Quantitative promoter methylation analysis of multiple cancer-related genes in renal cell tumors

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Aberrant promoter hypermethylation of cancer-associated genes occurs frequently during carcinogenesis and may serve as a cancer biomarker. In this study we aimed at defining a quantitative gene promoter methylation panel that might identify the most prevalent types of renal cell tumors.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A panel of 18 gene promoters was assessed by quantitative methylation-specific PCR (QMSP) in 85 primarily resected renal tumors representing the four major histologic subtypes (52 clear cell (ccRCC), 13 papillary (pRCC), 10 chromophobe (chRCC), and 10 oncocytomas) and 62 paired normal tissue samples. After genomic DNA isolation and sodium bisulfite modification, methylation levels were determined and correlated with standard clinicopathological parameters.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Significant differences in methylation levels among the four subtypes of renal tumors were found for <it>CDH1 </it>(<it>p </it>= 0.0007), <it>PTGS2 </it>(<it>p </it>= 0.002), and <it>RASSF1A </it>(<it>p </it>= 0.0001). <it>CDH1 </it>hypermethylation levels were significantly higher in ccRCC compared to chRCC and oncocytoma (<it>p </it>= 0.00016 and <it>p </it>= 0.0034, respectively), whereas <it>PTGS2 </it>methylation levels were significantly higher in ccRCC compared to pRCC (<it>p </it>= 0.004). <it>RASSF1A </it>methylation levels were significantly higher in pRCC than in normal tissue (<it>p </it>= 0.035). In pRCC, <it>CDH1 </it>and <it>RASSF1A </it>methylation levels were inversely correlated with tumor stage (<it>p </it>= 0.031) and nuclear grade (<it>p </it>= 0.022), respectively.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The major subtypes of renal epithelial neoplasms display differential aberrant <it>CDH1</it>, <it>PTGS2</it>, and <it>RASSF1A </it>promoter methylation levels. This gene panel might contribute to a more accurate discrimination among common renal tumors, improving preoperative assessment and therapeutic decision-making in patients harboring suspicious renal masses.</p

Functional epigenomics approach to identify methylated candidate tumour suppressor genes in renal cell carcinoma

Promoter region hypermethylation and transcriptional silencing is a frequent cause of tumour suppressor gene (TSG) inactivation in many human cancers. Previously, to identify candidate epigenetically inactivated TSGs in renal cell carcinoma (RCC), we monitored changes in gene expression in four RCC cell lines after treatment with the demethylating agent 5-azacytidine. This enabled us to identify HAI-2/SPINT2 as a novel epigenetically inactivated candidate RCC TSG. To identify further candidate TSGs, we undertook bioinformatic and molecular genetic evaluation of a further 60 genes differentially expressed after demethylation. In addition to HAI-2/SPINT2, four genes (PLAU, CDH1, IGFB3 and MT1G) had previously been shown to undergo promoter methylation in RCC. After bioinformatic prioritisation, expression and/or methylation analysis of RCC cell lines±primary tumours was performed for 34 genes. KRT19 and CXCL16 were methylated in RCC cell lines and primary RCC; however, 22 genes were differentially expressed after demethylation but did not show primary tumour-specific methylation (methylated in normal tissue (n=1); methylated only in RCC cell lines (n=9) and not methylated in RCC cell lines (n=12)). Re-expression of CXCL16 reduced growth of an RCC cell line in vitro. In a summary, a functional epigenomic analysis of four RCC cell lines using microarrays representing 11 000 human genes yielded both known and novel candidate TSGs epigenetically inactivated in RCC, suggesting that this is valid strategy for the identification of novel TSGs and biomarkers

Identification of candidate tumour suppressor genes frequently methylated in renal cell carcinoma

Promoter region hyermethylation and transcriptional silencing is a frequent cause of tumour suppressor gene (TSG) inactivation in many types of human cancers. Functional epigenetic studies, in which gene expression is induced by treatment with demethylating agents, may identify novel genes with tumour-specific methylation. We used high-density gene expression microarrays in a functional epigenetic study of 11 renal cell carcinoma (RCC) cell lines. Twenty-eight genes were then selected for analysis of promoter methylation status in cell lines and primary RCC. Eight genes (BNC1, PDLIM4, RPRM, CST6, SFRP1, GREM1, COL14A1 and COL15A1) showed frequent (30% of RCC tested) tumour-specific promoter region methylation. Hypermethylation was associated with transcriptional silencing. Re-expression of BNC1, CST6, RPRM and SFRP1 suppressed the growth of RCC cell lines and RNA interference knock-down of BNC1, SFRP1 and COL14A1 increased the growth of RCC cell lines. Methylation of BNC1 or COL14A1 was associated with a poorer prognosis independent of tumour size, stage or grade. The identification of these epigenetically inactivated candidate RCC TSGs can provide insights into renal tumourigenesis and a basis for developing novel therapies and biomarkers for prognosis and detection. © 2010 Macmillan Publishers Limited.Published versio

The epigenetic landscape of renal cancer

This is an accepted manuscript of an article published by Nature in Nature Reviews: Nephrology on 28/11/2016, available online: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneph.2016.168 The accepted version of the publication may differ from the final published version.The majority of kidney cancers are associated with mutations in the von Hippel-Lindau gene and a small proportion are associated with infrequent mutations in other well characterized tumour-suppressor genes. In the past 15 years, efforts to uncover other key genes involved in renal cancer have identified many genes that are dysregulated or silenced via epigenetic mechanisms, mainly through methylation of promoter CpG islands or dysregulation of specific microRNAs. In addition, the advent of next-generation sequencing has led to the identification of several novel genes that are mutated in renal cancer, such as PBRM1, BAP1 and SETD2, which are all involved in histone modification and nucleosome and chromatin remodelling. In this Review, we discuss how altered DNA methylation, microRNA dysregulation and mutations in histone-modifying enzymes disrupt cellular pathways in renal cancers

A common variant of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (Glu298Asp) is an independent risk factor for carotid atherosclerosis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Endothelium-derived NO is formed from L-arginine by endothelial NO synthase (eNOS) encoded by the NOS 3 gene on chromosome 7. Because several studies have indicated that NO plays a key role in the development of the atherosclerotic process, we investigated whether common variants in the eNOS gene are associated with an increased risk of plaque on carotid arteries. METHODS: We studied 375 subjects attending the hypertension center of our institution to be screened for arterial hypertension. The examined subjects were classified according to the presence of carotid plaques (intima-media thickness >/=1.5 mm), and 2 intronic (CA and 27-bp repeats) polymorphisms and 1 exonic (Glu298Asp) polymorphism of the eNOS gene were explored. RESULTS: Only the Glu298Asp polymorphism of eNOS was associated with the presence of carotid plaques (P:<0.05). In particular, there was an excess of homozygotes for the Asp298 variant among subjects with carotid plaques, whereas the number of subjects who had the Glu298 allele in exon 7 of the eNOS gene was equally distributed in both study groups. Interestingly, the risk of having carotid plaques was increased approximately 3 times in subjects who were homozygotic for the Asp298 variant compared with subjects who were homozygotic for the Glu298 variant and was independent of the other common risk factors (age, blood pressure, and smoking). CONCLUSIONS: Homozygosity for Asp298, a common variant of the eNOS gene, is an independent risk factor for carotid atherosclerosis in this study population