18 research outputs found

    Design and in vitro studies of a needle-type glucose sensor for subcutaneous monitoring

    Get PDF
    International audienceA new miniaturized glucose oxidase based needle-type glu¬ cose mlcrosensor has been developed for subcutaneous glu¬ cose monitoring. The sensor Is equivalent In shape and size to a 26-gauge needle (0.45-mm o.d.) and can be Implanted with ease without any Incision. The novel configuration greatly facilitates the deposition of enzyme and polymer films so that sensors with characteristics suitable for In vivo use (upper limit of linear range > 15 mM, response time 60%). The sensor response is largely Independent of ox¬ ygen tension In the normal physiological range. It also ex¬ hibits good selectivity against common interferences except for the exogenous drug acetaminophen

    General abstracts of current literature

    No full text

    Spin excitations in cubic maghemite nanoparticles studied by time-of-flight neutron spectroscopy

    Get PDF
    We have determined the field dependence of collective magnetic excitations in iron oxide nanoparticles of cubic shape with 8.42(2) nm edge length and a narrow log normal size distribution of 8.2(2)% using time-of-flight neutron spectroscopy. The energy dependence of the uniform precession modes was investigated up to 5 T applied field and yields a Landé factor g=2.05(2) as expected for maghemite (γ-Fe2O3) nanoparticles. A large effective anisotropy field of BA,eff=0.45(16) T was determined, in excellent agreement with macroscopic measurements. This anisotropy is attributed to enhanced shape anisotropy in these monodisperse cubic nanoparticles. The combination of our results with macroscopic magnetization information provides a consistent view of the energy scales of superparamagnetic relaxation and collective magnetic excitations in magnetic nanoparticles. © 2014 American Physical Society.1441sciescopu

    Use of a Heart Team in Decision-Making for Patients with Complex Coronary Disease at Hospitals in Michigan Prior to Guideline Endorsement

    No full text
    <div><p>Background</p><p>Revascularization decisions can profoundly impact patient survival, quality of life, and procedural risk. Although use of Heart Teams to make revascularization decisions is growing, data on their implementation in the real-world are limited. Our objective was to assess the prevalence of Heart Teams and their association with collaboration in routine practice.</p><p>Methods</p><p>A survey of cardiologists and cardiac surgeons at 31 hospitals in Michigan was performed in May, 2011 – prior to the recommendation for using Heart Teams in national guidelines. This survey included all percutaneous coronary intervention-performing hospitals in Michigan participating in the Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium and Michigan Society of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons Quality Collaborative. It targeted both the use of Heart Teams and multidisciplinary Case Conferences.</p><p>Results</p><p>There were 53 physician survey respondents from 27 hospitals with 4 hospitals not responding. Among respondents, 11 (40.7%) hospitals reported no Heart Teams or Case Conferences while 7 (25.9%) hospitals reported either a Heart Team or Case Conference. However, there was disagreement about the presence of a Heart Team at seven hospitals, and about Case Conferences at nine hospitals. Hospitals with definite Heart Teams reported significantly greater levels of collaboration between cardiologists and cardiac surgeons.</p><p>Conclusion</p><p>The overall presence of Heart Teams prior to their recommendation in national guidelines was limited. Even among hospitals with a potential Heart Team, there was substantial disagreement between respondents about their presence. Further refinement of the definition of a Heart Team and measures of successful implementation are needed.</p></div

    Hospital Characteristics for Calendar Year 2012.

    No full text
    <p><i>Reported p-values are for the comparison between all Heart Team hospitals (Definite and Possible) versus non-Heart Team hospitals.</i></p><p>Hospital Characteristics for Calendar Year 2012.</p
    corecore