74 research outputs found
Ability of low profile cross-ventilated freestall barns to improve environmental conditions for dairy cattle
Recently, there has been interest in constructing mechanical ventilation with evaporative pads to improve the environmental conditions for cows during periods of heat stress. Low profile cross-ventilated freestalls with evaporative pads (LPCV) have become a popular system. The purpose of this study was to evaluate how well these LPCV systems improve the temperature-humidity index (THI) under different ambient conditions. As ambient humidity increases, ability of the LPCV to reduce THI is decreased. Producers wishing to construct LPCV barns should carefully evaluate the climate in which they want to construct LPCV structures.; Dairy Day, 2007, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, 2007; Dairy Research, 2007 is known as Dairy Day, 200
Development of a Berry Processing Score for Sorghum Silage
This study was done in an effort to develop a berry processing score (BPS) for sorghum silage, similar to the kernel processing score (KPS) currently used for corn silage. Sorghum silage samples were collected from 3 dairies in Kansas and processed in the Grain Science & Industry grain processing laboratory at Kansas State University using one of four different roll gap settings to give four differently processed samples: unprocessed, 1.5, 1.0, or 0.5 mm. After drying, samples were placed into a Ro-Tap particle separation machine for 10 minutes until the whole sample was separated. Whole samples, as well as separated fiber and whole berry portions were analyzed for percent starch retained on each screen. As the roll gap was reduced, mean particle size (MPS) was also reduced. Percent starch passing through the 1.7 mm screen was greater at the 0.5 mm roll gap for both the whole sample and the whole berry samples, indicating successful processing of the samples. Using these data, we have determined that the appropriate screen to use in determining a BPS for sorghum silage is the 1.7 mm screen. A BPS for any sorghum silage sample can be calculated by analyzing the whole sample for the percent starch that passes through the 1.7 mm screen. This study is still ongoing and more research is needed to determine the recommended BPS in sorghum silage
Influence of freestall building orientation on comfort of lactating dairy cattle during summer heat stress
A trial was conducted during the summer of 2000 to evaluate the effect of freestall building orientation ”east-west vs. northsouth ” on respiration rates of lactating dairy cows, temperature-humidity index (THI) in the barns, barn temperature, and barn humidity. Differences between ambient and barn temperature and THI were higher in east-west vs. north-south orientated barns. Respiration rates were higher in north-south than in east-west orientated structures. The magnitude of differences between barn and ambient temperatures and THI did not fully explain differences in respiration rates between north-south and east-west orientated barns. Other factors such as solar radiation, airflow, and animal stress may have contributed to the differences in respiration rates.; Dairy Day, 2001, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, 2001
Keeping cows cool
Heat stress occurs when a dairy cow’s
internal heat load is greater than her capacity
to lose unwanted heat to the environment.
Effects of heat stress include: increased
respiration rate, increased water intake, increased
sweating, decreased dry matter intake,
slower rate of feed passage, decreased
blood flow to internal organs, decreased milk
production, and poor reproductive performance.
Lower milk production and reproductive
performance cause economic losses
to dairy producers. The ordered priorities for
reducing heat are: increasing water availability;
providing shade in the housing areas
(both dry and lactating cows) and holding
pen; reducing walking distance to the parlor;
reducing time in the holding pen; improving
holding pen ventilation and freestall ventilation;
adding cooling for the holding pen and
exit lane; cooling close-up cows (3 wk before
calving); cooling housing for fresh and earlylactation
cows; and cooling housing for midand
late-lactation cows
Fan placement and heat stress abatement in four-row freestall barns
Smith et al. Fan Placement and Heat Stress Abatement in Four-row Freestall Barns. Manhattan, KS, Kansas State University, November 2001
Use of Evaporative Cooling Systems and Their Effects on Core Body Temperature and Lying Times in Lactating Dairy Cattle
A study was performed to assess the effect of an evaporative cooling system on respiration rates, rear udder temperature (Tu), core body temperature (CBT), and resting time in lactating dairy cows. Cows were divided into two treatment groups and rotated between two facilities. Cows were either housed in a bedded pack barn (PACK) equipped with an evaporative cooling system (Cyclone fans, Chippewa Falls, WI) or a tie-stall barn (TIE) equipped with cooling cells. Cows housed in PACK had two cooling treatments: FAN (Cyclone fans only, no fog); and FANFOG (Cyclone fans and fog on). Groups of cows rotated between TIE and PACK every 8 hours, and effects of housing as well as cooling treatment within PACK were analyzed. During FANFOG, PACK cows had a reduction (P \u3c 0.05) in respiration rate (breaths per minute) in comparison to TIE (69 vs 76 ± 2.4 BPM). Breaths per minute also increased significantly throughout the day for TIE but this was not the case for PACK. No differences were found in Tu between treatments. While exposed to the FANFOG environment, cows spent decreased time above 102.2°F CBT when compared to FAN. Cows housed in PACK during FAN and FANFOG also spent fewer hours/ day above 102.2°F CBT vs TIE. Cows housed in TIE showed numerically greater total daily lying times during FAN and FANFOG compared to cows housed in PACK, although these results were not significant. These results confirm that evaporative cooling systems (Cyclone fans and fog) are effective at decreasing respiration rates and CBT, while having no effect on Tu and lying times in lactating dairy cows
Special needs facilities: recommendations for housing for pregnant, lactating and sick cows.
Smith et al., Special Needs Facilities: Recommendations for housing for pregnant, lactating and sick cows. Manhattan, KS, Kansas State University, July 2001
Drinking water requirements for lactating dairy cows
A study to determine the amount and location of water consumption in dairy freestall barns located in northeastern Kansas was conducted during the summer of 2000. Three farms, two Holstein farms with either 2-row or 4-row freestall barns and one Jersey farm with 4-row freestall buildings, were used. Summer water usage averaged 30 to 40 gallons per Holstein cow/day and 20 to 40 gallons/cow/day for Jersey cows depending on age and stage of lactation. The farms with Holstein cows had a water usage ratio of 4 to 4.5 lb of water per lb of milk produced and Jersey cows required 3.1 lb of water per lb of milk production. However, at the Holstein dairies, only about 85% of this water was consumed and the other 15% was utilized to refill the tanks after tipping twice daily to clean cross-overs and water troughs. In addition, 35 to 45% of the water consumed is from a water station in the center crossover of each pen. Cattle also drank the least amount of water from the trough located in the crossover furthest from the pen entrance. When given access to a water trough on the milking parlor exit, cattle consumed 10% (3.5 gallons/cow/day) of the daily water intake at this location. Water usage for drinking increased as milk production increased. Adequate water system capacity and water rights are needed to make allowances for future increases in milk production. Water consumption was greater at the center alleys. Therefore, engineers should consider additional space and/or water troughs at these watering stations.; Dairy Day, 2001, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, 2001
Effect of headlocks on milk production and feed intake of dairy cattle
Cows previously trained with headlocks
did not increase milk production or feed
intake when headlocks were removed. Twoyear-
old and older cows did not differ in
response to headlocks and neckrails. Prudent
use of headlocks increases labor efficiency
of a commercial dairy. Managing a dairy
without headlocks is a challenge because
cows must be sorted and worked off the
milking parlor flow. In the case of large
milking parlors, it may be necessary to process
50-200 cows per hour. Depending upon
the treatment facilities, this number of cows
may create a bottleneck in the dairy. For
many routine procedures, headlocks offer the
simplest and most cost-effective alternative.
It is important to note that headlocks can be
mismanaged. This is especially true during
summer months. Locking up cows for extended
periods without access to water or
shade may have adverse effects during summer
heat stress. It is important to minimize
lock-up time. Consideration should also be
given to training heifers to headlocks prior to
calving. It is very likely that untrained
heifers may be reluctant to be placed in
headlocks. If this occurs, intake could be
limited during their first exposure to
headlocks. If heifers are not trained to headlocks
prior to calving, one should determine
if they should be locked-up each day during
the first week of lactation. Headlocks can be
successfully used on a dairy. The critical
question is how will they be managed.
Successful managers of headlocks minimize
restraint time, push-up or feed pens often (6-
8 times per day), and avoid use of headlocks
during late morning and afternoon hours
during the summer months
Consumptive water usage of evaporative pads
Dairy Research, 2006 is known as Dairy Day, 2006Consumptive water usage by evaporative pads was measured during 7 days of a 3-week period at a Kansas (KS) dairy and a 2-day pe-riod at a North Dakota (ND) dairy. Water me-ters were installed between the water hydrants, and evaporative pads at each dairy, and were monitored. Data were recorded every 30 min-utes during 5 hr at the KS site and every 15 minutes during 1 to 2.5 hr at the ND site. Ra-tio of pad area to cow equaled 4.8 and 4.5 ft2 per cow at the KS and ND sites, respectively. Airflow rates through the pads were 1.2, 2.1, and 3.2 mph at the ND dairy and 3.3 mph at the KS dairy. During the study period in KS, the temperature humidity index ranged from 78 to 86 and water usage varied from 0.7 to 4.7 gallon per minute. Average pad efficiency equaled 62%. Water usage averaged 0.3 gal-lons per hr per ft2 of pad when airflow rate was 3.3 to 3.6 mph. At the ND dairy, the wa-ter usage averaged 0.1, 0.3, and 0.38 gallon per hr per ft2 of pad for the low, medium, and high airflow rates, respectively. The tempera-ture humidity index equaled 65, 72.5, and 71 for the low, medium, and high airflow study periods. Pad efficiency averaged 93, 86, and 81% from the low to high airflow rates. Simi-lar to pad efficiencies at the KS site, efficiency increased as the outdoor air temperature de-creased.
(Key Words: Coolin
- …