Tanggung Jawab Pidana Korporasi Rumah Sakit

Hospital is an institution that provides comprehensive health services on preventive, promotive, curative and rehabilitative to the public at largeas regulated in Article 1 (3) of Law Number 44 Year 2009 About the Hospital, which says "Comprehensive health services are health services which include promotive, preventive, curative, and rehabilitative services. In addition, the hospital is an institution that dense of capital, technology and human resources, so it could potentially cause problems both internally and externally. The hospital previously regarded as a social institution that provides medical assistance to the public, but in the present position of the hospital has experienced changes, which had shaped a social institution become an institution in the form of a corporation incorporated under the law which have the rights and obligations as a legal person (rechts persoon) that lead to a dominant profit-seeking health services. Issues that have sprung up in the present, in case of medical errors by physicians or health workers who work in hospitals and provide economic or moral benefits, patients litigate doctors, especially criminal law, and never asked the corporate criminal liability of hospital that the establishment has a legal entity (rechts persoon). That issue makes the writer interested in reviewing whether the hospital as a corporation can be held criminally liable. The result of this study showed that the hospital can be held criminally liable because a hospital as a corporation is a legal person (rechts persoon) who have rights and obligations as well as a natural person (naturlijke persoon). Besides, the legal doctrine of Vicarious Liability and Strict Liability hold that there can be a person liable for the actions of his employees as far as the employment relationship in a hospital/corporation

Pancasila Sebagai Nilai Dasar Profesi Dokter

Profesi dokter yang merupakan profesi tertua serta profesi mulia dikarenakan memberikan pelayanan medis dengan tujuan memberi kesembuhan bagi pasien, namun dihadapkan dengan permasalahan dokter yang tidak berkeinginan untuk mengabdi kepada masyarakat yang tidak mampu secara ekonomi dan sosial, sehingga dalam penulisan ini dikaitkan dengan nilai-nilai Pancasila sebagai nilai dasar negara Indonesia. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa dokter dalam menjalankan profesi dokter belum menjiwai nilai Pancasila, dikarenakan masih banyak dokter yang ingin mencari keuntungan ekonomi dalam menjalankan profesi dokter, serta nilai Pancasila hanya dijadikan sebagai serimonial, seharusnya nilai Pancasila dimasukan dalam kurikulum akademik dokter dengan tujuan dokter memberikan pelayanan medis kepada pasien  penuh dengan hati nurani

TANGGUNG JAWAB PIDANA DOKTER DALAM KESALAHAN MEDIS (Analisis Hukum Putusan Kasasi Nomor 365 K/Pid/2012)

As with the case of dr.Dewa Ayu Sasiary Parwani et al suspected medical errors in medical action that causes the death of the patient has not been proven medical errors of aspects of medical disciplines that led to big problems due to the lack of evidence that proves the physician acts as a medical error. This research aims to find out how to determine if the criteria for a medical doctor suspected medical negligence, and whether the decision of the Supreme Court No. 365 K/Pid/2012 in accordance with the criminal liability of doctors in medical errors). (To determine the criteria for medical errors must first be proven by means of medical audit by the medical committee as stipulated in PERMENKES No. 755 of 2011 on the Implementation of the Medical Committee at the Hospital. Due to request criminal liability as a doctor in the decision of the Supreme Court 365K/Pid/2012 number, then the doctors who allegedly committed medical errors it should first be proven medical errors through medical audits conducted by the Medical Committee. If convicted of medical errors, the results of the audit can be used as a basis for law enforcement to determine fault in criminal law that a criminal can be held accountabl

TANGGUNG JAWAB PIDANA KORUPSI RUMAH SAKIT

Hospital is an institution that provides health services both preventive, promotive, curative and rehabilitation to the public at large. In addition, the hospital is a solid institution of capital, technology and human resources, thus potentially causing problems both internally and externally. Hospitals were previously regarded as social institutions that provide medical assistance to the wider community, but at the present time the position of hospitals has undergone a change, formerly in the form of social institutions becoming corporate institutions that lead to the dominant health services seeking economic benefits. Problems that arise in the present moment, when a medical error occurs by a doctor or health care provider, the patient only demands a criminal doctor and never asks for corporate criminal responsibility. With this issue that makes the author to interested in assessing whether the hospital can be held accountable corporate criminal. So in the study of the authors obtained a conclusion that the hospital can be asked for criminal responsibility because the hospital as a corporation is a legal subject that has rights and duties as well as humans. In addition the legal doctrine of Vicaroius Liability and Strict Liability clarifies that the employer / employer who hires a worker / employee can be responsible as long as his / her relationship with the relationship in a hospital / corporation.Kata Kunci : Tanggung Jawab Pidana, Korporasi, Rumah Saki

POLITIK HUKUM PIDANA Rekam Medis Sebagai Alat Bukti dalam Hukum Pembuktian Pidana

Medical Currently, the relationship between doctor and patient is not just the relationship treatment alone, but he is also part of "therapeutic agreement" in which the patient is required to know and understand their rights and obligations in any effort to cure. One of the rights of patients in the treatment process is to get a record of treatment from a doctor or hospital, which in the world of health known as the Medical Record. But unfortunately, not many people who understand what it is and the importance of medical records for patients. Though medical record is valuable and important function for the patient, because it contains a description of a patient's medical history as well as actions taken by doctors in an effort to cure. In fact, not only that, the medical records could also be evidence in cases of alleged medical errors doctor sin handling/treating patients. This paper is going to study the problem of medical record as evidence in the criminal laws of evidence, especially in cases of alleged misconduct medical doctor

Medical record and informed consent:sebagai Alat bukti dalam hukum pembuktian

vii,99 hlm

Tanggung Jawab Pidana Korporasi Rumah Sakit

Hospital is an institution that provides comprehensive health services on preventive, promotive, curative and rehabilitative to the public at largeas regulated in Article 1 (3) of Law Number 44 Year 2009 About the Hospital, which says "Comprehensive health services are health services which include promotive, preventive, curative, and rehabilitative services. In addition, the hospital is an institution that dense of capital, technology and human resources, so it could potentially cause problems both internally and externally. The hospital previously regarded as a social institution that provides medical assistance to the public, but in the present position of the hospital has experienced changes, which had shaped a social institution become an institution in the form of a corporation incorporated under the law which have the rights and obligations as a legal person (rechts persoon) that lead to a dominant profit-seeking health services. Issues that have sprung up in the present, in case of medical errors by physicians or health workers who work in hospitals and provide economic or moral benefits, patients litigate doctors, especially criminal law, and never asked the corporate criminal liability of hospital that the establishment has a legal entity (rechts persoon). That issue makes the writer interested in reviewing whether the hospital as a corporation can be held criminally liable. The result of this study showed that the hospital can be held criminally liable because a hospital as a corporation is a legal person (rechts persoon) who have rights and obligations as well as a natural person (naturlijke persoon). Besides, the legal doctrine of Vicarious Liability and Strict Liability hold that there can be a person liable for the actions of his employees as far as the employment relationship in a hospital/corporation

Immunology: an introduction for the health sciences

xii, 168p

Medical record and informed consent sebagai alat bukti dalam hukum pembuktian

viii,100 hlm

Tanggung Jawab Pidana Dokter dalam kesalahan Medis

viii, 248 hlm.; 20.5 c