel myocardial infarction (MI) rate was 11.3 versus 5.3 % (p = 0.06), mostly driven by (periprocedural) MI ≤48 h from PCI. All-cause mortality and cardiac death rates were 8.7 versus 3.5 % (p = 0.06) and 3.5 versus 1.2 % (p = 0.22), respectively. The 3-year major adverse cardiac event rate for patients with TBL versus non-TBL was 20.0 versus 11.7 % (p = 0.05). At 1-, 2-, and 3-year follow-up, 6.5, 13.0, and 11.0 % of patients reported chest pain at less than or equal moderate physical effort, respectively, without any between-group difference. Patients treated with second-generation DES for TBL had somewhat higher adverse event rates than patients with non-TBL, but dissimilarities did not reach statistical significance. Up to 3-year follow-up, the vast majority of patients of both groups remained free from chest pain