766 research outputs found

    The glacial geology of eastern Sheridan County, North Dakota

    Get PDF
    During late Pleistocene time two ice advances affected parts of eastern Sheridan County, North Dakota. The first advance deposited the Burnstad, Streeter and Grace City drifts, and covered the whole county. The second advance deposited the Martin drift and occupied only the northern quarter of the county. The Streeter drift, characterize by dead-ice landforms and nonintegrated drainage, is separated from the Burnstad drift by a large partly collapsed outwash plain on the distal side of a pronounced ground moraine and poorly integrated drainage, is separated from the Streeter drift by the Lincoln Valley and moraine and the Missouri Coteau escarpment. Total ablation of the Grace City ice in this area must have occurred before formation of the Martin end moraine because large portions of outwash from an uncollapsed outwash plain were incorporated into the Martin end moraine north of Lincoln Valley. The Martin drift is characterized by high relief ground moraine, nonintegrated drainage and a slightly sandier lithology than that of the Streeter and Grace City drifts. North of the Martin end moraine several “shear” moraines and small area of dead-ice moraines are present. The ice retreated from Sheridan County less than 18,000 years ago. Several large potential sources of ground water are present in eastern Sheridan County, four large outwash plains each contain large quantities of shallow ground water. The buried channel of the ancient Knife River may also contain large amounts of ground water. Future economic growth of this are will depend partly of effective development of its large ground water resources and to a lesser degree on development of its abundant sand and gravel deposits

    Rutherdale, Robert — Hometown Horizons: Local Responses to Canada's Great War

    Get PDF

    Geothermal resources of the Texas Gulf Coast- Environmental concerns arising from the production and disposal of geothermal waters.

    Get PDF
    Disposal and temporary storage of spent geothermal fluids and surface subsidence and faulting are the major environmental problems that could arise from geopressured geothermal water production. Geopressured geothermal fluids are moderately to highly saline (8,000 to 72,000 parts per million total dissolved solids) and may contain significant amounts of boron (19 to 42 parts per million). Disposal of hot saline geothermal water in the subsurface saline aquifers will present the least hazard to the environment. It is not known, however, whether the disposal of as much as 54,000 m3 (310,000 barrels) of spent fluids per day into saline aquifers at the production site is technically or economically feasible. If saline aquifers adequate for fluid disposal cannot be found, geothermal fluids may have to be disposed of by open watercourses, canals and pipelines to coastal bays on the Gulf of Mexico. Overland flow or temporary storage of geothermal fluids may cause negative environmental impacts. As the result of production of large volumes of geothermal fluid, reservoir pressure declines may cause compaction of sediments within and adjacent to the reservoir. The amount of compaction depends on pressure decline, reservoir thickness, and reservoir compressibility. At present, these parameters can only be estimated. Reservoir compaction may be translated in part to surface subsidence. When differential compaction occurs across a subsurface fault, fault activation may occur and be manifested as differential subsidence across the surface trace of the fault or as an actual rupture of the land surface. The magnitude of environmental impact of subsidence and fault activation varies with current land use; the greatest impact would occur in urban areas, whereas relatively minor impacts would occur in rural, undeveloped agricultural areas. Geothermal resource production facilities on the Gulf Coast of Texas could be subject to a series of natural hazards: (1) hurricane- or storm-induced flooding, (2) winds from tropical storms, (3) coastal erosion, or (4) expansive soils. None of these hazards is generated by geothermal resource production, but each has potential for damaging geothermal production and disposal facilities that could, in turn, result in leakage of hot saline geothermal fluids
    • …
    corecore