1,491 research outputs found
GRADE equity guidelines 3: considering health equity in GRADE guideline development: rating the certainty of synthesized evidence
Objectives:
The aim of this paper is to describe a conceptual framework for how to consider health equity in the Grading Recommendations Assessment and Development Evidence (GRADE) guideline development process.
Study Design and Setting:
Consensus-based guidance developed by the GRADE working group members and other methodologists.
Results:
We developed consensus-based guidance to help address health equity when rating the certainty of synthesized evidence (i.e., quality of evidence). When health inequity is determined to be a concern by stakeholders, we propose five methods for explicitly assessing health equity: (1) include health equity as an outcome; (2) consider patient-important outcomes relevant to health equity; (3) assess differences in the relative effect size of the treatment; (4) assess differences in baseline risk and the differing impacts on absolute effects; and (5) assess indirectness of evidence to disadvantaged populations and/or settings.
Conclusion:
The most important priority for research on health inequity and guidelines is to identify and document examples where health equity has been considered explicitly in guidelines. Although there is a weak scientific evidence base for assessing health equity, this should not discourage the explicit consideration of how guidelines and recommendations affect the most vulnerable members of society
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF TERRITORIES OF MINING REGIONS
Developing innovative technologies of mining coal seams and
increasing the competitiveness of coal produced and providing further
diversification of the mine using the "post-mining" concept as the basis for
sustainable development of the coal mine region
ILR Impact Brief - Community College Websites and Barriers to Access
[Excerpt] Community colleges, on average, serve 335 students with disabilities, although that number climbs to 5,000 at the largest college surveyed for this project. Nearly all community colleges that participated in the survey rely on the web for a variety of student services, but only half have instituted requirements regarding web accessibility for individuals with disabilities. Actual evaluations of accessibility and ease of use revealed that none of the websites analyzed complied with all federal standards on accessibility, and many web pages encompassed usability obstacles (e.g., unfamiliar terminology, unintuitive navigation schemes, and hard-to-read design elements) that affected disabled and non-disabled individuals alike
Human development and inequality in the 20th Century : the Mercosur countries in a comparative perspective
This article is in line with the United Nations attempts to approach human
development in wider terms than per capita GDP, and in line with an ever lively
debate on the historical standard of living and on the role of inequality in
development. We focus on three Mercosur countries (Argentina, Brazil and
Uruguay) and we view them in comparison with four core countries (France,
Germany, USA and UK) along the 20th Century. The paper makes different
attempts to construct diverse indices and to change the weights of their
different components in order to better explain human development in different
periods. A contribution of the paper, so long limited to Uruguay and the USA, is
to adjust the historical human development index by inequality measures for all
of its components. The results show that Argentine started to diverge, even in
human development, at early stages of the 20th Century; that Uruguay
diverged from the mid-century and that Brazil continued to tighten the gap up
to 1980, diverging afterwards without being able to come close to the levels of
the core countries. Total inequality in Uruguay and USA showed similar levels
and trends: it decreased until the 1950s, and increased afterwards to similar
levels. While inequality affects human development within both countries, it
doesn?t help to understand the differences between them, due to the mentioned
similarity of the Gini-coefficients
Current, January 21, 1997
https://irl.umsl.edu/current1990s/1224/thumbnail.jp
- …