Clinical and psychopathological features associated of obsessive and depersonalization disorders

The results of the study showed the presence of definite syntropia between various clinical variants of obsessive and depersonalization disorders. Autopsychic depersonalization is most characteristic for contrast obsessions, whereas somatopsychic depersonalization is for re-control obsessions. Derealization or allopsychic depersonalization are more often observed in patients with obstructive extracorporeal threats. Depersonalization of change is equally characteristic for patients with schizotypal disorder and psychogenic personality development, whereas depersonalization of loss and splitting were observed only in cases of schizophrenic spectrum disorders

An Analysis of the TRANSITION Study

Funding Information: This study was funded by Novartis . Funding Information: This study was funded by Novartis. The authors thank Tripti Sahu of Novartis Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. for providing medical writing support in accordance with Good Publication Practice (GPP 2022) guidelines (https://www.ismpp.org/gpp-2022). Publisher Copyright: © 2023 The AuthorsBackground: Treatment of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and renal dysfunction (RD) is challenging owing to the risk of further deterioration in renal function, especially after acute decompensated HF (ADHF). Methods and Results: We assessed the effect of RD (estimated glomerular filtration rate of ≥30 to <60 mL/min/1.73 m2) on initiation, up-titration, and tolerability of sacubitril/valsartan in hemodynamically stabilized patients with HFrEF admitted for ADHF (RD, n = 476; non-RD, n = 483). At week 10, the target dose of sacubitril/valsartan (97/103 mg twice daily) was achieved by 42% patients in RD subgroup vs 54% in non-RD patients (P < .001). Sacubitril/valsartan was associated with greater estimated glomerular filtration rate improvements in RD subgroup than non-RD (change from baseline least squares mean 4.1 mL/min/1.73 m2, 95% confidence interval 2.2–6.1, P < .001). Cardiac biomarkers improved significantly in both subgroups; however, compared with the RD subgroup, the improvement was greater in those without RD (N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, −28.6% vs −44.8%, high-sensitivity troponin T −20.3% vs −33.9%) (P < .001). Patients in the RD subgroup compared with those without RD experienced higher rates of hyperkalemia (16.3% vs 6.5%, P < .001), investigator-reported cardiac failure (9.7% vs 5.6%, P = .029), and renal impairment (6.4% vs 2.1%, P = .002). Conclusions: Most patients with HFrEF and concomitant RD hospitalized for ADHF tolerated early initiation of sacubitril/valsartan and showed significant improvements in estimated glomerular filtration rate and cardiac biomarkers. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT02661217.proofepub_ahead_of_prin

Clinical and psychopathological features associated of obsessive and depersonalization disorders

The results of the study showed the presence of definite syntropia between various clinical variants of obsessive and depersonalization disorders. Autopsychic depersonalization is most characteristic for contrast obsessions, whereas somatopsychic depersonalization is for re-control obsessions. Derealization or allopsychic depersonalization are more often observed in patients with obstructive extracorporeal threats. Depersonalization of change is equally characteristic for patients with schizotypal disorder and psychogenic personality development, whereas depersonalization of loss and splitting were observed only in cases of schizophrenic spectrum disorders.</jats:p

Rationale and design of TRANSITION: a multi-center, randomised, open-label study comparing pre-versus post-discharge initiation of sacubitril/valsartan in hospitalised patients with ADHF and HFrEF

Novartis Pharma A

Rationale and design of TRANSITION: a multi-center, randomised, open-label study comparing pre-versus post-discharge initiation of sacubitril/valsartan in hospitalised patients with ADHF and HFrEF

Novartis Pharma A

1410Clinical predictors of NT-proBNP response to early initiation of sacubitril/valsartan after hospitalisation for decompensated heart failure: An analysis of the TRANSITION study

Abstract Background NT-proBNP has diagnostic and prognostic value in patients with heart failure (HF). Compared with enalapril, sacubitril/valsartan (S/V) significantly reduced NT-proBNP within 1 week (wk) of administration and reduced HF re-hospitalisation in patients with acute decompensated HF (ADHF) in PIONEER-HF. Identification of predictors of NT-proBNP reduction with S/V could aid prognostication following hospitalisation. Methods TRANSITION (NCT02661217) is an open label study in stabilised ADHF patients with HFrEF that compared S/V initiation pre- versus post-discharge (within 2 wk of discharge). Baseline NT-proBNP was measured at randomisation in both S/V groups (n=950). Clinical predictors of favourable response of NT-proBNP to S/V therapy (defined as reduction to &lt;1000 pg/ml or &gt;30% reduction vs. baseline) were studied at discharge, 4 wk and 10 wk post-randomisation. Results Median NT-proBNP at randomisation was similar in patients with S/V started pre- and post-discharge (1919 vs 1659 pg/ml). In patients receiving S/V in-hospital, NT-proBNP was reduced by 28% at discharge, compared to a 3% reduction in patients receiving optimised standard of care (between group p&lt;0.001). A favorable response was reached in 46% vs 18% patients at discharge, 46% vs 42% at 4 weeks and 51% vs 48% at 10 weeks in pre- vs post-discharge groups. (Figure 1). Predictors of favourable NT-proBNP response to S/V at discharge were hypertension and shorter time from admission to first S/V dose. At 4 wk after randomisation, NT-proBNP was reduced similarly in patients started on S/V pre- and post-discharge. When the two S/V initiation groups were combined, predictors of favorable NT-proBNP response at 4 wk were higher initial dose of S/V (≥49/51 mg b.i.d.), higher baseline levels of NT-proBNP, de novo HF hospitalisation, ACEI/ARB naïve, lower baseline creatinine, no atrial fibrillation (AFib), no prior myocardial infarction (MI). A further reduction in NT-proBNP was seen at 10 wk post-randomisation in patients started on S/V pre- and post-discharge (38% vs 34%, between group p=0.250). Predictors of favourable NT-proBNP response to S/V were similar at 4 wk and 10 wk post-randomisation. Conclusion In-hospital initiation of sacubitril/valsartan shortly after stabilisation was associated with a prompt improvement of NT-proBNP already at discharge, whereas higher baseline levels of NT-proBNP, higher starting dose, absence of AFib and MI history, de novo HF and ACEI/ARB naïve status were associated with favourable NT-proBNP response in the vulnerable phase after discharge. Acknowledgement/Funding The TRANSITION study was funded by Novartis </jats:sec